audk/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/PeiRegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c

311 lines
8.0 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/** @file
CPU Register Table Library functions.
Copyright (c) 2016, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
This program and the accompanying materials
are licensed and made available under the terms and conditions of the BSD License
which accompanies this distribution. The full text of the license may be found at
http://opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
THE PROGRAM IS DISTRIBUTED UNDER THE BSD LICENSE ON AN "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.
**/
#include <PiPei.h>
#include <Library/HobLib.h>
#include <Library/PeiServicesLib.h>
#include <Library/PeiServicesTablePointerLib.h>
#include <Ppi/MpServices.h>
#include "RegisterCpuFeatures.h"
#define REGISTER_CPU_FEATURES_GUID \
{ \
0xa694c467, 0x697a, 0x446b, { 0xb9, 0x29, 0x5b, 0x14, 0xa0, 0xcf, 0x39, 0xf } \
}
EFI_GUID mRegisterCpuFeaturesHobGuid = REGISTER_CPU_FEATURES_GUID;
/**
Worker function to get CPU_FEATURES_DATA pointer.
@return Pointer to CPU_FEATURES_DATA.
**/
CPU_FEATURES_DATA *
GetCpuFeaturesData (
VOID
)
{
CPU_FEATURES_DATA *CpuInitData;
EFI_HOB_GUID_TYPE *GuidHob;
VOID *DataInHob;
UINT64 Data64;
CpuInitData = NULL;
GuidHob = GetFirstGuidHob (&mRegisterCpuFeaturesHobGuid);
if (GuidHob != NULL) {
DataInHob = GET_GUID_HOB_DATA (GuidHob);
CpuInitData = (CPU_FEATURES_DATA *) (*(UINTN *) DataInHob);
ASSERT (CpuInitData != NULL);
} else {
CpuInitData = AllocateZeroPool (sizeof (CPU_FEATURES_DATA));
ASSERT (CpuInitData != NULL);
//
// Build location of CPU MP DATA buffer in HOB
//
Data64 = (UINT64) (UINTN) CpuInitData;
BuildGuidDataHob (
&mRegisterCpuFeaturesHobGuid,
(VOID *) &Data64,
sizeof (UINT64)
);
}
return CpuInitData;
}
/**
Worker function to get MP PPI service pointer.
@return PEI PPI service pointer.
**/
EFI_PEI_MP_SERVICES_PPI *
GetMpPpi (
VOID
)
{
EFI_STATUS Status;
EFI_PEI_MP_SERVICES_PPI *CpuMpPpi;
//
// Get MP Services Protocol
//
Status = PeiServicesLocatePpi (
&gEfiPeiMpServicesPpiGuid,
0,
NULL,
(VOID **)&CpuMpPpi
);
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
return CpuMpPpi;
}
/**
Worker function to return processor index.
@return The processor index.
**/
UINTN
GetProcessorIndex (
VOID
)
{
EFI_STATUS Status;
EFI_PEI_MP_SERVICES_PPI *CpuMpPpi;
UINTN ProcessorIndex;
CpuMpPpi = GetMpPpi ();
Status = CpuMpPpi->WhoAmI(GetPeiServicesTablePointer (), CpuMpPpi, &ProcessorIndex);
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
return ProcessorIndex;
}
/**
Worker function to MP-related information on the requested processor at the
instant this call is made.
@param[in] ProcessorNumber The handle number of processor.
@param[out] ProcessorInfoBuffer A pointer to the buffer where information for
the requested processor is deposited.
@return Status of MpServices->GetProcessorInfo().
**/
EFI_STATUS
GetProcessorInformation (
IN UINTN ProcessorNumber,
OUT EFI_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION *ProcessorInfoBuffer
)
{
EFI_PEI_MP_SERVICES_PPI *CpuMpPpi;
EFI_STATUS Status;
CpuMpPpi = GetMpPpi ();
Status = CpuMpPpi->GetProcessorInfo (
GetPeiServicesTablePointer(),
CpuMpPpi,
ProcessorNumber,
ProcessorInfoBuffer
);
return Status;
}
/**
Worker function to execute a caller provided function on all enabled APs.
@param[in] Procedure A pointer to the function to be run on
enabled APs of the system.
**/
VOID
StartupAPsWorker (
UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Add logic to support semaphore type. V4 changes include: 1. Serial debug message for different threads when program the register table. V3 changes include: 1. Use global variable instead of internal function to return string for register type and dependence type. 2. Add comments for some complicated logic. V2 changes include: 1. Add more description for the code part which need easy to understand. 2. Refine some code base on feedback for V1 changes. V1 changes include: In a system which has multiple cores, current set register value task costs huge times. After investigation, current set MSR task costs most of the times. Current logic uses SpinLock to let set MSR task as an single thread task for all cores. Because MSR has scope attribute which may cause GP fault if multiple APs set MSR at the same time, current logic use an easiest solution (use SpinLock) to avoid this issue, but it will cost huge times. In order to fix this performance issue, new solution will set MSRs base on their scope attribute. After this, the SpinLock will not needed. Without SpinLock, new issue raised which is caused by MSR dependence. For example, MSR A depends on MSR B which means MSR A must been set after MSR B has been set. Also MSR B is package scope level and MSR A is thread scope level. If system has multiple threads, Thread 1 needs to set the thread level MSRs and thread 2 needs to set thread and package level MSRs. Set MSRs task for thread 1 and thread 2 like below: Thread 1 Thread 2 MSR B N Y MSR A Y Y If driver don't control execute MSR order, for thread 1, it will execute MSR A first, but at this time, MSR B not been executed yet by thread 2. system may trig exception at this time. In order to fix the above issue, driver introduces semaphore logic to control the MSR execute sequence. For the above case, a semaphore will be add between MSR A and B for all threads. Semaphore has scope info for it. The possible scope value is core or package. For each thread, when it meets a semaphore during it set registers, it will 1) release semaphore (+1) for each threads in this core or package(based on the scope info for this semaphore) 2) acquire semaphore (-1) for all the threads in this core or package(based on the scope info for this semaphore). With these two steps, driver can control MSR sequence. Sample code logic like below: // // First increase semaphore count by 1 for processors in this package. // for (ProcessorIndex = 0; ProcessorIndex < PackageThreadsCount ; ProcessorIndex ++) { LibReleaseSemaphore ((UINT32 *) &SemaphorePtr[PackageOffset + ProcessorIndex]); } // // Second, check whether the count has reach the check number. // for (ProcessorIndex = 0; ProcessorIndex < ValidApCount; ProcessorIndex ++) { LibWaitForSemaphore (&SemaphorePtr[ApOffset]); } Platform Requirement: 1. This change requires register MSR setting base on MSR scope info. If still register MSR for all threads, exception may raised. Known limitation: 1. Current CpuFeatures driver supports DXE instance and PEI instance. But semaphore logic requires Aps execute in async mode which is not supported by PEI driver. So CpuFeature PEI instance not works after this change. We plan to support async mode for PEI in phase 2 for this task. Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
2018-10-17 03:31:03 +02:00
IN EFI_AP_PROCEDURE Procedure,
IN EFI_EVENT MpEvent
)
{
EFI_STATUS Status;
EFI_PEI_MP_SERVICES_PPI *CpuMpPpi;
UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Add logic to support semaphore type. V4 changes include: 1. Serial debug message for different threads when program the register table. V3 changes include: 1. Use global variable instead of internal function to return string for register type and dependence type. 2. Add comments for some complicated logic. V2 changes include: 1. Add more description for the code part which need easy to understand. 2. Refine some code base on feedback for V1 changes. V1 changes include: In a system which has multiple cores, current set register value task costs huge times. After investigation, current set MSR task costs most of the times. Current logic uses SpinLock to let set MSR task as an single thread task for all cores. Because MSR has scope attribute which may cause GP fault if multiple APs set MSR at the same time, current logic use an easiest solution (use SpinLock) to avoid this issue, but it will cost huge times. In order to fix this performance issue, new solution will set MSRs base on their scope attribute. After this, the SpinLock will not needed. Without SpinLock, new issue raised which is caused by MSR dependence. For example, MSR A depends on MSR B which means MSR A must been set after MSR B has been set. Also MSR B is package scope level and MSR A is thread scope level. If system has multiple threads, Thread 1 needs to set the thread level MSRs and thread 2 needs to set thread and package level MSRs. Set MSRs task for thread 1 and thread 2 like below: Thread 1 Thread 2 MSR B N Y MSR A Y Y If driver don't control execute MSR order, for thread 1, it will execute MSR A first, but at this time, MSR B not been executed yet by thread 2. system may trig exception at this time. In order to fix the above issue, driver introduces semaphore logic to control the MSR execute sequence. For the above case, a semaphore will be add between MSR A and B for all threads. Semaphore has scope info for it. The possible scope value is core or package. For each thread, when it meets a semaphore during it set registers, it will 1) release semaphore (+1) for each threads in this core or package(based on the scope info for this semaphore) 2) acquire semaphore (-1) for all the threads in this core or package(based on the scope info for this semaphore). With these two steps, driver can control MSR sequence. Sample code logic like below: // // First increase semaphore count by 1 for processors in this package. // for (ProcessorIndex = 0; ProcessorIndex < PackageThreadsCount ; ProcessorIndex ++) { LibReleaseSemaphore ((UINT32 *) &SemaphorePtr[PackageOffset + ProcessorIndex]); } // // Second, check whether the count has reach the check number. // for (ProcessorIndex = 0; ProcessorIndex < ValidApCount; ProcessorIndex ++) { LibWaitForSemaphore (&SemaphorePtr[ApOffset]); } Platform Requirement: 1. This change requires register MSR setting base on MSR scope info. If still register MSR for all threads, exception may raised. Known limitation: 1. Current CpuFeatures driver supports DXE instance and PEI instance. But semaphore logic requires Aps execute in async mode which is not supported by PEI driver. So CpuFeature PEI instance not works after this change. We plan to support async mode for PEI in phase 2 for this task. Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
2018-10-17 03:31:03 +02:00
CPU_FEATURES_DATA *CpuFeaturesData;
CpuFeaturesData = GetCpuFeaturesData ();
//
// Get MP Services Protocol
//
Status = PeiServicesLocatePpi (
&gEfiPeiMpServicesPpiGuid,
0,
NULL,
(VOID **)&CpuMpPpi
);
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
//
// Wakeup all APs for data collection.
//
Status = CpuMpPpi->StartupAllAPs (
GetPeiServicesTablePointer (),
CpuMpPpi,
Procedure,
FALSE,
0,
UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Add logic to support semaphore type. V4 changes include: 1. Serial debug message for different threads when program the register table. V3 changes include: 1. Use global variable instead of internal function to return string for register type and dependence type. 2. Add comments for some complicated logic. V2 changes include: 1. Add more description for the code part which need easy to understand. 2. Refine some code base on feedback for V1 changes. V1 changes include: In a system which has multiple cores, current set register value task costs huge times. After investigation, current set MSR task costs most of the times. Current logic uses SpinLock to let set MSR task as an single thread task for all cores. Because MSR has scope attribute which may cause GP fault if multiple APs set MSR at the same time, current logic use an easiest solution (use SpinLock) to avoid this issue, but it will cost huge times. In order to fix this performance issue, new solution will set MSRs base on their scope attribute. After this, the SpinLock will not needed. Without SpinLock, new issue raised which is caused by MSR dependence. For example, MSR A depends on MSR B which means MSR A must been set after MSR B has been set. Also MSR B is package scope level and MSR A is thread scope level. If system has multiple threads, Thread 1 needs to set the thread level MSRs and thread 2 needs to set thread and package level MSRs. Set MSRs task for thread 1 and thread 2 like below: Thread 1 Thread 2 MSR B N Y MSR A Y Y If driver don't control execute MSR order, for thread 1, it will execute MSR A first, but at this time, MSR B not been executed yet by thread 2. system may trig exception at this time. In order to fix the above issue, driver introduces semaphore logic to control the MSR execute sequence. For the above case, a semaphore will be add between MSR A and B for all threads. Semaphore has scope info for it. The possible scope value is core or package. For each thread, when it meets a semaphore during it set registers, it will 1) release semaphore (+1) for each threads in this core or package(based on the scope info for this semaphore) 2) acquire semaphore (-1) for all the threads in this core or package(based on the scope info for this semaphore). With these two steps, driver can control MSR sequence. Sample code logic like below: // // First increase semaphore count by 1 for processors in this package. // for (ProcessorIndex = 0; ProcessorIndex < PackageThreadsCount ; ProcessorIndex ++) { LibReleaseSemaphore ((UINT32 *) &SemaphorePtr[PackageOffset + ProcessorIndex]); } // // Second, check whether the count has reach the check number. // for (ProcessorIndex = 0; ProcessorIndex < ValidApCount; ProcessorIndex ++) { LibWaitForSemaphore (&SemaphorePtr[ApOffset]); } Platform Requirement: 1. This change requires register MSR setting base on MSR scope info. If still register MSR for all threads, exception may raised. Known limitation: 1. Current CpuFeatures driver supports DXE instance and PEI instance. But semaphore logic requires Aps execute in async mode which is not supported by PEI driver. So CpuFeature PEI instance not works after this change. We plan to support async mode for PEI in phase 2 for this task. Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
2018-10-17 03:31:03 +02:00
CpuFeaturesData
);
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
}
/**
Worker function to switch the requested AP to be the BSP from that point onward.
@param[in] ProcessorNumber The handle number of AP that is to become the new BSP.
**/
VOID
SwitchNewBsp (
IN UINTN ProcessorNumber
)
{
EFI_STATUS Status;
EFI_PEI_MP_SERVICES_PPI *CpuMpPpi;
//
// Get MP Services Protocol
//
Status = PeiServicesLocatePpi (
&gEfiPeiMpServicesPpiGuid,
0,
NULL,
(VOID **)&CpuMpPpi
);
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
//
// Wakeup all APs for data collection.
//
Status = CpuMpPpi->SwitchBSP (
GetPeiServicesTablePointer (),
CpuMpPpi,
ProcessorNumber,
TRUE
);
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
}
/**
Worker function to retrieve the number of logical processor in the platform.
@param[out] NumberOfCpus Pointer to the total number of logical
processors in the system, including the BSP
and disabled APs.
@param[out] NumberOfEnabledProcessors Pointer to the number of enabled logical
processors that exist in system, including
the BSP.
**/
VOID
GetNumberOfProcessor (
OUT UINTN *NumberOfCpus,
OUT UINTN *NumberOfEnabledProcessors
)
{
EFI_STATUS Status;
EFI_PEI_MP_SERVICES_PPI *CpuMpPpi;
//
// Get MP Services Protocol
//
Status = PeiServicesLocatePpi (
&gEfiPeiMpServicesPpiGuid,
0,
NULL,
(VOID **)&CpuMpPpi
);
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
//
// Get the number of CPUs
//
Status = CpuMpPpi->GetNumberOfProcessors (
GetPeiServicesTablePointer (),
CpuMpPpi,
NumberOfCpus,
NumberOfEnabledProcessors
);
ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
}
UefiCpuPkg/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib: Add logic to support semaphore type. V4 changes include: 1. Serial debug message for different threads when program the register table. V3 changes include: 1. Use global variable instead of internal function to return string for register type and dependence type. 2. Add comments for some complicated logic. V2 changes include: 1. Add more description for the code part which need easy to understand. 2. Refine some code base on feedback for V1 changes. V1 changes include: In a system which has multiple cores, current set register value task costs huge times. After investigation, current set MSR task costs most of the times. Current logic uses SpinLock to let set MSR task as an single thread task for all cores. Because MSR has scope attribute which may cause GP fault if multiple APs set MSR at the same time, current logic use an easiest solution (use SpinLock) to avoid this issue, but it will cost huge times. In order to fix this performance issue, new solution will set MSRs base on their scope attribute. After this, the SpinLock will not needed. Without SpinLock, new issue raised which is caused by MSR dependence. For example, MSR A depends on MSR B which means MSR A must been set after MSR B has been set. Also MSR B is package scope level and MSR A is thread scope level. If system has multiple threads, Thread 1 needs to set the thread level MSRs and thread 2 needs to set thread and package level MSRs. Set MSRs task for thread 1 and thread 2 like below: Thread 1 Thread 2 MSR B N Y MSR A Y Y If driver don't control execute MSR order, for thread 1, it will execute MSR A first, but at this time, MSR B not been executed yet by thread 2. system may trig exception at this time. In order to fix the above issue, driver introduces semaphore logic to control the MSR execute sequence. For the above case, a semaphore will be add between MSR A and B for all threads. Semaphore has scope info for it. The possible scope value is core or package. For each thread, when it meets a semaphore during it set registers, it will 1) release semaphore (+1) for each threads in this core or package(based on the scope info for this semaphore) 2) acquire semaphore (-1) for all the threads in this core or package(based on the scope info for this semaphore). With these two steps, driver can control MSR sequence. Sample code logic like below: // // First increase semaphore count by 1 for processors in this package. // for (ProcessorIndex = 0; ProcessorIndex < PackageThreadsCount ; ProcessorIndex ++) { LibReleaseSemaphore ((UINT32 *) &SemaphorePtr[PackageOffset + ProcessorIndex]); } // // Second, check whether the count has reach the check number. // for (ProcessorIndex = 0; ProcessorIndex < ValidApCount; ProcessorIndex ++) { LibWaitForSemaphore (&SemaphorePtr[ApOffset]); } Platform Requirement: 1. This change requires register MSR setting base on MSR scope info. If still register MSR for all threads, exception may raised. Known limitation: 1. Current CpuFeatures driver supports DXE instance and PEI instance. But semaphore logic requires Aps execute in async mode which is not supported by PEI driver. So CpuFeature PEI instance not works after this change. We plan to support async mode for PEI in phase 2 for this task. Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
2018-10-17 03:31:03 +02:00
/**
Performs CPU features Initialization.
This service will invoke MP service to perform CPU features
initialization on BSP/APs per user configuration.
@note This service could be called by BSP only.
**/
VOID
EFIAPI
CpuFeaturesInitialize (
VOID
)
{
CPU_FEATURES_DATA *CpuFeaturesData;
UINTN OldBspNumber;
CpuFeaturesData = GetCpuFeaturesData ();
OldBspNumber = GetProcessorIndex();
CpuFeaturesData->BspNumber = OldBspNumber;
//
// Known limitation: In PEI phase, CpuFeatures driver not
// support async mode execute tasks. So semaphore type
// register can't been used for this instance, must use
// DXE type instance.
//
//
// Wakeup all APs for programming.
//
StartupAPsWorker (SetProcessorRegister, NULL);
//
// Programming BSP
//
SetProcessorRegister (CpuFeaturesData);
//
// Switch to new BSP if required
//
if (CpuFeaturesData->BspNumber != OldBspNumber) {
SwitchNewBsp (CpuFeaturesData->BspNumber);
}
}