From 2cbfdae36e034e50fc4b5e9d9635e6ef1fe904f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: eric_tian Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 03:44:09 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] add comment on EFI_PROCESSOR_CORE_FREQUENCY_LIST_DATA to note there is gap between code and spec. git-svn-id: https://edk2.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/edk2/trunk/edk2@8800 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524 --- IntelFrameworkPkg/Include/Framework/DataHubRecords.h | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/IntelFrameworkPkg/Include/Framework/DataHubRecords.h b/IntelFrameworkPkg/Include/Framework/DataHubRecords.h index fa958b6535..62f0b1a56f 100644 --- a/IntelFrameworkPkg/Include/Framework/DataHubRecords.h +++ b/IntelFrameworkPkg/Include/Framework/DataHubRecords.h @@ -247,6 +247,9 @@ typedef EFI_EXP_BASE10_DATA EFI_PROCESSOR_CORE_FREQUENCY_DATA; /// The list is terminated by -1 in the Value field of the last element. A Value field of zero means /// that the processor/driver supports automatic frequency selection. /// +/// Inconsistent with specification here: +/// It's a typo of MiscSubclass 0.9 spec. It should be a pointer since it refers to a list of frequencies. +/// typedef EFI_EXP_BASE10_DATA *EFI_PROCESSOR_CORE_FREQUENCY_LIST_DATA; ///