REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3737
Apply uncrustify changes to .c/.h files in the MdePkg package
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
On some architectures, the maximum representable address deviates from
the virtual address range that is accessible by the firmware at boot
time. For instance, on AArch64, UEFI mandates a 4 KB page size, which
limits the address space to 48 bits, while more than that may be
populated on a particular platform, for use by the OS.
So introduce a new macro MAX_ALLOC_ADDRESS, which represent the maximum
address the firmware should take into account when allocating memory
ranges that need to be accessible by the CPU at boot time.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
This reverts commit 82379bf660.
On AArch64, we can only use 48 address bits while running in UEFI,
while the GCD and UEFI memory maps may describe up to 52 bits of
physical address space. For this reason, MAX_ADDRESS was reduced
to 48 bits, to ensure that the firmware does not inadvertently
attempt to allocate memory that we cannot access.
However, MAX_ADDRESS is used in runtime drivers as well, and
runtime drivers may deal with kernel virtual addresses, which have
bits [63:48] set. In fact, the OS may be running with 64 KB pages
and pass addresses into the runtime services that use up to 52
bits of address space, either with the top bits set or cleared,
even if the physical address space does not extend beyond 48 bits.
In summary, changing MAX_ADDRESS is a mistake, and needs to be
reverted.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
AArch64 supports the use of more than 48 bits for physical and/or
virtual addressing, but only if the page size is set to 64 KB,
which is not supported by UEFI. So redefine MAX_ADDRESS to cover
only 48 address bits.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
We disable the exact same warnings as IA32 and X64.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=798
SafeIntLib provides helper functions to prevent integer overflow
during type conversion, addition, subtraction, and multiplication.
Conversion Functions
====================
* Converting from a signed type to an unsigned type of the same
size, or vice-versa.
* Converting to a smaller type that could possibly overflow.
* Converting from a signed type to a larger unsigned type.
Unsigned Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication
===============================================
* Unsigned integer math functions protect from overflow and
underflow (in case of subtraction).
Signed Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication
============================================
* Strongly consider using unsigned numbers.
* Signed numbers are often used where unsigned numbers should
be used. For example file sizes and array indices should always
be unsigned. Subtracting a larger positive signed number from a
smaller positive signed number with SafeInt32Sub() will succeed,
producing a negative number, that then must not be used as an
array index (but can occasionally be used as a pointer index.)
Similarly for adding a larger magnitude negative number to a
smaller magnitude positive number.
* SafeIntLib does not protect you from such errors. It tells you
if your integer operations overflowed, not if you are doing the
right thing with your non-overflowed integers.
* Likewise you can overflow a buffer with a non-overflowed
unsigned index.
Based on content from the following branch/commits:
https://github.com/Microsoft/MS_UEFI/tree/share/MsCapsuleSupport21ef3a321cca516b1a6133bab4031a
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
clang, when used as a preprocessor for dtc, does not discard #pragma
statements although -x assembler-with-cpp is specified. This causes dtc
to barf at a #pragma pack() statement that is already filtered out for
__GNUC__. So add a check to also filter this out if __ASSEMBLER__.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The UEFI spec differs between architectures in the minimum alignment
and granularity of page allocations that are visible to the OS as
EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME regions.
So define macros that carry these values to the respective ProcessorBind.h
header files.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Correct the typos in some header files of MdePkg.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
When compiling with Clang, we still use GNU as for the assembler, so we still need to define the GCC_ASM* macros.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Olivier Martin <olivier.martin@arm.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@16282 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Some compilers may define __USER_LABEL_PREFIX__ to determine the
prefix used with ASM_PFX. Otherwise, IA32 will use a single underscore
'_' character, and all other architectures will use an empty prefix.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@16019 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524