InitRootBridge() in "OvmfPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c" passes the
EFI_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_COMBINE_MEM_PMEM allocation attribute to
RootBridgeConstructor(); we should do the same here.
From "MdePkg/Include/Protocol/PciHostBridgeResourceAllocation.h":
/// If this bit is set, then the PCI Root Bridge does not support separate
/// windows for Non-prefetchable and Prefetchable memory. A PCI bus driver
/// needs to include requests for Prefetchable memory in the
/// Non-prefetchable memory pool.
Which implies that both the 32-bit and 64-bit prefetchable MMIO apertures
should be marked empty. (The CreateRootBridge() function actually enforces
this in "MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciRootBridgeIo.c".)
Furthermore, since OvmfPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe does *not* set the
EFI_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_MEM64_DECODE allocation attribute:
/// If this bit is set, then the PCI Root Bridge supports 64 bit memory
/// windows. If this bit is not set, the PCI bus driver needs to include
/// requests for 64 bit memory address in the corresponding 32 bit memory
/// pool.
we follow suit in the PciHostBridgeLib instance.
In turn, the 64-bit MMIO apertures (both prefetchable and
non-prefetchable) should be marked empty.
MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe enforces this too.
(64-bit MMIO aperture support, based on yet more fw_cfg files, is a
planned future improvement.)
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
When this BOOLEAN member is FALSE, and the caller tries to set up a DMA
transfer between a PCI device and a host buffer not entirely under 4GB,
then "MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe" sets up a bounce buffer under
4GB, in the implementation of EFI_PCI_ROOT_BRIDGE_IO_PROTOCOL.Map().
Since that's exactly what RootBridgeIoMap() does in
"OvmfPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciRootBridgeIo.c", stick with it in this
conversion.
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
These settings are copied from the RootBridgeConstructor() function, file
"OvmfPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciRootBridgeIo.c".
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
This is the first of the patches that set the fields of PCI_ROOT_BRIDGE.
The structure is zero-filled as a precaution for later field additions.
Here we set the Segment member explicitly to zero (so that any later
customization can be easier).
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
This function has no counterpart in OvmfPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/, but the
PciHostBridgeLib class requires it.
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
In this patch we import the scan for extra root buses from the
InitializePciHostBridge() function, in file
"OvmfPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c".
For the time being, the InitRootBridge() and UninitRootBridge() functions
are just placeholders.
The PciHostBridgeGetRootBridges() API expects us to return the
PCI_ROOT_BRIDGE structures in a contiguous array, instead of a linked
list. Therefore the following bits have to be converted manually:
(1) The array is allocated in advance, in a single step.
(2) The calculation of the array size depends on an explicit
multiplication, which we must check against overflow. Since more than
255 extra root bridges make no sense anyway, we use (1 + 255) as the
limit on the main plus all extra root bridges. This also ensures that
the UINTN multiplication doesn't overflow.
(3) The PciHostBridgeDxe code decrements "ExtraRootBridgesLeft" to
terminate the scanning early. Here we need track the increasing count
of used array elements as well, so we employ "ExtraRootBridges" as a
constant limit, and increment the new local variable "Initialized".
(4) The prototypes of InitRootBridge() and UninitRootBridge() reflect that
the PCI_ROOT_BRIDGE structure is allocated by the caller; only
in-place initialization is necessary.
Additionally, macros are employed for standard PCI quantities, from
"MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Pci22.h":
- MAX_PCI_DEVICE_NUMBER (31) is replaced with PCI_MAX_DEVICE (same),
- the constant 255 is replaced with PCI_MAX_BUS,
- the (RootBridgeNumber < 256) condition is replaced with
(RootBridgeNumber <= PCI_MAX_BUS).
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
In this patch we clone "MdeModulePkg/Library/PciHostBridgeLibNull" for
customization under OvmfPkg. Differences relative to a verbatim copy:
- the Null suffix is dropped from file names,
- the UNI file is dropped, together with the corresponding MODULE_UNI_FILE
reference in the INF file,
- the INF file receives a new FILE_GUID,
- the top comments in the files mention OVMF, not a null instance.
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>