REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=917
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Steven Shi <steven.shi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration. This patch
ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration. This patch
ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration. This patch
ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=937
In NvmeExpressPassthru.c near line 659:
Prp = NvmeCreatePrpList (
PciIo,
PhyAddr,
EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES(Offset + Bytes) - 1,
&PrpListHost,
&PrpListNo,
&MapPrpList
);
if (Prp == NULL) {
goto EXIT;
}
Status is not set to an error code - Status is initialized to
EFI_SUCCESS, or set by a PciIo->Map to EFI_SUCCESS above this
code. This error path should set Status to an error code before
goto EXIT.
Change-Id: I8a5cdf981aa609534c205d3676395805ac60a003
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Turner <Michael.Turner@microsoft.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=933
We see UEFI spec is saying to use EfiBootServicesData for ESRT table.
UEFI 2.7 chapter 23.3:
The ESRT shall be stored in memory of type EfiBootServicesData.
And we see EsrtDxe is using AllocatePool for ESRT table, but
EsrtFmpDxe is using AllocateRuntimeZeroPool for ESRT table.
This patch updates code to use EfiBootServicesData for ESRT table
in EsrtFmpDxe.
Change-Id: I72a73e0cc0a37e429cc262d68eb284fb268cb5ef
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Clean up the leading comment and the prototype of
EfiBootManagerAddLoadOptionVariable():
- the function may modify Option on output, annotate the parameter with
OUT and update the documentation;
- "@retval EFI_STATUS" and "@retval Others" are not idiomatic
documentation, use @return instead;
- sync comment and prototype between lib instance and lib class header.
Change-Id: I8a609d6502b6f8929b2f568acaa147065003b6f4
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
We have updated performance infrastructure in previous commits:
between
73fef64f14
and
115eae650b
Update FPDT drivers to collect the performance data reported by
gEdkiiFpdtExtendedFirmwarePerformanceGuid.
The old implementation which collected performance data through
gEfiFirmwarePerformanceGuid is not supported now.
We should add error message to remind user for this unsupported
case in case anyone use it by mistake.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
This patch fixes an issue introduced by commit
5b91bf82c6
and
0c9f2cb10b
This issue will only happen if PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy is
enabled for reserved memory, which will mark SMM RAM as NX (non-
executable) during DXE core initialization. SMM IPL driver will
unset the NX attribute for SMM RAM to allow loading and running
SMM core/drivers.
But above commit will fail the unset operation of the NX attribute
due to a fact that SMM RAM has zero cache attribute (MRC code always
sets 0 attribute to reserved memory), which will cause GCD internal
method ConverToCpuArchAttributes() to return 0 attribute, which is
taken as invalid CPU paging attribute and skip the calling of
gCpu->SetMemoryAttributes().
The solution is to make use of existing functionality in PiSmmIpl
to make sure one cache attribute is set for SMM RAM. For performance
consideration, PiSmmIpl will always try to set SMM RAM to write-back.
But there's a hole in the code which will fail the setting write-back
attribute because of no corresponding cache capabilities. This patch
will add necessary cache capabilities before setting corresponding
attributes.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Heap Guard feature needs enough memory and paging to work. Otherwise
calling SetMemoryAttributes to change page attribute will fail. This
patch add necessary check of result of calling SetMemoryAttributes.
This can help users to debug their problem in enabling this feature.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Heap Guard feature needs enough memory and paging to work. Otherwise
calling SetMemoryAttributes to change page attribute will fail. This
patch add necessary check of result of calling SetMemoryAttributes.
This can help users to debug their problem in enabling this feature.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
It is caused by 0c9f2cb10b
and false positive.
Initialize CpuArchAttributes to suppress incorrect
compiler/analyzer warnings.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
This patch fixes an issue with VlvTbltDevicePkg introduced
by commit 5b91bf82c6.
The history is as below.
To support heap guard feature, 14dde9e903
added support for SetMemorySpaceAttributes() to handle page attributes,
but after that, a combination of CPU arch attributes and other attributes
was not allowed anymore, for example, UC + RUNTIME. It is a regression.
Then 5b91bf82c6 was to fix the regression,
and we thought 0 CPU arch attributes may be used to clear CPU arch
attributes, so 0 CPU arch attributes was allowed to be sent to
gCpu->SetMemoryAttributes().
But some implementation of CPU driver may return error for 0 CPU arch
attributes. That fails the case that caller just calls
SetMemorySpaceAttributes() with none CPU arch attributes (for example,
RUNTIME), and the purpose of the case is not to clear CPU arch attributes.
This patch filters the call to gCpu->SetMemoryAttributes()
if the requested attributes is 0. It also removes the #define
INVALID_CPU_ARCH_ATTRIBUTES that is no longer used.
Cc: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Yi Li <phoenix.liyi@huawei.com>
Cc: Renhao Liang <liangrenhao@huawei.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
1. Fix some "support" to "supported".
2. Fix some "set" to "clear" in ClearMemoryAttributes interface.
3. Remove redundant comments for GetMemoryAttributes interface.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
For gDS->SetMemorySpaceAttributes(), when user passes a combined
memory attribute including CPU arch attribute and other attributes,
like EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME, ConverToCpuArchAttributes() will return
INVALID_CPU_ARCH_ATTRIBUTES and skip setting page/cache attribute for
the specified memory space.
We don't see any reason to forbid combining CPU arch attributes and
non-CPU-arch attributes when calling gDS->SetMemorySpaceAttributes(),
so we remove the check code in ConverToCpuArchAttributes(); the
remaining code is enough to grab the interested bits for
Cpu->SetMemoryAttributes().
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Yi Li <phoenix.liyi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Renhao Liang <liangrenhao@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
The variable driver doesn't distinguish "non-volatile non-authenticated"
variables from "volatile non-authenticated" variables, when checking
individual variable sizes against the permitted maximum.
PcdMaxVariableSize covers both kinds.
This prevents volatile non-authenticated variables from carrying large
data between UEFI drivers, despite having no flash impact. One example is
EFI_TLS_CA_CERTIFICATE_VARIABLE, which platforms might want to create as
volatile on every boot: the certificate list can be several hundred KB in
size.
Introduce PcdMaxVolatileVariableSize to represent the limit on individual
volatile non-authenticated variables. The default value is zero, which
makes Variable/RuntimeDxe fall back to PcdMaxVariableSize (i.e. the
current behavior). This is similar to the PcdMaxAuthVariableSize fallback.
Whenever the size limit is enforced, consult MaxVolatileVariableSize as
the last option, after checking
- MaxAuthVariableSize for VARIABLE_ATTRIBUTE_AT_AW,
- and MaxVariableSize for EFI_VARIABLE_NON_VOLATILE.
EFI_VARIABLE_HARDWARE_ERROR_RECORD is always handled separately; it always
takes priority over the three cases listed above.
Introduce the GetMaxVariableSize() helper to consider
PcdMaxVolatileVariableSize, in addition to
GetNonVolatileMaxVariableSize(). GetNonVolatileMaxVariableSize() is
currently called at three sites, and two of those need to start using
GetMaxVariableSize() instead:
- VariableServiceInitialize() [VariableSmm.c]: the SMM comms buffer must
accommodate all kinds of variables,
- VariableCommonInitialize() [Variable.c]: the preallocated scratch space
must also accommodate all kinds of variables,
- InitNonVolatileVariableStore() [Variable.c] can continue using
GetNonVolatileMaxVariableSize().
Don't modify the ReclaimForOS() function as it is specific to non-volatile
variables and should ignore PcdMaxVolatileVariableSize.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
Tested-by: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: set MaxVolatileVariableSize where Star suggested]
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
VariableRuntimeDxe will have OnEndOfDxe() callback function at
TPL_NOTIFY level on EndOfDxe event when DXE variable solution is
used.
Status = gBS->CreateEventEx (
EVT_NOTIFY_SIGNAL,
TPL_NOTIFY,
OnEndOfDxe,
NULL,
&gEfiEndOfDxeEventGroupGuid,
&EndOfDxeEvent
);
VariableSmm will have SmmEndOfDxeCallback() callback function at
TPL_CALLBACK level on SmmEndOfDxe event when SMM variable solution
is used.
SmmIplGuidedEventNotify() - PiSmmIpl.c TPL_CALLBACK on EndOfDxe
->
SmmEndOfDxeHandler() - PiSmmCore.c install SmmEndOfDxe protocol
->
SmmEndOfDxeCallback() - VariableSmm.c
The TPL level for (Smm)EndOfDxe callback between VariableRuntimeDxe
and VariableSmm is inconsistent, it will make the unified platform
code could not make sure its TPL_NOTIFY EndOfDxe callback function
(to use variable lock/check) executed before (Smm)EndOfDxe callback
function in variable driver. The variable lock/check will start to
protect after (Smm)EndOfDxe callback function in variable driver is
executed.
This patch is to algin the TPL level to TPL_CALLBACK for (Smm)EndOfDxe
callback between VariableRuntimeDxe and VariableSmm.
Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Add the partition type GUID for every partition to the installed handle,
this is required per the UEFI specification.
"The firmware must add the PartitionTypeGuid to the handle of every
active GPT partition using EFI_BOOT_SERVICES.InstallProtocolInterface()."
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen.qdt@qualcommdatacenter.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Booting from USB may fail while the macro USB_BOOT_IO_BLOCKS
set to 128 because the block size of some USB devices are exceeded
512, like some virtual CD-ROM from BMC, the block size is 2048.
So,the count blocks to transfer should be calculated by block
size of the USB devices.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ming Huang <ming.huang@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Commit 5563281fa2
* ShellPkg/[hex]edit: use SimpleTextInEx to read console
changes shell edit and hexedit to read input through SimpleTextInEx.
It exposes a issue in UsbKeyboard driver:
Per UEFI Spec,
When interpreting the data from this function (ReadKeyStrokeEx), it
should be noted that if a class of printable characters that are
normally adjusted by shift modifiers (e.g. Shift Key + "f" key) would
be presented solely as a KeyData.Key.UnicodeChar without the
associated shift state. So in the previous example of a Shift Key +
"f" key being pressed, the only pertinent data returned would be
KeyData.Key.UnicodeChar with the value of "F".
UsbKeyboard driver does convert Shift Key + "f" to "F" without the
shift state. But it doesn't do the conversion for all printable
characters, e.g.: Shift Key + "1" --> "!".
The root cause is today's logic to check whether a character is
printable or not is as below:
if ((KeyDescriptor->AffectedAttribute & EFI_AFFECTED_BY_CAPS_LOCK)
!= 0) {
So it only converts Shift + "a"-"z", but doesn't for Shift + "0"-"9",
and Shift + "["...
The patch updates the check logic as below to fix the issue:
if ((KeyDescriptor->Unicode != CHAR_NULL) &&
(KeyDescriptor->ShiftedUnicode != CHAR_NULL) &&
(KeyDescriptor->Unicode != KeyDescriptor->ShiftedUnicode)) {
The above check is TRUE when the character is printable and
it's *really* affected by Shift key.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905
Fix pointer math when more than one capsule is passed
to the CapsuleApp. Use the ContinuationPointer from
the last array entry instead of the first array entry.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Within function CoreExitBootServices(), this commit will move the call
of:
MemoryProtectionExitBootServicesCallback();
before:
SaveAndSetDebugTimerInterrupt (FALSE);
and
gCpu->DisableInterrupt (gCpu);
The reason is that, within MemoryProtectionExitBootServicesCallback(),
APIs like RaiseTpl and RestoreTpl maybe called. An example will be:
DebugLib (using PeiDxeDebugLibReportStatusCode instance)
|
v
ReportStatusCodeLib (using DxeReportStatusCodeLib instance)
|
v
Raise/RestoreTpl
The call of Raise/RestoreTpl APIs will re-enable BSP interrupts. Hence,
this commit refine the calling sequence to ensure BSP interrupts before
leaving CoreExitBootServices().
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
SMM core will add a HEADER before each allocated pool memory and clean
up this header once it's freed. If a block of allocated pool is marked
as read-only after allocation (EfiRuntimeServicesCode type of pool in
SMM will always be marked as read-only), #PF exception will be triggered
during memory pool freeing.
Normally EfiRuntimeServicesCode type of pool should not be freed in the
real world. But some test suites will actually do memory free for all
types of memory for the purpose of functionality and conformance test.
So this issue should be fixed anyway.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
If given address is on 64K boundary and the requested bit number is 64,
all SetBits(), ClearBits() and GetBits() will encounter ASSERT problem
in trying to do a 64 bits of shift, which is not allowed by LShift() and
RShift(). This patch tries to fix this issue by turning bits operation
into whole integer operation in such situation.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
If given address is on 64K boundary and the requested bit number is 64,
all SetBits(), ClearBits() and GetBits() will encounter ASSERT problem
in trying to do a 64 bits of shift, which is not allowed by LShift() and
RShift(). This patch tries to fix this issue by turning bits operation
into whole integer operation in such situation.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Due to the fact that HeapGuard needs CpuArchProtocol to update page
attributes, the feature is normally enabled after CpuArchProtocol is
installed. Since there're some drivers are loaded before CpuArchProtocl,
they cannot make use HeapGuard feature to detect potential issues.
This patch fixes above situation by updating the DXE core to skip the
NULL check against global gCpu in the IsMemoryTypeToGuard(), and adding
NULL check against gCpu in SetGuardPage() and UnsetGuardPage() to make
sure that they can be called but do nothing. This will allow HeapGuard to
record all guarded memory without setting the related Guard pages to not-
present.
Once the CpuArchProtocol is installed, a protocol notify will be called
to complete the work of setting Guard pages to not-present.
Please note that above changes will cause a #PF in GCD code during cleanup
of map entries, which is initiated by CpuDxe driver to update real mtrr
and paging attributes back to GCD. During that time, CpuDxe doesn't allow
GCD to update memory attributes and then any Guard page cannot be unset.
As a result, this will prevent Guarded memory from freeing during memory
map cleanup.
The solution is to avoid allocating guarded memory as memory map entries
in GCD code. It's done by setting global mOnGuarding to TRUE before memory
allocation and setting it back to FALSE afterwards in GCD function
CoreAllocateGcdMapEntry().
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
This change is to avoid the function conflict.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
According to UEFI spec 2.7, PciIo->GetBarAttributes should return host
address (CPU view ddress) rather than device address (PCI view
address), and
device address = host address + address translation offset,
so we subtract translation from device address before returning.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Yi Li <phoenix.liyi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ni Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
According to UEFI spec 2.7, PciRootBridgeIo->Configuration() should
return host address (CPU view ddress) rather than device address
(PCI view address), so in function GetMmioAddressTranslationOffset we
need to convert the range to device address before comparing.
And device address = host address + translation offset.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Yi Li <phoenix.liyi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ni Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
PCI address translation is necessary for some non-x86 platforms. On
such platforms, address value (denoted as "device address" or "address
in PCI view") set to PCI BAR registers in configuration space might be
different from the address which is used by CPU to access the
registers in memory BAR or IO BAR spaces (denoted as "host address" or
"address in CPU view"). The difference between the two addresses is
called "Address Translation Offset" or simply "translation", and can
be represented by "Address Translation Offset" in ACPI QWORD Address
Space Descriptor (Offset 0x1E). However UEFI and ACPI differs on the
definitions of QWORD Address Space Descriptor, and we will follow UEFI
definition on UEFI protocols, such as PCI root bridge IO protocol and
PCI IO protocol. In UEFI 2.7, "Address Translation Offset" is "Offset
to apply to the Starting address to convert it to a PCI address". This
means:
1. Translation = device address - host address.
2. PciRootBridgeIo->Configuration should return CPU view address, as
well as PciIo->GetBarAttributes.
Summary of addresses used in protocol interfaces and internal
implementations:
1. *Only* the following protocol interfaces assume Address is Device
Address:
(1). PciHostBridgeResourceAllocation.GetProposedResources()
Otherwise PCI bus driver cannot set correct address into PCI
BARs.
(2). PciRootBridgeIo.Mem.Read() and PciRootBridgeIo.Mem.Write()
(3). PciRootBridgeIo.CopyMem()
UEFI and PI spec have clear statements for all other protocol
interfaces about the address type.
2. Library interfaces and internal implementation:
(1). Base and Limit in PCI_ROOT_BRIDGE_APERTURE are device address.
It is easy to check whether the address is below 4G or above 4G.
(2). Addresses in PCI_ROOT_BRIDGE_INSTANCE.ResAllocNode are host
address, for they are allocated from GCD.
(3). Address passed to PciHostBridgeResourceConflict is host address,
for it comes from PCI_ROOT_BRIDGE_INSTANCE.ResAllocNode.
RESTRICTION: to simplify the situation, we require the alignment of
Translation must be larger than any BAR alignment in the same root
bridge, so that resource allocation alignment can be applied to both
device address and host address.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Yi Li <phoenix.liyi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ni Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Add Translation field to PCI_ROOT_BRIDGE_APERTURE. Translation is used
to represent the difference between device address and host address,
if they are not the same on some platforms.
In UEFI 2.7, "Address Translation Offset" is "Offset to apply to the
Starting address to convert it to a PCI address". This means:
Translation = device address - host address
So we also use the above calculation for this Translation field to
keep consistent.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Yi Li <phoenix.liyi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ni Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
This patch fixes the same issues in Heap Guard in DXE core, which is fixed
in another patch.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
There're two ASSERT issues which will be triggered by boot loader of
Windows 10.
The first is caused by allocating memory in heap guard during another
memory allocation, which is not allowed in DXE core. Avoiding reentry
of memory allocation has been considered in heap guard feature. But
there's a hole in the code of function FindGuardedMemoryMap(). The fix
is adding AllocMapUnit parameter in the condition of while(), which
will prevent memory allocation from happenning during Guard page
check operation.
The second is caused by the core trying to allocate page 0 with Guard
page, which will cause the start address rolling back to the end of
supported system address. According to the requirement of heap guard,
the fix is just simply skipping the free memory at page 0 and let
the core continue searching free memory after it.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Remove PCD_TYPE_SKU_ENABLED in PCD_TYPE_ALL_SET.
This change was missing at e8d2a98052.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Tested-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
The incorrect return status was caused by the commit of 39b0867d, which
was to resolve the token status error that does not compliance with spec
definition, but it results the protocol status not compliance with spec
definition.
This patch is to resolve above issue.
Cc: Wang Fan <fan.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Fu Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Cc: Ye Ting <ting.ye@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Fu Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Wang, Fan <fan.wang@intel.com>
PcdDb optimization has handled PCD DB for each SKU, not for single PCD.
So, this PCD attribute is not used any more.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
With this flag, the LockBox can be restored in S3 resume only.
The LockBox can not be restored after SmmReadyToLock in normal boot
and after EndOfS3Resume in S3 resume.
It can not be set together with LOCK_BOX_ATTRIBUTE_RESTORE_IN_PLACE.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
The root cause is an unnecessary check to Size parameter in function
AdjustMemoryS(). It will cause one standalone free page (happen to have
Guard page around) in the free memory list cannot be allocated, even if
the requested memory size is less than a page.
//
// At least one more page needed for Guard page.
//
if (Size < (SizeRequested + EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE (1))) {
return 0;
}
The following code in the same function actually covers above check
implicitly. So the fix is simply removing above check.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
The example of UNION storage is not good, now update it.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
If enabled, NX memory protection feature will mark some types of active
memory as NX (non-executable), which includes the first page of the stack.
This will overwrite the attributes of the first page of the stack if the
stack guard feature is also enabled.
The solution is to override the attributes setting to the first page of
the stack by adding back the 'EFI_MEMORY_RP' attribute when the stack
guard feature is enabled.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
The commit rewrites the logic in function
InitializeDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy() for handling the first page
(page 0) when NULL pointer detection feature is enabled.
Instead of skip setting the page 0, the codes will now override the
attribute setting of page 0 by adding the 'EFI_MEMORY_RP' attribute.
The purpose is to make it easy for other special handling of pages
(e.g. the first page of the stack when stack guard feature is enabled).
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Function BmRepairAllControllers may recursively call itself if some
driver health protocol returns EfiDriverHealthStatusReconnectRequired.
However, driver health protocol of some buggy third party driver may
always return such status even after one and another reconnect. The
endless iteration will cause stack overflow and then system exception,
and it may be not easy to find that the exception is actually caused
by stack overflow.
So we limit the number of reconnect retry to 10 to improve code
robustness, and DEBUG_CODE is moved ahead before recursive repair to
track the repair result.
We also remove a duplicated declaration of BmRepairAllControllers() in
InternalBm.h in this patch, for it is only a trivial change.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
CompatibleRangeTest() contains two bugs:
1. It doesn't reject the memory above 16MB
2. it cannot handle the case when the partial or whole range of
requested memory is already tested.
The patch fixes the two bugs.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The patch should not impact the functionality.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Because terminal doesn't support shift and toggle key state,
ReadKeyStrokeEx just sets the two states to 0.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Ruiyu Ni
Thomas Palmer
Star Zeng
Dandan Bi
Jian J Wang
Kinney, Michael D
Heyi Guo
Laszlo Ersek
Jeff Brasen
Ming Huang
Hao Wu
Liming Gao
Jiaxin Wu
Marc-André Lureau