This solution is equivalent to DXE core.
AllocatePool() allocates POOL_TAIL after the buffer.
This POOL_TAIL is checked at FreePool().
If the there is buffer overflow, the issue can be caught at FreePool().
This patch could also handle the eight-byte aligned allocation
requirement. The discussion related to the eight-byte aligned
allocation requirement is at
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2017-April/009995.html.
According to the PI spec (Vol 4, Section 3.2 SmmAllocatePool()):
The SmmAllocatePool() function ... All allocations are eight-byte aligned.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Issue reported at bugzillar 445.
Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370
Use GLOBAL_REMOVE_IF_UNREFERENCED for some SMRAM profile global variables,
then their symbols could be removed when SMRAM profile is disabled.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
The reason is that we observe that a platform may use same Handler
for different context.
In order to support Unregister such handler, we have to input
context information as well.
Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Remove the local definitions for the default and runtime page allocation
granularity macros, and switch to the new MdePkg versions.
Note that this replaces a reference to the 'default' version with the
more correct 'runtime' version, but this matters little in practice.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
There are cases that the operands of an expression are all with rank less
than UINT64/INT64 and the result of the expression is explicitly cast to
UINT64/INT64 to fit the target size.
An example will be:
UINT32 a,b;
// a and b can be any unsigned int type with rank less than UINT64, like
// UINT8, UINT16, etc.
UINT64 c;
c = (UINT64) (a + b);
Some static code checkers may warn that the expression result might
overflow within the rank of "int" (integer promotions) and the result is
then cast to a bigger size.
The commit refines codes by the following rules:
1). When the expression is possible to overflow the range of unsigned int/
int:
c = (UINT64)a + b;
2). When the expression will not overflow within the rank of "int", remove
the explicit type casts:
c = a + b;
3). When the expression will be cast to pointer of possible greater size:
UINT32 a,b;
VOID *c;
c = (VOID *)(UINTN)(a + b); --> c = (VOID *)((UINTN)a + b);
4). When one side of a comparison expression contains only operands with
rank less than UINT32:
UINT8 a;
UINT16 b;
UINTN c;
if ((UINTN)(a + b) > c) {...} --> if (((UINT32)a + b) > c) {...}
For rule 4), if we remove the 'UINTN' type cast like:
if (a + b > c) {...}
The VS compiler will complain with warning C4018 (signed/unsigned
mismatch, level 3 warning) due to promoting 'a + b' to type 'int'.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
1) SmmCore maintains the root SMI handler and NULL SMI handler
database.
2) SmmCore consumes PcdSmiHandlerProfilePropertyMask to decide
if SmmCore need support SMI handler profile.
If SMI handler profile is supported, the SmmCore installs
SMI handler profile protocol and SMI handler profile
communication handler.
3) SMI handler profile protocol will record the hardware SMI
handler profile registered by SmmChildDispatcher.
4) SMI handler profile communication handler will return all
SMI handler profile info (NULL SMI handler, GUID SMI handler,
and hardware SMI handler)
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
PiSmmIpl records LoadModuleAtFixAddressSmramBase in LMFAConfigurationTable.
Update PiSmmCore to directly get the address from this system table.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Allocate the additional Smram range to describe the reserved smram for
SMM core and driver when LMFA feature is enabled.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=278
Zero memory address or zero number pages are invalid to SmmFreePages().
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE only handles UINTN, so we use EfiPagesToSize
to handle UINT64.
Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Current memory attribute table implementation will only mark PE code
to be EfiRuntimeServicesCode, and mark rest to be EfiRuntimeServicesData.
However, there might be a case that a SMM code wants to allocate
EfiRuntimeServicesCode explicitly to let page table protect this region
to be read only. It is unsupported.
This patch enhances the current solution so that MemoryAttributeTable
does not touch non PE image record.
Only the PE image region is forced to be EfiRuntimeServicesCode for
code and EfiRuntimeServicesData for data.
Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
PiSmmCore supports page level protection based upon the Memory Type
(EfiRuntimeServicesCode/EfiRuntimeServicesData) and PE image.
However, the Memory Type information is ignored in AllocatePool().
If a caller calls AllocatePool with EfiRuntimeServicesCode,
the final memory is still allocated as EfiRuntimeServicesData.
This patch supports AllocatePool with EfiRuntimeServicesCode.
Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Add the comments to describe Free and Allocated SMRAM are added separately.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
gSmmCorePrivate->CommunicationBuffer and gSmmCorePrivate->BufferSize locate at
runtime memory region. That means they could be modified by non-SMM code during
runtime.
We should cache them into SMM local variables before we verify them. After
verification, we should use the cached ones directly instead of the ones in
gSmmCorePrivate.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
The SMM memory attribute table concept is similar to UEFI
memory attribute table.
The new file MdeModulePkg/Core/PiSmmCore/MemoryAttributesTable.c
and the new code in MdeModulePkg/Core/PiSmmCore/Page.c
are based on the algorithms and implementation from
MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryAttributesTable.c
and MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c.
These new components are based on the Memory Attributes Table
feature from the UEFI Specification and the existing DXE Core
implementation that supports that feature.
This SMM MemoryAttributes table is produced at SmmEndOfDxe event.
So that the consumer (PiSmmCpu) may consult this table
to set memory attribute in page table.
This patch also installs LoadedImage protocol to SMM
protocol database, so that the SMM image info can be
got easily to construct the PiSmmMemoryAttributes table.
Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Instead of comparing a GUID with gZeroGuid via the CompareGuid API, the
commit uses the IsZeroGuid API to check if the given GUID is a zero GUID.
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@Intel.com>
Code logic ensures that the pointer 'DriverInfoData' will not be NULL when
it is used.
Add ASSERT as warning for case that will not happen.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
- abstrated to abstracted
- accessibla to accessible
- addres to address
- apropriate to appropriate
- arry to array
- availabe to available
- avaliable to available
- becasue to because
- correponding to corresponding
- etablished to established
- exeuction to execution
- extensiable to extensible
- fileds to fields
- loadding to loading
- ptototypes to prototypes
- prococol protocol
- requried to required
- resoruce to resource
- runing to running
- uild to build
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Giri P Mudusuru <giri.p.mudusuru@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Code logic ensures that both pointers 'DriverInfoData' and 'AllocInfoData'
will not be NULL when they are used.
Add ASSERTs as warning for cases that will not happen.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
1. Produce SMM memory profile protocol.
2. Consume PcdMemoryProfilePropertyMask to support disable recording
at the start.
3. Consume PcdMemoryProfileDriverPath to control which drivers need
memory profile data.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
PI specification Vol 4 - SMM does not have any limitation of BASE_4GB for SMM.
So we should replace BASE_4GB check with MAX_ADDRESS check to make sure
the SMM memory is accessible by SMM Core.
Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
According to PI specification, EndOfDxe Event should be signaled before
DxeSmmReadyToLock protocol installation. This update is ASSERT if EndOfDxe
Event is not signaled when DxeSmmReadyToLock protocol installed. And do
REPORT_STATUS_CODE() also.
Cc: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
This patch enhance SMM memory profile SMM communication by using fixed
SMM communication buffer.
Update PiSmmCore to handle SMRAM_PROFILE_COMMAND_GET_PROFILE_DATA_BY_OFFSET
request.
This is designed to meet Microsoft WSMT table definition on FIXED_COMM_BUFFERS
requirement.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
We had put communication buffer to Runtime memory,
so that SMI handler can know it is not used by OS.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18949 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
PiSmmCore installs LoadedImage for each SMM driver. However itself is missing.
So we follow DxeCore style, let PiSmmCore installs LoadedImage protocol for itself,
then the SMM image information is complete.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18945 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Original code does not uninstall LoadedImage protocol if SMM driver returns error and is unloaded.
It causes a wrong LoadedImage protocol existing in system.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18936 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Original code refers FreePoolHdr without check Status. It is obvious wrong and has risk.
Aslo, if InternalAllocPoolByIndex() returns an error, then *FreePoolHdr is assigned to an uninitialized value. So we init Hdr be NULL.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Fan, Jeff" <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18932 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
A subset of fields in the EFI_SMM_SYSTEM_TABLE2 structure are identical
to the fields in the SMM_ENTRY_CONTEXT structure. CopyMem() is used to
transfer the contents of the SMM_ENTRY_CONTEXT structure into the
EFI_SMM_SYSTEM_TABLE2. This is confusing because SMM_ENTRY_CONTEXT is
not used in the declaration of EFI_SMM_SYSTEM_TABLE2 and field contents
are transferred without any reference to individual field names (e.g.
CurrentlyExecutingCpu). In order to make the code easier to maintain
and understand, the CopyMem() is replaced with statements that transfer
each field of SMM_ENTRY_CONTEXT into EFI_SMM_SYSTEM_TABLE2.
Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Link: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bios.edk2.devel/3567
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18716 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
InternalIsBufferOverlapped() is created to check overlap between buffers.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18312 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
to instead of AllocatePool() to ensure the data is clean for
the following consumption.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18087 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
that assumes the SMRAM reserved range is only at the end of the SMRAM descriptor.
//
// This range has reserved area, calculate the left free size
//
gSmmCorePrivate->SmramRanges[Index].PhysicalSize = SmramResRegion->SmramReservedStart - gSmmCorePrivate->SmramRanges[Index].CpuStart;
Imagine the following scenario where we just reserve the first page of the SMRAM range:
SMRAM Descriptor:
Start: 0x80000000
Size: 0x02000000
Reserved Range:
Start: 0x80000000
Size: 0x00001000
In this case the adjustment to the SMRAM range size yields zero: ReservedStart - SMRAM Start is 0x80000000 - 0x80000000 = 0.
So even though most of the range is still free the IPL code decides its unusable.
The problem comes from the email thread: [edk2] PiSmmIpl SMRAM Reservation Logic.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bios.tianocore.devel/15268
Also to follow the idea in the email thread, the patch is to
1. Keep only one copy of full SMRAM ranges in gSmmCorePrivate->SmramRanges,
split record for SmmConfiguration->SmramReservedRegions and SMM Core that
will be marked to be EFI_ALLOCATED in gSmmCorePrivate->SmramRanges.
2. Handle SmmConfiguration->SmramReservedRegions at beginning of, at end of,
in the middle of, or cross multiple SmramRanges.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18031 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
And also SMM Ready To Boot.
The SMM Exit Boot Service protocol is to be published by the SMM
Foundation code to associate with EFI_EVENT_GROUP_EXIT_BOOT_SERVICES
to notify SMM driver that system enter exit boot services.
The SMM Legacy Boot protocol is to be published by the SMM
Foundation code to associate with EFI_EVENT_LEGACY_BOOT_GUID
to notify SMM driver that system enter legacy boot.
The SMM Ready To Boot protocol is to be published by the SMM
Foundation code to associate with EFI_EVENT_GROUP_READY_TO_BOOT
to notify SMM driver that system enter ready to boot.
After them, any SMM drivers can get protocol notify on what happened
in DXE phase, then there is no need to let each individual SMM driver
to register SMM Communication Handler for that.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17657 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
1. In PiSmmIpl.c, free FullSmramRanges at error condition.
2. Move pool and page management definitions and structures
from PiSmmCorePrivateData.h to PiSmmCore.h.
PiSmmCorePrivateData.h should be only used to share SMM_CORE_PRIVATE_DATA
between PiSmmCore and PiSmmIpl. Pool and page management definitions
and structures were moved from Pool.c and Page.c to PiSmmCorePrivateData.h
incorrectly for memory profile feature at EDK2 R16335 commit.
3. DumpSmramInfo() only used for memory profile, so move the declaration
into SmramProfileRecord.c.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17598 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
When the ExecuteSmmCoreFromSmram() function fails, SmmIplEntry()
restores the SMRAM range to EFI_MEMORY_UC. However, it saves the
return value of gDS->SetMemorySpaceAttributes() in the same Status
variable that gDS->contains the return value of ExecuteSmmCoreFromSmram().
Therefore, if gDS->SetMemorySpaceAttributes() succeeds, the failure
of ExecuteSmmCoreFromSmram() is masked, and Bad Things Happen (TM).
Introduce a temporary variable just for the return value of
gDS->SetMemorySpaceAttributes().
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17417 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
PI 1.4 clarified SMM register protocol notify function return status as below:
EFI_SUCCESS Successfully returned the registration record that has
been added or unhooked
EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER Protocol is NULL or Registration is NULL
The implementation of SmmRegisterProtocolNotify() already followed this new
rule, needn't to be updated.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17349 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
If CommunicationBuffer is not in valid address scope, return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jeff Fan <Jeff.fan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@16486 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Star Zeng
Hao Wu
Jiewen Yao
Ard Biesheuvel
Liming Gao
Dandan Bi
Jeff Fan
Laszlo Ersek
Gary Lin
Giri P Mudusuru
Jordan Justen
Michael Kinney
Zachary Bobroff