REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2670
The RSC router data buffer may be reallocated when the buffer is nearing
exhaustion (7/8 portion of the buffer used).
While several pointers are updated to point to the newly allocated buffer,
the RscData is not updated. This commit updates the RSC data pointer
to the same offset in the reallocated data buffer.
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Kun Qin <Kun.Qin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2669
Updates ReportDispatcher() to take the size in the HeaderSize field in
a EFI_STATUS_CODE_DATA element into account when walking the data buffer.
This size will cause the header size to differ from the compiled sizeof
header.
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Kun Qin <Kun.Qin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2665
ReportDispatcher() is called by a software module to report a status code.
The interface is generic and can be called frequently throughout the boot
under various conditions. A certain set of conditions can cause the
currently implemented algorithm for resource exhaustion to fail. A sample
scenario:
1. ReportStatusCode() is called at a TPL higher than one of the registered
status code listeners making the call to the listener deferred until
TPL is lowered.
2. Additional calls to ReportStatusCode() occur, so the data buffer
continues to expand.
3. A call to ReportStatusCode() is made from within a memory allocation
call (e.g. CoreAllocatePoolPages ()) which is protected from re-
entrancy with mPoolMemoryLock. This will cause the ReallocatePool()
call in ReportDispatcher() to fail. Because the end pointer was already
moved to account for the data size, the end pointer is now moved
beyond the buffer and invalid.
This commit saves the original end pointer value into a local variable
called "FailSafeEndPointer" which tracks a safe end pointer to revert to
in the case the allocated buffer size (CallbackEntry->EndPointer -
CallbackEntry->StatusCodeDataBuffer) is still not large enough for the
data.
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Kun Qin <Kun.Qin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1969
ReportDispatcher() may be invoked with a NULL Data argument. When TPL is
less than TPL_HIGH_LEVEL and Data is NULL, the EFI_STATUS_CODE_DATA
structure inside RscData should be cleared so listeners will not receive
data from a previous operation.
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Kun Qin <Kun.Qin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Removing rules for Ipf sources file:
* Remove the source file which path with "ipf" and also listed in
[Sources.IPF] section of INF file.
* Remove the source file which listed in [Components.IPF] section
of DSC file and not listed in any other [Components] section.
* Remove the embedded Ipf code for MDE_CPU_IPF.
Removing rules for Inf file:
* Remove IPF from VALID_ARCHITECTURES comments.
* Remove DXE_SAL_DRIVER from LIBRARY_CLASS in [Defines] section.
* Remove the INF which only listed in [Components.IPF] section in DSC.
* Remove statements from [BuildOptions] that provide IPF specific flags.
* Remove any IPF sepcific sections.
Removing rules for Dec file:
* Remove [Includes.IPF] section from Dec.
Removing rules for Dsc file:
* Remove IPF from SUPPORTED_ARCHITECTURES in [Defines] section of DSC.
* Remove any IPF specific sections.
* Remove statements from [BuildOptions] that provide IPF specific flags.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
1. Do not use tab characters
2. No trailing white space in one line
3. All files must end with CRLF
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
1. Module UNI and Package UNI files are not DOS format. Convert them to DOS format.
2. Remove unused SectionExtractionDxeModStrs.uni and SectionExtractionPeiModStrs.uni
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@16044 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
2. Add MODULE_UNI_FILE file that contains the localized Abstract and Description of a module.
a. Addresses an information gap between INF files and the UEFI Distribution Packaging Specification XML schema
b. There will be an associated update to UPT in BaseTools to consume MODULE_UNI_FILE and associated UNI file during UDP creation that performs the INF -> XML conversion.
c. There will be an associated update to UPT in BaseTools to produce MODULE_UNI_FILE and associated UNI file during UDP installation that performs the XML -> INF conversion.
3. Add Module Extra UNI file that provides the localized Name of a module.
a. [UserExtensions.TianoCore."ExtraFiles"] provides an easy method for a module to specify extra files not listed in [Sources] or [Binaries] sections to be added to a UDP without having to list the files in the UPT package information data file.
b. There will be an associated update to UPT in BaseTools to package up files listed in [UserExtensions.TianoCore."ExtraFiles"] during UDP creation.
c. UNI file contains localized name of a module to go along with the localized Abstract and Description from the MODULE_UNI_FILE.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@15963 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
1. Usage information in INF file comment blocks are either incomplete or incorrect.
This includes usage information for Protocols/PPIs/GUIDs/PCDs/HOBs/Events/BootModes.
The syntax for usage information in comment blocks is defined in the EDK II Module Information (INF) Specification
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@15962 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524