There are cases that the operands of an expression are all with rank less
than UINT64/INT64 and the result of the expression is explicitly cast to
UINT64/INT64 to fit the target size.
An example will be:
UINT32 a,b;
// a and b can be any unsigned int type with rank less than UINT64, like
// UINT8, UINT16, etc.
UINT64 c;
c = (UINT64) (a + b);
Some static code checkers may warn that the expression result might
overflow within the rank of "int" (integer promotions) and the result is
then cast to a bigger size.
The commit refines codes by the following rules:
1). When the expression is possible to overflow the range of unsigned int/
int:
c = (UINT64)a + b;
2). When the expression will not overflow within the rank of "int", remove
the explicit type casts:
c = a + b;
3). When the expression will be cast to pointer of possible greater size:
UINT32 a,b;
VOID *c;
c = (VOID *)(UINTN)(a + b); --> c = (VOID *)((UINTN)a + b);
4). When one side of a comparison expression contains only operands with
rank less than UINT32:
UINT8 a;
UINT16 b;
UINTN c;
if ((UINTN)(a + b) > c) {...} --> if (((UINT32)a + b) > c) {...}
For rule 4), if we remove the 'UINTN' type cast like:
if (a + b > c) {...}
The VS compiler will complain with warning C4018 (signed/unsigned
mismatch, level 3 warning) due to promoting 'a + b' to type 'int'.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
The OCS value should be initiliazed as 0x0F according to UFS spec.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
When UPIU packet is sent, (BIT0 << Slot) should be set according
to context. But BIT0 is used without Slot when UfsWaitMemSet ()
is invoked.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
According to UFS Host Controller Spec(JESD223), the bits 1:0 of this
DataByteCount field shall be 11b to indicate Dword granularity.
But the size of UFS Request Sense Data Response defined in UFS Spec
(JESD220C) is 18 which is not Dword aligned, we would have to round
down to the multiple of 4 to fill the DBC field to avoid bring issue
on some UFS HCs.
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
It includes 4 drivers:
1. UfsPassThruDxe, which is a UEFI driver and consumes EFI_UFS_HOST_CONTROLLER_PROTOCOL and produces EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_PROTOCOL
2. UfsPciHcDxe, which is specific for pci-based UFS HC implementation and is a UEFI driver to produce EFI_UFS_HOST_CONTROLLER_PROTOCOL.
3. UfsBlockIoPei, which is a PEI driver and consumes EFI_UFS_HOST_CONTROLLER_PPI and produces EFI_PEI_VIRTUAL_BLOCK_IO_PPI.
4. UfsPciHcPei, which is specific for pci-based UFS HC implementation and is a PEI driver to produce EFI_UFS_HOST_CONTROLLER_PPI.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17246 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Hao Wu
Haojian Zhuang
Feng Tian