REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3737
Apply uncrustify changes to .c/.h files in the MdeModulePkg package
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3767
Update use of DEBUG_CODE(Expression) if Expression is a complex code
block with if/while/for/case statements that use {}.
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3760
Update all use of ', OPTIONAL' to ' OPTIONAL,' for function params.
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3699
The code in MdeModulePkg\Library\DxeCapsuleLibFmp call the deprecated=20
interface VariableLockRequestToLock.c. So I changed the code in
FmpDevicePkg using RegisterBasicVariablePolicy, instead of the=20
deprecated interface.
Signed-off-by: Yang Jie <jie.yang@intel.com>
Cc: Guomin Jiang <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Enhance RelocateCapsuleToRam() to skip creation of the Capsule on Disk
file name capsule if PcdSupportUpdateCapsuleReset feature is not enabled.
This avoids an EFI_UNSUPPORTED return status from UpdateCapsule() when the
file name capsule is encountered and PcdSupportUpdateCapsuleReset is FALSE.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Guomin Jiang <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Morgan <bobm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Add bitmask to structure which gives a binary-inspectable mechanism to
determine if a capsule contains an authentication section or depex section.
(UEFI 2.8 errata a, mantis 2026)
Signed-off-by: Oleksiy Yakovlev <oleksiyy@ami.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
This follows UEFI Spec.
But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
for the callers in DxeCapsuleLibFmp which don't have the policy to defer
the execution of the image.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
The description of parameter CapFileName is missing in comments.
So add the description.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Add missing NULL pointer check for CapsuleNameBufStart.
Also add comments to notice that capsule name integrity check assumes
the capsule has been validated by IsValidCapsuleHeader().
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Chao B Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao B Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
REF: https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/
UEFI-Capsule-on-Disk-Introducation
CoDCheckCapsuleOnDiskFlag() is to check if CapsuleOnDisk flag in
"OsIndications" Variable is enabled. It is used to indicate whether
capsule on disk is provisioned in normal boot path.
CoDClearCapsuleOnDiskFlag() is to to clear CapsuleOnDisk flags,
including "OsIndications" and "BootNext" variable.
CoDRelocateCapsule() is to relocate the capsules from EFI system
partition. Depends on PcdCapsuleInRamSupport, there are two solutions
to relocate the capsule on disk images:
When Capsule In Ram is supported, the Capsule On Disk images are
relocated into memory, and call UpdateCapsule() service to deliver
the capsules.
When Capsule In Ram is not supported, the Capsule On Disk images are
relocated into a temp file which will be stored in root directory on
a platform specific storage device. CapsuleOnDiskLoadPei PEIM will
retrieve the capsules from the relocation temp file and report
capsule hobs for them.
CoDRemoveTempFile() is to remove the relocation temp file in the next
boot after capsules are processed.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Chao B Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao B Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/UEFI-Capsule-
on-Disk-Introducation
CoDCheckCapsuleOnDiskFlag() is to check if CapsuleOnDisk flag in
"OsIndications" Variable is enabled. It is used to indicate whether
capsule on disk is provisioned in normal boot path.
CoDClearCapsuleOnDiskFlag() is to to clear CapsuleOnDisk flags,
including "OsIndications" and "BootNext" variable.
CoDRelocateCapsule() is to relocate the capsules from EFI system
partition. Depends on PcdCapsuleInRamSupport, there are two solutions
to relocate the capsule on disk images:
When Capsule In Ram is supported, the Capsule On Disk images are
relocated into memory, and call UpdateCapsule() service to deliver
the capsules.
When Capsule In Ram is not supported, the Capsule On Disk images are
relocated into a temp file which will be stored in root directory on
a platform specific storage device. CapsuleOnDiskLoadPei PEIM will
retrieve the capsules from the relocation temp file and report
capsule hobs for them.
CoDRemoveTempFile() is to remove the relocation temp file in the next
boot after capsules are processed.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Chao B Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao B Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
The DxeCapsuleLibFmp code accesses the ESRT table to decide whether
a certain capsule is an FMP capsule. Since the UEFI spec mandates
that the ESRT resides in EfiBootServicesData memory, this results
in problems at OS runtime, since the firmware implementation itself
cannot access memory that has not been virtually remapped.
So let's take a private copy of the ESRT at ReadyToBoot, and store
it in EfiRuntimeServicesData memory. The ESRT's size is order 10s
of bytes so the memory footprint is going to be negligigble.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1088
Per UEFI spec, the fake capsule image with the header only is a valid case
in QueryCapsuleCpapbilities(). So, SupportCapsuleImage() is updated to
support this case.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
The PCDs below are unused, so they have been removed from inf.
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCapsuleMax
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdSystemRebootAfterCapsuleProcessFlag
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdStatusCodeSubClassCapsule
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCapsuleStatusCodeProcessCapsulesBegin
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCapsuleStatusCodeProcessCapsulesEnd
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCapsuleStatusCodeUpdatingFirmware
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCapsuleStatusCodeUpdateFirmwareSuccess
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCapsuleStatusCodeUpdateFirmwareFailed
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCapsuleStatusCodeResettingSystem
The library Pcdlib is not linked， so "#include <Library/PcdLib.h>"
is deleted.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Removing rules for Ipf sources file:
* Remove the source file which path with "ipf" and also listed in
[Sources.IPF] section of INF file.
* Remove the source file which listed in [Components.IPF] section
of DSC file and not listed in any other [Components] section.
* Remove the embedded Ipf code for MDE_CPU_IPF.
Removing rules for Inf file:
* Remove IPF from VALID_ARCHITECTURES comments.
* Remove DXE_SAL_DRIVER from LIBRARY_CLASS in [Defines] section.
* Remove the INF which only listed in [Components.IPF] section in DSC.
* Remove statements from [BuildOptions] that provide IPF specific flags.
* Remove any IPF sepcific sections.
Removing rules for Dec file:
* Remove [Includes.IPF] section from Dec.
Removing rules for Dsc file:
* Remove IPF from SUPPORTED_ARCHITECTURES in [Defines] section of DSC.
* Remove any IPF specific sections.
* Remove statements from [BuildOptions] that provide IPF specific flags.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Add NULL check to the return buffers from GetFmpHandleBufferByType().
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <Hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <Hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Current DxeCapsuleLibFmp always do reset for FMP capsule.
Actually, the code should use Attributes from FMP descriptor to know
whether reset is required or not.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
The code to check FmpImageSize again OFFSET_OF
(EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_IMAGE_HEADER, UpdateHardwareInstance)
can be refined to check against FmpImageHeaderSize.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ming Shao <ming.shao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
If the first call to UpdateImageProgress() fails, there is no point
in passing a pointer to it to Fmp->SetImage(), since it is highly
unlikely to succeed on any subsequent calls.
This permits the FMP implementation to fall back to an alternate means
of providing feedback to the user, e.g., via the console.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=801
Based on content from the following branch/commits:
https://github.com/Microsoft/MS_UEFI/tree/share/MsCapsuleSupport
* Change Update_Image_Progress() to UpdateImageProcess()
* Call DisplayUpdateProgressLib from UpdateImageProgress().
* Split out a boot service and runtime version of
UpdateImageProgress() so the DisplayUpdateProgressLib is
not used at runtime.
* If gEdkiiFirmwareManagementProgressProtocolGuid is present,
then use its progress bar color and watchdog timer value.
* If gEdkiiFirmwareManagementProgressProtocolGuid is not present,
then use default progress bar color and 5 min watchdog timer.
* Remove Print() calls during capsule processing. Instead,
the DisplayUpdateProgressLib is used to inform the user
of progress during a capsule update.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=873
Update IsNestedFmpCapsule() to verify the CapsuleGuid in
the CapsuleHeader against the installed Firmware Management
Protocol instances. The current logic that uses the ESRT
Table does not work because capsules are processed before
the ESRT Table is published at the Ready To Boot event.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=800
Based on content from the following branch/commits:
https://github.com/Microsoft/MS_UEFI/tree/share/MsCapsuleSupport33bab4031aca516b1a612b9f111f2e
Use BmpSupportLib to convert a BMP graphics image to a
GOP BLT buffer.
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
Move the definition of variable "mEsrtTable" and
"mIsVirtualAddrConverted" to DxeCapsuleLib.c.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: jiewen.yao@intel.com
The previous patch has problem on handling capsule
request at runtime.
This patch fixed the issue.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
There are cases that the operands of an expression are all with rank less
than UINT64/INT64 and the result of the expression is explicitly cast to
UINT64/INT64 to fit the target size.
An example will be:
UINT32 a,b;
// a and b can be any unsigned int type with rank less than UINT64, like
// UINT8, UINT16, etc.
UINT64 c;
c = (UINT64) (a + b);
Some static code checkers may warn that the expression result might
overflow within the rank of "int" (integer promotions) and the result is
then cast to a bigger size.
The commit refines codes by the following rules:
1). When the expression is possible to overflow the range of unsigned int/
int:
c = (UINT64)a + b;
2). When the expression will not overflow within the rank of "int", remove
the explicit type casts:
c = a + b;
3). When the expression will be cast to pointer of possible greater size:
UINT32 a,b;
VOID *c;
c = (VOID *)(UINTN)(a + b); --> c = (VOID *)((UINTN)a + b);
4). When one side of a comparison expression contains only operands with
rank less than UINT32:
UINT8 a;
UINT16 b;
UINTN c;
if ((UINTN)(a + b) > c) {...} --> if (((UINT32)a + b) > c) {...}
For rule 4), if we remove the 'UINTN' type cast like:
if (a + b > c) {...}
The VS compiler will complain with warning C4018 (signed/unsigned
mismatch, level 3 warning) due to promoting 'a + b' to type 'int'.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
For pointer subtraction, the result is of type "ptrdiff_t". According to
the C11 standard (Committee Draft - April 12, 2011):
"When two pointers are subtracted, both shall point to elements of the
same array object, or one past the last element of the array object; the
result is the difference of the subscripts of the two array elements. The
size of the result is implementation-defined, and its type (a signed
integer type) is ptrdiff_t defined in the <stddef.h> header. If the result
is not representable in an object of that type, the behavior is
undefined."
In our codes, there are cases that the pointer subtraction is not
performed by pointers to elements of the same array object. This might
lead to potential issues, since the behavior is undefined according to C11
standard.
Also, since the size of type "ptrdiff_t" is implementation-defined. Some
static code checkers may warn that the pointer subtraction might underflow
first and then being cast to a bigger size. For example:
UINT8 *Ptr1, *Ptr2;
UINTN PtrDiff;
...
PtrDiff = (UINTN) (Ptr1 - Ptr2);
The commit will refine the pointer subtraction expressions by casting each
pointer to UINTN first and then perform the subtraction:
PtrDiff = (UINTN) Ptr1 - (UINTN) Ptr2;
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
It is the follow up of commits 51f0ceb..9e32e97 to replace
AsciiValueToString/UnicodeValueToString with
AsciiValueToStringS/UnicodeValueToStringS.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Previous logic does not follow UEFI 22.2.3 to process FMP strictly.
It may cause FMP image not be processed in some corner case.
The updated logic follows UEFI 22.2.3.
The way to check if a capsule is processed is also simplified.
The function - ProcessFmpCapsuleImage() is too big, so that
we created sub-functions - StartFmpImage(), DumpAllFmpInfo(),
GetFmpHandleBufferByType(), SetFmpImageData(), RecordFmpCapsuleStatus()
to improve the readability.
The function - ProcessTheseCapsules() is too big, so that
we created sub-functions - InitCapsulePtr(), AreAllImagesProcessed(),
PopulateCapsuleInConfigurationTable() to improve the readability.
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
According to UEFI spec, capsule result variable may roll over to 0.
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
According to UEFI spec, capsule report variable should include
a null terminator for capsule name and capsule target, if they are
not present.
The reserved field is zeroed.
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
This instance handles Microsoft UX capsule, UEFI defined FMP capsule.
This instance should not assume any capsule image format.
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Michael Kubacki
Michael D Kinney
Yang Jie
Bob Morgan
Oleksiy Yakovlev
Dandan Bi
Xu, Wei6
Zhang, Shenglei
Zhang, Chao B
Ard Biesheuvel
Liming Gao
Chen A Chen
Star Zeng
Ruiyu Ni
Jiewen Yao
Hao Wu