Comments out a redundant call to RestoreTpl(). While this does not
technically violate spec on raise/restore TPL, TPL should already be at
the specified level. This extra call introduces an asymmetry between
RaiseTpl and RestoreTpl calls, which makes analysis of TPL correctness
more difficult and hampers certain non-standard TPL usages that some
platforms require. Additionally, the two TPL variables were renamed to
provide context for each of them.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Lautner <kenlautner3@gmail.com>
REF : https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4817
Before entering BIOS setup, CoreValidateHandle function executed
over 600,000 times during BDS phase on latest 8S server platform.
In CoreValidateHandle function, current implementation will go
through the doubly-linked list handle database in each call, and
this will have big impact on boot performance.
The optimization is using Red-black tree to store the EFI handle
address when insert each EFI handle into the handle database, and
remove the handle from Red-black tree if the handle is removed
from the handle database. CoreValidateHandle function changed to
go through the Red-black tree.
After verification on latest 8S server platform, BDS boot time can
save 20s+ after this change.
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Tested-by: Xiaoqiang Zhang <xiaoqiang.zhang@intel.com>
Currently whenever gDS->SetMemorySpaceCapabilities() is called, it
attempts to set the corresponding attributes in the gMemoryMap
descriptor. However, gMemoryMap only contains entries from GCD types
EfiGcdMemoryTypeSystemMemory and EfiGcdMemoryTypeMoreReliable, so
for all other types a failure is reported in the code. This is a
failure that is expected, so it does not provide value and can
lead to real failures being ignored.
This patch updates the gDS->SetMemorySpaceCapabilities() code to
only call into updating gMemoryMap if the GCD type is SystemMemory
or MoreReliable, to avoid spurious errors being reported. This
also avoids the expensive operation of searching through gMemoryMap
for entries we know we will fail to find.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
The Memory Attributes Table is generated by fetching the EFI memory map
and splitting entries which contain loaded images so DATA and CODE
sections have separate descriptors. The splitting is done via a call to
SplitTable() which
marks image DATA sections with the EFI_MEMORY_XP attribute and CODE
sections with the EFI_MEMORY_RO attribute when
splitting. After this process, there may still be EfiRuntimeServicesCode
regions which did not have their attributes set because they are not
part of loaded images.
This patch updates the MAT EnforceMemoryMapAttribute logic to set the
access attributes of runtime memory regions which are not part of loaded
images (have not had their access attributes set). The attributes of the
code regions will be read-only and no-execute because the UEFI spec
dictates that runtime code regions should only contain loaded EFI
modules.
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4832
Refs:
1.
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/topic/patch_v1_mdemodulepkg/105570114?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate/sticky,,,20,2,0,105570114
2.
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/topic/mdemodulepkg_fix_mat/105477564?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate/sticky,,,20,2,0,105477564
Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
Per UEFI spec 2.10 section 4.6.3 EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE,
"The Memory Attributes Table is currently used to describe memory
protections that may be applied to the EFI Runtime code and data
by an operating system or hypervisor. Consumers of this table must
currently ignore entries containing any values for Type except for
EfiRuntimeServicesData and EfiRuntimeServicesCode to ensure
compatibility with future uses of this table."
However, the current MAT code also enforces attributes for
EfiMemoryMappedIo and EfiMemoryMappedIoPortSpace, which it should
not be. Per
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/topic/patch_v1_mdemodulepkg/105570114?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate/sticky,,,20,2,0,105570114,
it was suggested to remove these types from the MAT logic.
This patch removes EfiMemoryMappedIo and EfiMemoryMappedIoPortSpace
from the MAT logic in accordance with the UEFI spec.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
Now that all of the EFI_MEMORY_* defines live in the
EFI_MEMORY_TYPE enum, remove the old defines.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2411
With Use-After-Free heap guard feature enabled, the DxeCore would blindly
attempt to "level-up" when the `GuardAllFreedPages` inspect a non-max
level table entry from the last loop. This could cause the next round of
inspection to dereference a potentially null pointer and as such causing
a page fault.
This change adds a null pointer check to prevent such case from happening.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Kun Qin <kun.qin@microsoft.com>
HBM/CXL memory systems are treated as special purpose memories. In many
cases it is desirable not to use special purpose memory for regular edk2
usages as these memories (HBm/CXL) are either meant for special purposes
or are less reliable to be used. Until such memory systems evolve and
we have better clarity from UEFI spec, avoid using them for edk2
boot memory purposes.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhaval Sharma <dhaval@rivosinc.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <tim@rivosinc.com>
Add a new entry into GCD attribute conversion table to convert
EFI_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_SPECIAL_PURPOSE to EFI_MEMORY_SP.
Signed-off-by: Du Lin <du.lin@intel.com>
EFI_RESOURCE_MEMORY_UNACCEPTED has been officially defined in the PI
1.8 specification. So all temporary solutions have been replaced with
the actual definition.
Cc: Felix Polyudov <felixp@ami.com>
Cc: Dhanaraj V <vdhanaraj@ami.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Sachin Ganesh <sachinganesh@ami.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
The functionality to create and delete Image Records has been
consolidated in a library and ensured that MemoryProtection.c's
usage is encapsulated there.
This patch moves MemoryProtection.c to reuse the code in the lib
and to prevent issues in the future where code is updated in one
place but not the other.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Taylor Beebe <taylor.d.beebe@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
Currently, there are multiple issues when page or pool guards are
allocated for runtime memory regions that are aligned to
non-EFI_PAGE_SIZE alignments. Multiple other issues have been fixed for
these same systems (notably ARM64 which has a 64k runtime page
allocation granularity) recently. The heap guard system is only built to
support 4k guard pages and 4k alignment.
Today, the address returned to a caller of AllocatePages will not be
aligned correctly to the runtime page allocation granularity, because
the heap guard system does not take non-4k alignment requirements into
consideration.
However, even with this bug fixed, the Memory Allocation Table cannot be
produced and an OS with a larger than 4k page granularity will not have
aligned memory regions because the guard pages are reported as part of
the same memory allocation. So what would have been, on an ARM64 system,
a 64k runtime memory allocation is actually a 72k memory allocation as
tracked by the Page.c code because the guard pages are tracked as part
of the same allocation. This is a core function of the current heap
guard architecture.
This could also be fixed with rearchitecting the heap guard system to
respect alignment requirements and shift the guard pages inside of the
outer rounded allocation or by having guard pages be the runtime
granularity. Both of these approaches have issues. In the former case,
we break UEFI spec 2.10 section 2.3.6 for AARCH64, which states that
each 64k page for runtime memory regions may not have mixed memory
attributes, which pushing the guard pages inside would create. In the
latter case, an immense amount of memory is wasted to support such large
guard pages, and with pool guard many systems could not support an
additional 128k allocation for all runtime memory.
The simpler and safer solution is to disallow page and pool guards for
runtime memory allocations for systems that have a runtime granularity
greater than the EFI_PAGE_SIZE (4k). The usefulness of such guards is
limited, as OSes do not map guard pages today, so there is only boot
time protection of these ranges. This also prevents other bugs from
being exposed by using guards for regions that have a non-4k alignment
requirement, as again, multiple have cropped up because the heap guard
system was not built to support it.
This patch adds both a static assert to ensure that either the runtime
granularity is the EFI_PAGE_SIZE or that the PCD bits are not set to
enable heap guard for runtime memory regions. It also adds a check in
the page and pool allocation system to ensure that at runtime we are not
allocating a runtime region and attempt to guard it (the PCDs are close
to being removed in favor of dynamic heap guard configurations).
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4674
Github PR: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/5382
Cc: Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>
Cc: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Per the UEFI spec 2.10, section 2.3.6 (for the AARCH64 arch, other
architectures in section two confirm the same) the memory types that
need runtime page allocation granularity are EfiReservedMemoryType,
EfiACPIMemoryNVS, EfiRuntimeServicesCode, and EfiRuntimeServicesData.
However, legacy code was setting runtime page allocation granularity for
EfiACPIReclaimMemory and not EfiReservedMemoryType. This patch fixes
that error.
Cc: Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>
Cc: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
CodeQL flags the Free Pages logic for not ensuring that
Entry is non-null before using it. Add a check for this
and appropriately bail out if we hit this case.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
CoreConnectSingleController() searches for the Driver Family Override
Protocol drivers by looping and checking each Driver Binding Handles.
This loop can be skipped by checking if any Driver Family Override
Protocol installed in the platform first, to improve the performance.
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhi Jin <zhi.jin@intel.com>
CoreGetProtocolInterface() is called by CoreOpenProtocol(),
CoreCloseProtocol() and CoreOpenProtocolInformation().
Before CoreOpenProtocol() calls CoreGetProtocolInterface(), the input
parameter UserHandle has been already checked for validation. So does
CoreCloseProtocol().
Removing the handle validation check in CoreGetProtocolInterface()
could improve the performance, as CoreOpenProtocol() is called very
frequently.
To ensure the assumption that the caller of CoreGetProtocolInterface()
must pass in a valid UserHandle that is checked with CoreValidateHandle(),
add the parameter check in CoreOpenProtocolInformation(), and declare
CoreGetProtocolInterface() as static.
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhi Jin <zhi.jin@intel.com>
Provide an optional method for PEI to declare a specific address
range to use for the Memory Type Information bins. The current
algorithm uses heuristics that tends to place the Memory Type
Information bins in the same location, but memory configuration
changes across boots or algorithm changes across a firmware
updates could potentially change the Memory Type Information bin
location. If the bin locations move across an S4 save/resume
cycle, then the S4 resume may fail. Enabling this feature
increases the number of scenarios that an S4 resume operation
may succeed.
If the HOB List contains a Resource Descriptor HOB that
describes tested system memory and has an Owner GUID of
gEfiMemoryTypeInformationGuid, then use the address range
described by the Resource Descriptor HOB as the preferred
location of the Memory Type Information bins. If this HOB is
not detected, then the current behavior is preserved.
The HOB with an Owner GUID of gEfiMemoryTypeInformationGuid
is ignored for the following conditions:
* The HOB with an Owner GUID of gEfiMemoryTypeInformationGuid
is smaller than the Memory Type Information bins.
* The HOB list contains more than one Resource Descriptor HOB
with an owner GUID of gEfiMemoryTypeInformationGuid.
* The Resource Descriptor HOB with an Owner GUID of
gEfiMemoryTypeInformationGuid is the same Resource Descriptor
HOB that that describes the PHIT memory range.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Aaron Li <aaron.li@intel.com>
Cc: Liu Yun <yun.y.liu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Update the DxeMain initialization order to initialize GCD
services before any runtime allocations are performed. This
is required to prevent runtime data fragmentation when the
UEFI System Table and UEFI Runtime Service Table are allocated
before both the memory and GCD services are initialized.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Aaron Li <aaron.li@intel.com>
Cc: Liu Yun <yun.y.liu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
CoreLocateDevicePath is used in CoreInstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces to
check if a Device Path Protocol instance with the same device path is
alreay installed.
CoreLocateDevicePath is a generic API, and would introduce some
unnecessary overhead for such usage.
The optimization is:
1. Implement IsDevicePathInstalled to loop all the Device Path
Protocols installed and check if any of them matchs the given device
path.
2. Replace CoreLocateDevicePath with IsDevicePathInstalled in
CoreInstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces.
This optimization could save several seconds in PCI enumeration on a
system with many PCI devices.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhi Jin <zhi.jin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Update DumpImageRecord() to be DumpImageRecords(), and improve
the debug output. The function will output at DEBUG_INFO instead,
and the function will be run in DXE and SMM
MAT logic when the MAT is installed at EndOfDxe on DEBUG builds.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Beebe <taylor.d.beebe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Add logic to create and delete image properties records. Where
applicable, redirect existing code to use the new library.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Beebe <taylor.d.beebe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
|4K PAGE|DATA|CODE|DATA|CODE|DATA|4K PAGE|
Say the above memory region is currently one memory map descriptor.
The above image memory layout example contains two code sections
oriented in a way that maximizes the number of descriptors which
would be required to describe each section.
NOTE: It's unlikely that a data section would ever be between
two code sections, but it's still handled by the below formula
for correctness.
There are two code sections (let's say CodeSegmentMax == 2),
three data sections, and two unrelated memory regions flanking the
image. The number of required descriptors to describe this layout
will be 2 * 2 + 3 == 7. This patch updates the calculations to account
for the worst-case scenario.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Beebe <taylor.d.beebe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Move some DXE MAT logic to ImagePropertiesRecordLib to consolidate
code and enable unit testability.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Beebe <taylor.d.beebe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
This patch updates MemoryAttributesTable.c to reduce reliance on global
variables and allow some logic to move to a library.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Beebe <taylor.d.beebe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Add PCD to control if modules with start addresses in PE/COFF > 0x100000
attempt to load at specified address.
If a module has an address in this range and there is untested memory
DxeCore will attempt to promote all memory to tested which bypasses any
memory testing that would occur later in boot.
There are several existing AARCH64 option roms that have base addresses
of 0x180000000.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashish Singhal <ashishsingha@nvidia.com>
Message-Id: <bd36c9c24158590db2226ede05cb8c2f50c93a37.1684194452.git.jbrasen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
When finding a free page range for allocation, if the found range
starts below the tracked memory bin address range, the lowest
memory bin address is updated which will not include the guard page if
present. When CoreConvertPagesWithGuard() is called on the range
being allocated, the memory range is adjusted to include guard
pages which can push it out of the memory bin address range and
cause the memory type statistics to be unaltered.
This patch updates the lowest memory bin address range to account for
the guard page if NeedGuard is TRUE so the memory type statistics
are updated correctly.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Beebe <t@taylorbeebe.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
FvbDev->LbaCache must be freed on error path before freeing FvbDev.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Mike Maslenkin <mike.maslenkin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
FwVolHeader must be freed on error path.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Mike Maslenkin <mike.maslenkin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4543
REF: https://uefi.org/specs/UEFI/2.10/07_Services_Boot_Services.html#efi-boot-services-locatehandlebuffer
CoreLocateHandleBuffer() can in certain cases, return an
error and not free an allocated buffer. This scenario
occurs if the first call to InternalCoreLocateHandle()
returns success and the second call returns an error.
On a successful return, LocateHandleBuffer() passes
ownership of the buffer to the caller. However, the UEFI
specification is not explicit about what the expected
ownership of this buffer is in the case of an error.
However, it is heavily implied by the code example given
in section 7.3.15 of v2.10 of the UEFI specificaton that
if LocateHandleBuffer() returns a non-successful status
code then the ownership of the buffer does NOT transfer
to the caller. This code example explicitly refrains from
calling FreePool() if LocateHandleBuffer() returns an
error.
From a practical standpoint, it is logical to assume that
a non-successful status code indicates that no buffer of
handles was ever allocated. Indeed, in most error cases,
LocateHandleBuffer() does not go far enough to get to the
point where a buffer is allocated. Therefore, all existing
users of this API must already be coded to support the case
of a non-successful status code resulting in an invalid
handle buffer being returned. Therefore, this change will
not cause any backwards compatibility issues with existing
code.
In conclusion, this boils down to a fix for a memory leak
that also brings the behavior of our LocateHandleBuffer()
implementation into alignment with the original intentions
of the UEFI specification authors.
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
Currently, HeapGuard, when in the GuardAlignedToTail mode, assumes that
the pool head has been allocated in the first page of memory that was
allocated. This is not the case for ARM64 platforms when allocating
runtime pools, as RUNTIME_PAGE_ALLOCATION_GRANULARITY is 64k, unlike
X64, which has RUNTIME_PAGE_ALLOCATION_GRANULARITY as 4k.
When a runtime pool is allocated on ARM64, the minimum number of pages
allocated is 16, to match the runtime granularity. When a small pool is
allocated and GuardAlignedToTail is true, HeapGuard instructs the pool
head to be placed as (MemoryAllocated + EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE(Number of Pages)
- SizeRequiredForPool).
This gives this scenario:
|Head Guard|Large Free Number of Pages|PoolHead|TailGuard|
When this pool goes to be freed, HeapGuard instructs the pool code to
free from (PoolHead & ~EFI_PAGE_MASK). However, this assumes that the
PoolHead is in the first page allocated, which as shown above is not true
in this case. For the 4k granularity case (i.e. where the correct number of
pages are allocated for this pool), this logic does work.
In this failing case, HeapGuard then instructs the pool code to free 16
(or more depending) pages from the page the pool head was allocated on,
which as seen above means we overrun the pool and attempt to free memory
far past the pool. We end up running into the tail guard and getting an
access flag fault.
This causes ArmVirtQemu to fail to boot with an access flag fault when
GuardAlignedToTail is set to true (and pool guard enabled for runtime
memory). It should also cause all ARM64 platforms to fail in this
configuration, for exactly the same reason, as this is core code making
the assumption.
This patch removes HeapGuard's assumption that the pool head is allocated
on the first page and instead undoes the same logic that HeapGuard did
when allocating the pool head in the first place.
With this patch in place, ArmVirtQemu boots with GuardAlignedToTail
set to true (and when it is false, also).
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4521
Github PR: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/4731
Cc: Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
__FUNCTION__ is a pre-standard extension that gcc and Visual C++ among
others support, while __func__ was standardized in C99.
Since it's more standard, replace __FUNCTION__ with __func__ throughout
MdeModulePkg.
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4405
The memory attributes table has been extended with a flag that indicates
whether or not the OS is permitted to map the EFI runtime code regions
with strict enforcement for IBT/BTI landing pad instructions.
Given that the PE/COFF spec now defines a DllCharacteristicsEx flag that
indicates whether or not a loaded image is compatible with this, we can
wire this up to the flag in the memory attributes table, and set it if
all loaded runtime image are compatible with it.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
UEFI v2.10 introduces a new flag to the memory attributes table to
inform the OS whether or not runtime services code regions were emitted
by the compiler with guard instructions for forward edge control flow
integrity enforcement.
So update our definition accordingly.
Link: https://uefi.org/specs/UEFI/2.10/04_EFI_System_Table.html#efi-memory-attributes-table
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Smith-Denny <osd@smith-denny.com>
This fixes messages like:
"Image type AARCH64 can't be loaded on <Unknown> UEFI system"
Cc: Daniel Schaefer <git@danielschaefer.me>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Warkentin <andrei.warkentin@intel.com>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4315
MemoryType of EfiUnacceptedMemoryType should not be allocated in
AllocatePool. Instead it should return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER.
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Reported-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Location of notification is has been specified in UEFI v2.9.
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Min M. Xu" <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: "Michael D. Kinney" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@google.com>
Message-Id: <20221108164616.3251967-4-dionnaglaze@google.com>
The page allocator code in CoreFindFreePagesI() uses a mask derived from
its UINTN Alignment argument to align the descriptor end address of a
MEMORY_MAP entry to the requested alignment, in order to check whether
the descriptor covers enough sufficiently aligned area to satisfy the
request.
However, on 32-bit architectures, 'Alignment' is a 32-bit type, whereas
DescEnd is a 64-bit type, and so the resulting operation performed on
the end address comes down to masking with 0xfffff000 instead of the
intended 0xffffffff_fffff000. Given the -1 at the end of the expression,
the resulting address is 0xffffffff_fffffffff for any descriptor that
ends on a 4G aligned boundary, and this is certainly not what was
intended.
So cast Alignment to UINT64 to ensure that the mask has the right size.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
RFC: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3937
Unaccepted memory is a kind of new memory type,
CoreInitializeGcdServices() and CoreGetMemoryMap() are updated to handle
the unaccepted memory type.
Ref: microsoft/mu_basecore@97e9c31
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Updates debug macros in the package that have an imbalanced number
of print specifiers to arguments. These changes try to preserve
what was likely intended by the author. In cases information was
missing due to the bug, the specifier may be removed since it was
not previously accurately printing the expected value.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Guomin Jiang <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Hide the Exception implementation details in CpuExcetionHandlerLib and
caller only need to provide buffer
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>
REF: https://https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Updated CoreInternalAllocatePages() to call PromoteMemoryResource() and
re-attempt the allocation if unable to convert the specified memory range
Signed-off-by: Stacy Howell <stacy.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Commit e7abb94d1 removed InitializeCpuExceptionHandlersEx
and updated DxeMain to call InitializeCpuExceptionHandlers
for exception setup. But the old behavior that calls *Ex() sets
up the stack guard as well. To match the old behavior,
the patch calls InitializeSeparateExceptionStacks.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Today InitializeCpuExceptionHandlersEx is called from three modules:
1. DxeCore (links to DxeCpuExceptionHandlerLib)
DxeCore expects it initializes the IDT entries as well as
assigning separate stacks for #DF and #PF.
2. CpuMpPei (links to PeiCpuExceptionHandlerLib)
and CpuDxe (links to DxeCpuExceptionHandlerLib)
It's called for each thread for only assigning separate stacks for
#DF and #PF. The IDT entries initialization is skipped because
caller sets InitData->X64.InitDefaultHandlers to FALSE.
Additionally, SecPeiCpuExceptionHandlerLib, SmmCpuExceptionHandlerLib
also implement such API and the behavior of the API is simply to initialize
IDT entries only.
Because it mixes the IDT entries initialization and separate stacks
assignment for certain exception handlers together, in order to know
whether the function call only initializes IDT entries, or assigns stacks,
we need to check:
1. value of InitData->X64.InitDefaultHandlers
2. library instance
This patch cleans up the code to separate the stack assignment to a new API:
InitializeSeparateExceptionStacks().
Only when caller calls the new API, the separate stacks are assigned.
With this change, the SecPei and Smm instance can return unsupported which
gives caller a very clear status.
The old API InitializeCpuExceptionHandlersEx() is removed in this patch.
Because no platform module is consuming the old API, the impact is none.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3737
Apply uncrustify changes to .c/.h files in the MdeModulePkg package
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3767
Update use of DEBUG_CODE(Expression) if Expression is a complex code
block with if/while/for/case statements that use {}.
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3760
Update all use of ', OPTIONAL' to ' OPTIONAL,' for function params.
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3739
Update all use of EFI_D_* defines in DEBUG() macros to DEBUG_* defines.
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3680
This patch fixes the following issue:
The global variable gHandleList is a linked list.
This list is locked when a entry is added or removed from the list,
but there is no lock when iterating this list in function
CoreValidateHandle().
It can lead to "Handle.c (76): CR has Bad Signature" assertion if the
iterated entry in the list is just removed by other task during iterating.
Currently some caller functions of CoreValidateHandle() have
CoreAcquireProtocolLock(), but some caller functions of
CoreValidateHandle() do not CoreAcquireProtocolLock().
Add CoreAcquireProtocolLock() always when CoreValidateHandle() is called,
Also, A lock check is added in the CoreValidateHandle().
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hua Ma <hua.ma@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Ken Lautner
Xiaoqiang Zhang
Oliver Smith-Denny
Dmitry Antipov
Kun Qin
Dhaval
Du Lin
Sachin Ganesh
Zhi Jin
Dongyan Qian
Michael D Kinney
Taylor Beebe
Jeff Brasen
Taylor Beebe
Mike Maslenkin
Nate DeSimone
Rebecca Cran
Ard Biesheuvel
Michael Kubacki
Andrei Warkentin
Min M Xu
Dionna Glaze
Liu, Zhiguang
Stacy Howell
Ray Ni
Hua Ma