Struct packing is only necessary for data structures whose in-memory
representation is covered by the PI or UEFI specs, and may deviate
from the ordinary C rules for alignment.
So in case of FileExplorerLib, this applies to the device path struct
only, and other structures used to carry program data should not be
packed, or we may end up with alignment faults on architectures such
as ARM, which don't permit load/store double or multiple instructions
to access memory locations that are not 32-bit aligned.
E.g., the following call in FileExplorerLibConstructor()
InitializeListHead (&gFileExplorerPrivate.FsOptionMenu->Head);
which is emitted as follows for 32-bit ARM/Thumb2 by Clang-5.0
3de0: b510 push {r4, lr}
3de2: 4604 mov r4, r0
...
3de8: e9c4 4400 strd r4, r4, [r4]
3dec: bd10 pop {r4, pc}
will perform a double-word store on the first argument, passed in
register r0, assuming that the pointer type of the argument is
enough to guarantee that the value is suitably aligned.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Removing rules for Ipf sources file:
* Remove the source file which path with "ipf" and also listed in
[Sources.IPF] section of INF file.
* Remove the source file which listed in [Components.IPF] section
of DSC file and not listed in any other [Components] section.
* Remove the embedded Ipf code for MDE_CPU_IPF.
Removing rules for Inf file:
* Remove IPF from VALID_ARCHITECTURES comments.
* Remove DXE_SAL_DRIVER from LIBRARY_CLASS in [Defines] section.
* Remove the INF which only listed in [Components.IPF] section in DSC.
* Remove statements from [BuildOptions] that provide IPF specific flags.
* Remove any IPF sepcific sections.
Removing rules for Dec file:
* Remove [Includes.IPF] section from Dec.
Removing rules for Dsc file:
* Remove IPF from SUPPORTED_ARCHITECTURES in [Defines] section of DSC.
* Remove any IPF specific sections.
* Remove statements from [BuildOptions] that provide IPF specific flags.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
1. Do not use tab characters
2. No trailing white space in one line
3. All files must end with CRLF
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
For pointer subtraction, the result is of type "ptrdiff_t". According to
the C11 standard (Committee Draft - April 12, 2011):
"When two pointers are subtracted, both shall point to elements of the
same array object, or one past the last element of the array object; the
result is the difference of the subscripts of the two array elements. The
size of the result is implementation-defined, and its type (a signed
integer type) is ptrdiff_t defined in the <stddef.h> header. If the result
is not representable in an object of that type, the behavior is
undefined."
In our codes, there are cases that the pointer subtraction is not
performed by pointers to elements of the same array object. This might
lead to potential issues, since the behavior is undefined according to C11
standard.
Also, since the size of type "ptrdiff_t" is implementation-defined. Some
static code checkers may warn that the pointer subtraction might underflow
first and then being cast to a bigger size. For example:
UINT8 *Ptr1, *Ptr2;
UINTN PtrDiff;
...
PtrDiff = (UINTN) (Ptr1 - Ptr2);
The commit will refine the pointer subtraction expressions by casting each
pointer to UINTN first and then perform the subtraction:
PtrDiff = (UINTN) Ptr1 - (UINTN) Ptr2;
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=324
Enhance the FileExplorerlib so that user can create a new file/folder
through the UI page.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342
When user select and enter a directory, File Explorer will update the
form based on the new folders and files in the directory. But when
creating question opcodes, the question id is same with previous one
and this will cause browser to show the highlight menu incorrectly.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323
FileExplorer no need to search load file protocol to show files.
Now remove the codes.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
In function 'LibAppendFileName' of 'FileExplorer.c':
"
MaxLen = (Size1 + Size2 + sizeof (CHAR16))/ sizeof (CHAR16);
"
Overflow may happen here. MaxLen might become a very small number.
This patch adds integer overflow checker.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
when there's no volume label 'Info' can be NULL
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Michael Zimmermann <sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Currently the EFI_FILE_EXPLORE_FORMSET_GUID value in BdsDxe in
IntelFrameworkModulePkg is same with the GUID VALUE in FileExplorerLib.
This patch is to modify the EFI_FILE_EXPLORE_FORMSET_GUID in
FileExplorerLib to avoid potential issue.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
when free up resource allocated for a MenuEntry, there exists
the case that the DevicePath and DisplayString are NULL,
so before calling FreePool function, need to check.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
The caller has initial the input parameter before call this function, So this code is useless.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@19302 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Add comments in INF file in BootMaintenanceManagerLib.inf.
Refine the comments in INF file in FileExplorerLib.inf
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18975 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
This library support select one file from the specified directory or from system root directory.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <elhaj@hpe.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18917 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Ard Biesheuvel
Chen A Chen
Liming Gao
Hao Wu
Dandan Bi
Michael Zimmermann
Dong, Eric
Jordan Justen