((Facs->Flags & EFI_ACPI_4_0_OSPM_64BIT_WAKE__F) != 0))
In above code, Facs->OspmFlags should be used instead.
EFI_ACPI_4_0_OSPM_64BIT_WAKE__F is a bit in OSPM Enabled Firmware
Control Structure Flags field, not in Firmware Control Structure
Feature Flags.
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1430
Cc: Aleksiy <oleksiyy@ami.com>
Cc: Jian Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
The PCD below is unused, so it has been removed from inf.
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdExtFpdtBootRecordPadSize
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=967
Request to add a library function for GetAcpiTable() in order
to get ACPI table using signature as input.
After evaluation, we found there are many duplicated code to
find ACPI table by signature in different modules.
This patch updates S3SaveStateDxe to use new
EfiLocateFirstAcpiTable() and remove the duplicated code.
Cc: Younas khan <pmdyounaskhan786@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Removing rules for Ipf sources file:
* Remove the source file which path with "ipf" and also listed in
[Sources.IPF] section of INF file.
* Remove the source file which listed in [Components.IPF] section
of DSC file and not listed in any other [Components] section.
* Remove the embedded Ipf code for MDE_CPU_IPF.
Removing rules for Inf file:
* Remove IPF from VALID_ARCHITECTURES comments.
* Remove DXE_SAL_DRIVER from LIBRARY_CLASS in [Defines] section.
* Remove the INF which only listed in [Components.IPF] section in DSC.
* Remove statements from [BuildOptions] that provide IPF specific flags.
* Remove any IPF sepcific sections.
Removing rules for Dec file:
* Remove [Includes.IPF] section from Dec.
Removing rules for Dsc file:
* Remove IPF from SUPPORTED_ARCHITECTURES in [Defines] section of DSC.
* Remove any IPF specific sections.
* Remove statements from [BuildOptions] that provide IPF specific flags.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
1. Do not use tab characters
2. No trailing white space in one line
3. All files must end with CRLF
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
NASM has replaced ASM and S files.
1. Remove ASM from all modules.
2. Remove S files from the drivers only.
3. https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=881
After NASM is updated, S files can be removed from Library.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Replace the call to and implementation of the function
FpdtAllocateReservedMemoryBelow4G() with a call to
AllocatePeiAccessiblePages, which boils down to the same on X64,
but does not crash non-X64 systems that lack memory below 4 GB.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
AcpiPlatformDxe solely performs one-time tasks and does not expose
any services or create any events. Hence it can safely be unloaded
after the Entry Point execution by returning an error code.
V2: Return EFI_REQUEST_UNLOAD_IMAGE.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Marvin Haeuser <Marvin.Haeuser@outlook.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
We have updated performance infrastructure in previous commits:
between
73fef64f14
and
115eae650b
Update FPDT drivers to collect the performance data reported by
gEdkiiFpdtExtendedFirmwarePerformanceGuid.
The old implementation which collected performance data through
gEfiFirmwarePerformanceGuid is not supported now.
We should add error message to remind user for this unsupported
case in case anyone use it by mistake.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=799
Based on content from the following branch/commit:
https://github.com/Microsoft/MS_UEFI/tree/share/MsCapsuleSupport33bab4031a
Update BootGraphicsResourceDxe to produce both the Boot Logo
Protocol and the Boot Logo 2 Protocol.
The Boot Logo 2 Protocol service GetBootLogo() is amended
to return the pointer to the GOP BLT buffer previously
registered with the SetBootLogo() service.
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Cc: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=800
Based on content from the following branch/commits:
https://github.com/Microsoft/MS_UEFI/tree/share/MsCapsuleSupport33bab4031aca516b1a612b9f111f2e
Use BmpSupportLib to convert a GOP BLT Buffer to the BMP graphics
image that is published in an ACPI BGRT table.
* Remove use of IndustryStandard/Bmp.h include file
* Remove mBmpImageHeaderTemplate. This is handled by BmpSupportLib
* Clean up code style with function prototypes at top
and all module global variables together
* Update SetBootLogo() to use SafeIntLib to check input parameters
for overflows.
* Remove internal function BgrtAcpiTableChecksum(). Use
CalculateCheckSum8() directly from BgrtReadyToBootEventNotify()
* Remove InstallBootGraphicsResourceTable(). Move all the code into
BgrtReadyToBootEventNotify() that is signaled at ready to boot.
* Remove all logic that converts a GOP BLT buffer to a BMP graphics image
and use BmpSupportLib function TranslateGopBltToBmp() instead.
* Use AllocatePool() instead of AllocatePages() to allocate copy of
BMP image that is provided by BGRT. This is required to be compatible
with BmpSupportLib function TranslateGopBltToBmp() that uses
AllocatePool().
* Zero OemId in BGRT header before filling in value from PCD.
* Get size of PcdAcpiDefaultOemId and only copy the the size of the PCD
if it is smaller than the size of the OemId field in the BGRT header.
* Use WriteUnaligned24() instead of CopyMem() for the OemTableId field
of the BGRT header.
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
V3:
a. Remove unused definitions
b. Get records size form the records buffer when getting size action
is triggered.
V2:
Update FirmwarePerformanceSmm to receive the address
of performance records instead of records content.
Receive buffer address of Boot performance records
which are reported by SmmCorePerformanceLib.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
V4:
Update the GUID for status code in DxeCorePerformanceLib and
FirmwarePerformanceDxe.
V3:Add handling for the case when performance feature is not enabled.
V2:
Update FirmwarePerformanceDxe to receive the address
of performance records instead of records content.
1. Remove the macro EXTENSION_RECORD_SIZE, since the extension
size can be got through PcdExtFpdtBootRecordPadSize.
2. Hook EFI_SW_DXE_BS_PC_READY_TO_BOOT_EVENT to install ACPI table
3. Copy SMM record accord to the allocated size
4. Receive Boot performance table address instead of
contents which are reported DxeCorePerformanceLib.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
If PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy is set to enable protection for memory
of EfiReservedMemoryType, the BIOS will hang at a page fault exception
triggered by BootScriptExecutorDxe.
The root cause is that this driver will allocate memory of
EfiReservedMemoryType and relocate itself into this new memory. Since
EfiReservedMemoryType of memory is marked non-executable, re-start this
driver after relocation will cause exception. The fix is removing the NX
attribute after memory allocation.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
EFI_BOOT_SCRIPT_WRITE() interface is a var-arg interface.
Spec defines the order of parameters for
EFI_BOOT_SCRIPT_PCI_CONFIG2_WRITE_OPCODE as below:
typedef
EFI_STATUS
(EFIAPI *EFI_BOOT_SCRIPT_WRITE) (
IN CONST EFI_S3_SAVE_STATE_PROTOCOL *This,
IN UINT16 OpCode,
IN EFI_BOOT_SCRIPT_WIDTH Width,
IN UINT16 Segment,
IN UINT64 Address,
IN UINTN Count,
IN VOID *Buffer
);
But implementation assumes Segment is in the very end, after Buffer.
Similar spec/implementation gaps are also found for
EFI_BOOT_SCRIPT_PCI_CONFIG2_READ_WRITE_OPCODE.
The patch fixes the implementation to extract the arguments in
correct order.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Current SEC performance data getting code in FirmwarePerformancePei
may get wrong SEC performance data if FirmwarePerformancePei executes
after memory discovered.
And as SecCore has added SecPerformancePpiCallBack to get SEC performance
data and build HOB to convey the SEC performance data to DXE phase.
This patch is to remove the SEC performance data getting code in
FirmwarePerformancePei.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The BGRT table has an 8 byte field for the memory address of the image
data, and yet the driver explicitly allocates below 4 GB. This results
in an ASSERT() on systems that do not have any memory below 4 GB to begin
with.
Since neither the PI, the UEFI or the ACPI spec contain any mention of
why this data should reside below 4 GB, replace the allocation call
with an ordinary AllocatePages() call.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Invocations of EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL::UninstallAcpiTable() may
result in a crash when the value of PcdAcpiExposedTableVersions does
not include EFI_ACPI_TABLE_VERSION_1_0B.
The reason is that EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL::InstallAcpiTable() will
only populate the Rsdt1/Rsdt3 pointers when EFI_ACPI_TABLE_VERSION_1_0B
is set, whereas EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL::UninstallAcpiTable() will
invoke PublishTables with EFI_ACPI_TABLE_VERSION_1_0B alawys set,
resulting in a NULL pointer dereference of the Rsdt1/Rsdt3 pointers.
So take PcdAcpiExposedTableVersions into account for UninstallAcpiTable
as well.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
198a46d768 improved the DSDT and X_DSDT
fields mutual exclusion by checking FADT revision, but that breaks
some OS that has assumption to only consume X_DSDT field even the
DSDT address is < 4G.
To have better compatibility, this patch is to update the code to not
make FADT.{DSDT,X_DSDT} mutual exclusion, but always set both DSDT and
X_DSDT fields in the FADT when the DSDT address is < 4G.
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
The ACPI specification, up to and including revision 5.1 Errata A, allows
the DSDT and X_DSDT fields to be both set in the FADT. (Obviously, this
only makes sense if the DSDT address is representable in 4 bytes.)
Starting with 5.1 Errata B, specifically for Mantis 1393
<https://mantis.uefi.org/mantis/view.php?id=1393>, the spec requires at
most one of DSDT and X_DSDT to be set to a nonzero value.
MdeModulePkg/AcpiTableDxe handles this mutual exclusion somewhat
inconsistently.
- If the caller of EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL.InstallAcpiTable() installs the
tables in "DSDT, FADT" order, then we enforce the exclusion between the
DSDT and X_DSDT fields:
DSDT under 4GB FADT.DSDT FADT.X_DSDT [VARIANT B]
-------------- --------- -----------
yes set clear
no clear set
This behavior conforms to 5.1 Errata B. (And it's not required by
earlier versions of the spec.)
- If the caller passes in the tables in "FADT, DSDT" relative order, then
we do not enforce the exclusion:
DSDT under 4GB FADT.DSDT FADT.X_DSDT [VARIANT A]
-------------- --------- -----------
yes set set
no clear set
This satisfies 5.1 Errata A and earlier, but breaks 5.1 Errata B and
later.
Unify the handling of both relative orders. In particular, check the major
and minor version numbers in the FADT. If the FADT version is strictly
before 5.1, then implement [VARIANT A]. If the FADT version is equal to or
larger than 5.1, then implement [VARIANT B].
We make three observations:
- We can't check the FADT table version precisely against "5.1 Errata B";
erratum levels are not captured in the table. We err in the safe
direction, namely we enforce the exclusion for "5.1" and "5.1 Errata A".
- The same applies to "6.0" versus "6.0 Errata A". Because we cannot
distinguish these two, we consider "6.0" to be "equal to or larger than
5.1", and apply [VARIANT B], enforcing the exclusion.
- While a blanket [VARIANT B] would be simpler, there is a significant
benefit to [VARIANT A], under the spec versions that permit it:
compatibility with a wider range of OSPMs (typically, older ones).
For example, Igor reported about a "DELL R430 system with rev4 FADT
where DSDT and X_DSDT are pointing to the same address". Michael also
reported about several systems that exhibit the same.
Regression tested with the following KVM guests (QEMU built at
ata0def594286d, "Merge remote-tracking branch
'remotes/bonzini/tags/for-upstream' into staging", 2017-01-30):
- OVMF: boot and S3 suspend/resume
- Ia32, Q35, SMM
- Fedlet 20141209
- Ia32X64, Q35, SMM
- Fedora 22
- Windows 7
- Windows 8.1
- Windows 10
- Windows Server 2008 R2
- Windows Server 2012 R2
- Windows Server 2016 Tech Preview 4
- X64, I440FX, no SMM
- Fedora 24
- RHEL-6.7
- RHEL-7.2-ish
- ArmVirtQemu: boot test with virtio-gpu
- AARCH64
- Fedora 24
- RHELSA-7.3
- openSUSE Tumbleweed (4.8.4-based)
This change is connected to ASWG ticket
<https://mantis.uefi.org/mantis/view.php?id=1757>, which is now
closed/fixed.
Cc: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Leo Duran <leo.duran@amd.com>
Cc: Michael Tsirkin <mtsirkin@redhat.com>
Cc: Phil Dennis-Jordan <phil@philjordan.eu>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reported-by: Phil Dennis-Jordan <phil@philjordan.eu>
Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Phil Dennis-Jordan <phil@philjordan.eu>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
This patch incurs no functional changes, it just removes some whitespace,
and also makes sure we always assign
AcpiTableInstance->Fadt3->Dsdt
first, and
AcpiTableInstance->Fadt3->XDsdt
second. The goal is to separate the syntactic changes from the functional
changes implemented by the next patch.
Cc: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Leo Duran <leo.duran@amd.com>
Cc: Michael Tsirkin <mtsirkin@redhat.com>
Cc: Phil Dennis-Jordan <phil@philjordan.eu>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
There are cases that the operands of an expression are all with rank less
than UINT64/INT64 and the result of the expression is explicitly cast to
UINT64/INT64 to fit the target size.
An example will be:
UINT32 a,b;
// a and b can be any unsigned int type with rank less than UINT64, like
// UINT8, UINT16, etc.
UINT64 c;
c = (UINT64) (a + b);
Some static code checkers may warn that the expression result might
overflow within the rank of "int" (integer promotions) and the result is
then cast to a bigger size.
The commit refines codes by the following rules:
1). When the expression is possible to overflow the range of unsigned int/
int:
c = (UINT64)a + b;
2). When the expression will not overflow within the rank of "int", remove
the explicit type casts:
c = a + b;
3). When the expression will be cast to pointer of possible greater size:
UINT32 a,b;
VOID *c;
c = (VOID *)(UINTN)(a + b); --> c = (VOID *)((UINTN)a + b);
4). When one side of a comparison expression contains only operands with
rank less than UINT32:
UINT8 a;
UINT16 b;
UINTN c;
if ((UINTN)(a + b) > c) {...} --> if (((UINT32)a + b) > c) {...}
For rule 4), if we remove the 'UINTN' type cast like:
if (a + b > c) {...}
The VS compiler will complain with warning C4018 (signed/unsigned
mismatch, level 3 warning) due to promoting 'a + b' to type 'int'.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
This PCD holds the address mask for page table entries when memory
encryption is enabled on AMD processors supporting the Secure Encrypted
Virtualization (SEV) feature.
This module updates the under-4GB page tables configured by the S3-Resume
code in UefiCpuPkg/Universal/Acpi/S3Resume2Pei. The mask is saved at module
start (ScriptExecute.c), and applied when tables are expanded on-demand by
page-faults above 4GB's (SetIdtEntry.c).
CC: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Leo Duran <leo.duran@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
The BootScriptWriteMemPoll() helper function in both drivers does the
following:
- pop Delay from the variable argument list as UINT64, then truncate it to
UINTN,
- divide Delay by 10, using DivU64x32Remainder(), then store the quotient
in LoopTimes (also UINTN),
- pass LoopTimes to S3BootScriptSaveMemPoll() as last argument.
The truncation to UINTN is superfluous and wrong in this logic (not to
mention incompatible with the PI spec); it prevents callers from
specifying Delays longer than 0xFFFF_FFFF * 100ns (approximately 429
seconds == 7 minutes 9 seconds) on Ia32. In particular it prevents callers
from specifying an infinite timeout (for example, 0xFFFF_FFFF_FFFF_FFFF *
100ns, approximately 58494 years).
Change the type of Delay and LoopTimes to UINT64. Keep the same logic,
just remove the truncations. The resultant LoopTimes values can be safely
passed to S3BootScriptSaveMemPoll() thanks to the previous patch.
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Use real nasm instruction to replace DB bytes.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The BaseTools/Scripts/ConvertMasmToNasm.py script was used to convert
X64/S3Asm.asm to X64/S3Asm.nasm
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Use real nasm instruction to replace DB bytes.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The BaseTools/Scripts/ConvertMasmToNasm.py script was used to convert
IA32/S3Asm.asm to IA32/S3Asm.nasm
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
NASM doesn't support EXTERNDEF, so convert this to PUBLIC.
This will make it easier to convert this code to NASM using an
automated script.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Without this change, after converting this code to NASM, this error
will be reported:
error: invalid combination of opcode and operands
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
This patch enhance performance data SMM communication by using fixed
SMM communication buffer.
Update FpdtDxe to use fixed SMM communication buffer to get
performance data by SMM_FPDT_FUNCTION_GET_BOOT_RECORD_DATA_BY_OFFSET API.
This is designed to meet Microsoft WSMT table definition on FIXED_COMM_BUFFERS
requirement.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
This patch enhance performance data SMM communication by using fixed
SMM communication buffer.
Update FpdtSmm to handle SMM_FPDT_FUNCTION_GET_BOOT_RECORD_DATA_BY_OFFSET
request.
This is designed to meet Microsoft WSMT table definition on FIXED_COMM_BUFFERS
requirement.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
The S3Ready() functional code in AcpiS3SaveDxe of IntelFrameworkModulePkg
is to do ACPI S3 Context save. In fact, that is not really related to
Intel framework ACPI S3 protocol.
IntelFrameworkModulePkg will be deprecated step by step, so move the
functional code to MdeModulePkg and S3SaveStateDxe is a good place.
The ACPI global variable related code is leaved as is in IntelFrameworkModulePkg
AcpiS3SaveDxe for compatibility.
PcdS3BootScriptStackSize is also moved from IntelFrameworkModulePkg.
The functional code need to get ACPI FACS table and consume LockBoxLib,
so need to be before DxeSmmReadyToLock that will shut down SMM lock box
interface, EndOfDxe is a good point (OVMF AcpiS3SaveDxe has the reference
implementation).
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Some static scan tool may regard CurrentRsdtEntry to be potentially
referenced to NULL pointer if CurrentRsdtEntry == NULL is used in
the right above if condition judgment.
CopyMem (CurrentRsdtEntry, CurrentRsdtEntry + 1, (*NumberOfTableEntries - Index) * sizeof (UINT32));
It is introduced by commit f9bbb8d9c3.
To avoid it and have same style with
"((Xsdt == NULL) || CurrentTablePointer64 == (UINT64) (UINTN) Table->Table)",
use Rsdt instead of CurrentRsdtEntry to check against NULL.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Shumin Qiu <shumin.qiu@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shumin Qiu <shumin.qiu@intel.com>
1. The consumer of Acpi Sdt Protocol may want to use the API after ReadyToLock.
2. The ACPI system configuration table even could be overwritten,
we see little issue in leaving Acpi Sdt Protocol installed.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
The assignment of CurrentRsdtEntry and its subsequent dereference are
subject to the same condition, but for some reason, VS2008 does not see
that and warns about the dereference possibly involving an uninitialized
pointer. Since the single statememt between the blocks is unrelated, we
can just move it and merge the two conditional blocks together.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
AARCH64 systems never require compatibility with legacy ACPI OSes, and
may not have any 32-bit addressable system RAM. To support ACPI on these
systems, we need to be able to relax the 4 GB allocation restriction.
So add a PCD PcdAcpiExposedTableVersions containing a bitmask describing
which ACPI versions are targeted, and wire it up it up to the memory
allocation calls in AcpiTableDxe/AcpiTableProtocol.c. I.e., if ACPI v1.0b
is not among the supported versions, the memory allocations are not limited
to 4 GB, and only table types that carry 64-bit addresses are emitted.
Note that this will inhibit the publishing of any tables that carry only
32-bit addresses, i.e., RSDPv1, RSDTv1 and RSDTv3.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Michael D Kinney
Shenglei Zhang
Eric Dong
Star Zeng
Chen A Chen
Liming Gao
Ard Biesheuvel
Marvin.Haeuser@outlook.com
Dandan Bi
Jian J Wang
Ruiyu Ni
Jeff Fan
Laszlo Ersek
Hao Wu
Leo Duran
Gary Lin
Jordan Justen