REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3739
Update all use of EFI_D_* defines in DEBUG() macros to DEBUG_* defines.
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3680
This patch fixes the following issue:
The global variable gHandleList is a linked list.
This list is locked when a entry is added or removed from the list,
but there is no lock when iterating this list in function
CoreValidateHandle().
It can lead to "Handle.c (76): CR has Bad Signature" assertion if the
iterated entry in the list is just removed by other task during iterating.
Currently some caller functions of CoreValidateHandle() have
CoreAcquireProtocolLock(), but some caller functions of
CoreValidateHandle() do not CoreAcquireProtocolLock().
Add CoreAcquireProtocolLock() always when CoreValidateHandle() is called,
Also, A lock check is added in the CoreValidateHandle().
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hua Ma <hua.ma@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3666
Currently, CoreLocateHandleBuffer() follows three steps:
1) get the size of protocol database firstly
2) allocate the buffer based on the size
3) get the protocol database into the buffer
There is no lock protection for the whole three steps. If a new protocol
added in step 2) by other task, e.g. (event timer handle USB device
hotplug). The size of protocol database may be increased and cannot fit
into the previous buffer in step 3). The protocol database cannot be
returned successfully, EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL error will be returned.
This patch adds the lock to protect the whole three steps.
It can make sure the correct protocol database be returned.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hua Ma <hua.ma@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi dandan.bi@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn
Fix various typos throughout MdeModulePkg.
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@nuviainc.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
The DXE Core sets up a protocol notify function in its entry point, for
instances of the Firmware Volume Block2 Protocol:
DxeMain() [DxeMain/DxeMain.c]
FwVolDriverInit() [FwVol/FwVol.c]
Assume that a 3rd party UEFI driver or application installs an FVB
instance, with crafted contents. The notification function runs:
NotifyFwVolBlock() [FwVol/FwVol.c]
installing an instance of the Firmware Volume 2 Protocol on the handle.
(Alternatively, assume that a 3rd party application calls
gDS->ProcessFirmwareVolume(), which may also produce a Firmware Volume 2
Protocol instance.)
The EFI_FIRMWARE_VOLUME2_PROTOCOL.ReadSection() member performs "a
depth-first, left-to-right search algorithm through all sections found in
the specified file" (quoting the PI spec), as follows:
FvReadFileSection() [FwVol/FwVolRead.c]
GetSection() [SectionExtraction/CoreSectionExtraction.c]
FindChildNode() [SectionExtraction/CoreSectionExtraction.c]
FindChildNode() // recursive call
FindChildNode() is called recursively for encapsulation sections.
Currently this recursion is not limited. Introduce a new PCD
(fixed-at-build, or patchable-in-module), and make FindChildNode() track
the section nesting depth against that PCD.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1743
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201119105340.16225-3-lersek@redhat.com>
FindChildNode() has two callers: GetSection(), and FindChildNode() itself.
- At the GetSection() call site, a positive (i.e., nonzero)
SectionInstance is passed. This is because GetSection() takes a
zero-based (UINTN) SectionInstance, and then passes
Instance=(SectionInstance+1) to FindChildNode().
- For reaching the recursive FindChildNode() call site, a section type
mismatch, or a section instance mismatch, is necessary. This means,
respectively, that SectionInstance will either not have been decreased,
or not to zero anyway, at the recursive FindChildNode() call site.
Add two ASSERT()s to FindChildNode(), for expressing the (SectionSize>0)
invariant.
In turn, the invariant provides the explanation why, after the recursive
call, a zero SectionInstance implies success. Capture it in a comment.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201119105340.16225-2-lersek@redhat.com>
CoreInitializeMemoryServices() logs "BaseAddress" and "Length" with
DEBUG() before DxeMain() calls ProcessLibraryConstructorList()
explicitly. (Library construction is not an automatic part of the DXE
Core entry point.)
So those DEBUG()s in CoreInitializeMemoryServices() are issued against
an un-constructed DebugLib, and also against a -- possibly underlying --
un-constructed SerialPortLib.
Some DebugLib instances can deal with this (see for example commit
91a5b13650, "OvmfPkg/PlatformDebugLibIoPort: fix port detection for
use in the DXE Core", 2018-08-06), while some others can't (see for
example the DebugLib instance
"MdePkg/Library/BaseDebugLibSerialPort/BaseDebugLibSerialPort.inf"
coupled with the SerialPortLib instance
"ArmVirtPkg/Library/FdtPL011SerialPortLib/FdtPL011SerialPortLib.inf").
Addressing this issue in a SerialPortLib instance that underlies
BaseDebugLibSerialPort seems wrong; either the DebugLib instance should
cope directly with being called un-constructed (see again commit
91a5b13650), or the DXE Core should log relevant information *at
least* after library instances have been constructed. This patch
implements the latter (only for the "BaseAddress" and "Length" values
calculated by CoreInitializeMemoryServices()).
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201103161557.30621-1-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
CoreInitializeMemoryServices was not checking for any existing memory
allocation created in the HOB producer phase. If there are memory
allocations outside of the region covered by the HOB List then Gcd could
select that region for memory which can result in the memory allocation
to not be handled and memory overwrites.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3028
The FirmwareVolume2Protocol->GetNextFile() produced by DXE Core can be used
to search for a file based on the value of *FileType input. However, this
service will always return EFI_NOT_FOUND if the input FileType is set to
EFI_FV_FILETYPE_MM_STANDALONE or EFI_FV_FILETYPE_MM_CORE_STANDALONE, Which
means user can't use this service to search any standalone MM image in that
FV.
This patch update the FirmwareVolume2Protocol->GetNextFile() service to
support searching standalone MM module.
Signed-off-by: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
OSs are now capable of treating SP and CRYPTO memory as true capabilities
and therefore these should be exposed. This requires usage of a separate
ACCESS_MASK to hide all page-access permission capabilities.
Change in masking and hiding of SP and CRYPTO was introduced in
3bd5c994c8
Signed-off-by: Malgorzata Kukiello <jacek.kukiello@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Cc: Oleksiy Yakovlev <oleksiyy@ami.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel (ARM address) <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
The memory attributes table handling code shared some parts of the
properties table handling code when it was introduced. The latter has
been dropped, and so we can merge the remaining pieces into the former.
Link: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2633
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Bret Barkelew <bret.barkelew@microsoft.com>
Acked-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
This is the minimal change required to stop exposing the EFI properties
table, which is deprecated. Given how the implementation is entangled
with the code that exposes the related memory attributes table, most of
the code is retained, and further cleanups are relegated to subsequent
patches.
Link: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2633
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
Acked-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
EDK2's implementation of the LoadImage() boot service permits non-native
binaries to be loaded (i.e., X64 images on IA32 firmware), but any
attempts to start such an image using StartImage() will return
EFI_UNSUPPORTED.
The integration of the PE/COFF emulator protocol into the DXE core
deviates slightly from this paradigm, given that its IsImageSupported
hook as well as its RegisterImage hook are invoked from LoadImage,
and by the time StartImage is called, no opportunity is given to the
provider of the PE/COFF emulator protocol to prevent an image from
being started if it only supports loading it.
To address this disparity, let's move the invocation of RegisterImage()
to the implementation of the StartImage() boot service, allowing the
emulator to permit LoadImage() but reject StartImage() on images that
turn out not to meet the requirements of the emulator as it is being
started.
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2564
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1869
The UEFI spec requires that if any error occurs in
UninstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces(), EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER is returned
and not the return code of UninstallProtocolInterface().
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
To solve access issue reported by BZ1885, page 0 will be allocated to
avoid misuses if NULL pointer detection is enabled. It should be better
to be freed after EndOfDxe if BIT7 of PcdNullPointerDetectionPropertyMask
is set, because NULL pointer detection is no longer available after
EndOfDxe and there will be no access conflict.
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1885
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
MapMemory is not initialized by FindGuardedMemoryMap
or CoreInternalAllocatePages which calls MapMemory.
So we give a 0 to it.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
An extra 's' slipped into the FvIsBeingProcessed function
name. Drop it to fix the typo.
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
The PI spec (v1.7) correctly specifies "EFI_RUNTIME_EVENT_ENTRY.Event" in
natural language, but the field type in the structure definition itself is
wrong -- it should be EFI_EVENT, not (EFI_EVENT*).
This spec bug is likely unfixable for compatibility reasons, and so edk2
works it around already. We should clearly document the workaround.
Functionally, this patch is a no-op.
(I've also requested a non-normative (informative) clarification for the
PI spec: <https://mantis.uefi.org/mantis/view.php?id=2017>.)
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
The Fpdt driver (FirmwarePerformanceDxe) saves a memory address across
reboots, and then does an AllocatePage for that memory address.
If, on this boot, that memory comes from a Runtime memory bucket,
the MAT table is not updated. This causes Windows to boot into Recovery.
This patch blocks the memory manager from changing the page
from a special bucket to a different memory type. Once the buckets are
allocated, we freeze the memory ranges for the OS, and fragmenting
the special buckets will cause errors resuming from hibernate (S4).
The references to S4 here are the use case that fails. This
failure is root caused to an inconsistent behavior of the
core memory services themselves when type AllocateAddress is used.
The main issue is apparently with the UEFI memory map -- the UEFI memory
map reflects the pre-allocated bins, but the actual allocations at fixed
addresses may go out of sync with that. Everything else, such as:
- EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE (page protections) being out of sync,
- S4 failing
are just symptoms / consequences.
This patch is cherry pick from Project Mu:
a9be767d9b
With the minor change,
1. Update commit message format to keep the message in 80 characters one line.
2. Remove // MU_CHANGE comments in source code.
3. Update comments style to follow edk2 style.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1464
Currently Framework compatibility is not needed and
PcdFrameworkCompatibilitySupport will be removed from edk2.
So remove the usage of this PCD firstly.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
After commit 57df17fe26, some static check reports suspicious NULL pointer
deference at line:
Entry->MachineType = Entry->Emulator->MachineType;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
within function PeCoffEmuProtocolNotify().
However, 'Entry->Emulator' is guaranteed to have a non-NULL value when
previous call to the CoreHandleProtocol() returns EFI_SUCCESS.
This commit will re-write the return status check for CoreHandleProtocol()
to add explicit NULL pointer check for protocol instance pointer.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Now that the EBC machine type is no longer classified as a
natively supported machine type on the architectures that can
support it via the EBC interpreter, the EBC specific handling
in DXE core is no longer used and can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
When encountering PE/COFF images that cannot be supported natively,
attempt to locate an instance of the PE/COFF image emulator protocol,
and if it supports the image, proceed with loading it and register it
with the emulator.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=864
REF: CVE-2018-3630
To follow PI spec, ensure FfsFileHeader 8 bytes aligned.
For the integrity of FV(especially non-MemoryMapped FV) layout,
let CachedFv point to FV beginning, but not (FV + FV header).
And current code only handles (FwVolHeader->ExtHeaderOffset != 0) path,
update code to also handle (FwVolHeader->ExtHeaderOffset == 0) path.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Take MAX_ALLOC_ADDRESS into account in the implementation of the
page allocation routines, so that they will only return memory
that is addressable by the CPU at boot time, even if more memory
is available in the GCD memory map.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Update the GCD memory map initialization code so it disregards
memory that is not addressable by the CPU at boot time. This
only affects the first memory descriptor that is added, other
memory descriptors are permitted that describe memory ranges
that may be accessible to the CPU itself only when executing
under the OS.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1295
This issue originates from following patch which allows to enable
paging if PcdImageProtectionPolicy and PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy
(in addition to PcdSetNxForStack) are set to enable related features.
5267926134
Due to above change, PcdImageProtectionPolicy will be set to 0 by
default in many platforms, which, in turn, cause following code in
MdeModulePkg\Core\Dxe\Misc\MemoryProtection.c fail the creation of
notify event of CpuArchProtocol.
1138: if (mImageProtectionPolicy != 0 ||
PcdGet64 (PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy) != 0) {
1139: Status = CoreCreateEvent (
...
1142: MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify,
...
1145: );
Then following call flow won't be done and Guard pages will not be
set as not-present in SetAllGuardPages() eventually.
MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify()
=> HeapGuardCpuArchProtocolNotify()
=> SetAllGuardPages()
The solution is removing the if(...) statement so that the notify
event will always be created and registered. This won't cause
unnecessary code execution because, in the notify event handler,
the related PCDs like
PcdImageProtectionPolicy and
PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy
will be checked again before doing related jobs.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
At the end of of MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify there's cleanup
code to free resource. But at line 978, 994, 1005 the function returns
directly. This patch use "goto" to replace "return" to make sure the
resource is freed before exit.
1029: CoreCloseEvent (Event);
1030: return;
There's another memory leak after calling gBS->LocateHandleBuffer() in
the same function:
Status = gBS->LocateHandleBuffer (
ByProtocol,
&gEfiLoadedImageProtocolGuid,
NULL,
&NoHandles,
&HandleBuffer
);
HandleBuffer is allocated in above call but never freed. This patch
will also add code to free it.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1286
This issue is introduced by bb685071c2.
The *MemorySpaceMap assigned with NULL (line 1710) value might be
accessed (line 1726/1730) without any sanity check. Although it won't
happen in practice because of line 1722, we still need to add check
against NULL to make static code analyzer happy.
1710 *MemorySpaceMap = NULL;
.... ...
1722 if (DescriptorCount == *NumberOfDescriptors) {
.... ...
1726 Descriptor = *MemorySpaceMap;
.... ...
1730 BuildMemoryDescriptor (Descriptor, Entry);
Tests:
Pass build and boot to shell.
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1277
The failure is caused by data type conversion between UINTN and UINT64,
which is checked in at 63ebde8ef6.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Freed-memory guard is used to detect UAF (Use-After-Free) memory issue
which is illegal access to memory which has been freed. The principle
behind is similar to pool guard feature, that is we'll turn all pool
memory allocation to page allocation and mark them to be not-present
once they are freed.
This also implies that, once a page is allocated and freed, it cannot
be re-allocated. This will bring another issue, which is that there's
risk that memory space will be used out. To address it, the memory
service add logic to put part (at most 64 pages a time) of freed pages
back into page pool, so that the memory service can still have memory
to allocate, when all memory space have been allocated once. This is
called memory promotion. The promoted pages are always from the eldest
pages which haven been freed.
This feature brings another problem is that memory map descriptors will
be increased enormously (200+ -> 2000+). One of change in this patch
is to update MergeMemoryMap() in file PropertiesTable.c to allow merge
freed pages back into the memory map. Now the number can stay at around
510.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
This issue is hidden in current code but exposed by introduction
of freed-memory guard feature due to the fact that the feature
will turn all pool allocation to page allocation.
The solution is moving the memory allocation in CoreGetMemorySpaceMap()
to be out of the GCD memory map lock.
CoreDumpGcdMemorySpaceMap()
=> CoreGetMemorySpaceMap()
=> CoreAcquireGcdMemoryLock () *
AllocatePool()
=> InternalAllocatePool()
=> CoreAllocatePool()
=> CoreAllocatePoolI()
=> CoreAllocatePoolPagesI()
=> CoreAllocatePoolPages()
=> FindFreePages()
=> PromoteMemoryResource()
=> CoreAcquireGcdMemoryLock() **
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Now that Itanium support has been dropped, we can remove the various
occurrences of the ELILO on Itanium PE/COFF header workaround.
Link: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=816
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Removing rules for Ipf sources file:
* Remove the source file which path with "ipf" and also listed in
[Sources.IPF] section of INF file.
* Remove the source file which listed in [Components.IPF] section
of DSC file and not listed in any other [Components] section.
* Remove the embedded Ipf code for MDE_CPU_IPF.
Removing rules for Inf file:
* Remove IPF from VALID_ARCHITECTURES comments.
* Remove DXE_SAL_DRIVER from LIBRARY_CLASS in [Defines] section.
* Remove the INF which only listed in [Components.IPF] section in DSC.
* Remove statements from [BuildOptions] that provide IPF specific flags.
* Remove any IPF sepcific sections.
Removing rules for Dec file:
* Remove [Includes.IPF] section from Dec.
Removing rules for Dsc file:
* Remove IPF from SUPPORTED_ARCHITECTURES in [Defines] section of DSC.
* Remove any IPF specific sections.
* Remove statements from [BuildOptions] that provide IPF specific flags.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chen A Chen <chen.a.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1131
PI spec and BaseTools support to generate multiple FV images
in one FV file.
This patch is to update DxeCore to handle the case.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The functions that are never called have been removed.
They are ClearGuardMapBit,SetGuardMapBit,IsHeadGuard,
IsTailGuard and CoreEfiNotAvailableYetArg0.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1062
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
We want to provide precise info in MemAttribTable
to both OS and SMM, and SMM only gets the info at EndOfDxe.
So we do not update RtCode entry in EndOfDxe.
The impact is that if 3rd part OPROM is runtime, it cannot be executed
at UEFI runtime phase.
Currently, we do not see compatibility issue, because the only runtime
OPROM we found before in UNDI, and UEFI OS will not use UNDI interface
in OS.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
So that the SMM can consume it to set page protection for
the UEFI runtime page with EFI_MEMORY_RO attribute.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
1. Do not use tab characters
2. No trailing white space in one line
3. All files must end with CRLF
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Replace old Perf macros with the new added ones.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
CpuDxe driver is updated to be able to access DXE page table in SMM mode,
which means Heap Guard can get correct memory paging attributes in what
environment. It's not necessary to exclude SMM from detecting Heap Guard
feature support.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Heap Guard feature needs enough memory and paging to work. Otherwise
calling SetMemoryAttributes to change page attribute will fail. This
patch add necessary check of result of calling SetMemoryAttributes.
This can help users to debug their problem in enabling this feature.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
It is caused by 0c9f2cb10b
and false positive.
Initialize CpuArchAttributes to suppress incorrect
compiler/analyzer warnings.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
This patch fixes an issue with VlvTbltDevicePkg introduced
by commit 5b91bf82c6.
The history is as below.
To support heap guard feature, 14dde9e903
added support for SetMemorySpaceAttributes() to handle page attributes,
but after that, a combination of CPU arch attributes and other attributes
was not allowed anymore, for example, UC + RUNTIME. It is a regression.
Then 5b91bf82c6 was to fix the regression,
and we thought 0 CPU arch attributes may be used to clear CPU arch
attributes, so 0 CPU arch attributes was allowed to be sent to
gCpu->SetMemoryAttributes().
But some implementation of CPU driver may return error for 0 CPU arch
attributes. That fails the case that caller just calls
SetMemorySpaceAttributes() with none CPU arch attributes (for example,
RUNTIME), and the purpose of the case is not to clear CPU arch attributes.
This patch filters the call to gCpu->SetMemoryAttributes()
if the requested attributes is 0. It also removes the #define
INVALID_CPU_ARCH_ATTRIBUTES that is no longer used.
Cc: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Yi Li <phoenix.liyi@huawei.com>
Cc: Renhao Liang <liangrenhao@huawei.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
For gDS->SetMemorySpaceAttributes(), when user passes a combined
memory attribute including CPU arch attribute and other attributes,
like EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME, ConverToCpuArchAttributes() will return
INVALID_CPU_ARCH_ATTRIBUTES and skip setting page/cache attribute for
the specified memory space.
We don't see any reason to forbid combining CPU arch attributes and
non-CPU-arch attributes when calling gDS->SetMemorySpaceAttributes(),
so we remove the check code in ConverToCpuArchAttributes(); the
remaining code is enough to grab the interested bits for
Cpu->SetMemoryAttributes().
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Yi Li <phoenix.liyi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Renhao Liang <liangrenhao@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Michael D Kinney
Hua Ma
Rebecca Cran
Laszlo Ersek
Jeff Brasen
Siyuan Fu
Malgorzata Kukiello
Oleksiy Yakovlev
Ard Biesheuvel
Ard Biesheuvel
Heinrich Schuchardt
Jian J Wang
Shenglei Zhang
Philippe Mathieu-Daude
Mike Turner
Dandan Bi
Hao Wu
Star Zeng
Jian J Wang
Chen A Chen
Jiewen Yao
Liming Gao
Heyi Guo