BZ:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1670
During BaseTools compiling under Chinese or Japanese
language Windows, python exception occurring.
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xbd
in position 3528: ordinal not in range(128)
Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Zhiju.Fan <zhijux.fan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
The boundary validation checking in MakeTable() performs on
every loop iteration. This could be improved by checking
just once before the loop.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1329
Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The boundary validation checking in MakeTable() performs on
every loop iteration. This could be improved by checking
just once before the loop.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1329
Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
BZ:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1622
There is duplicated $(PYTHON_COMMAND) in the
command of cleanall
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
If the input parameter AsciiString length is greater
than 255, the GenFv will hang.
This patch is to fix this issue.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
XCODE5 reports warning "equality comparison with extraneous parentheses".
Remove extraneous parentheses around the comparison to silence this warning.
This issue is caused by commit 8daa4278e8.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Bob C <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Warning message is that "equality comparison with extraneous parentheses"
Remove extraneous parentheses around the comparison to silence this warning.
This issue is caused by commit 8daa4278e8.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Bob C <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Bob C <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1415
When an integer constant specified in the .vfr file is
too large for the varstore field it is being used with,
the VFR compiler reports an overflow warning like this:
Test.vfr(693): WARNING: Overflow: Value 1024 is too large to
store in a UINT8
: String to UINT* Overflow
Since Warning does not break the build process,
and it is easy to miss it.
This patch is to update the code to report error and break
the build if meet this kind of issue.
Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1423
There is usage model that SecCore and PeiCore are in different FVs.
Update BaseTools to support this usage model.
Test: Verified on internal platform with the case SecCore and
PeiCore in different FVs and built/booted successfully.
Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
We currently permit R_ARM_GOT_PREL relocations in the ELF32 conversion
routines, under the assumption that relative relocations are fine as
long as the section layout is the same between ELF and PE/COFF.
However, as is the case with any proxy generating relocation, it is
up to the linker to emit an entry in the GOT table and populate it
with the correct absolute address, which should also be fixed up at
PE/COFF load time. Unfortunately, the relocations covering the GOT
section are not emitted into the static relocation sections processed
by GenFw, but only in the dynamic relocation section as a R_ARM_RELATIVE
relocation, and so GenFw fails to emit the correct PE/COFF relocation
data for GOT entries.
Since GOT indirection is pointless anyway for PE/COFF modules running
in UEFI context, let's just drop the references to R_ARM_GOT_PREL from
GenFw, resulting in a build time failure rather than a runtime failure
if such relocations do occur.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The macro MAX_ADDRESS represents the largest virtual address that
is valid for a certain architecture. For the BaseTools, this quantity
is irrelevant, since the same tools can be used to build for different
targets.
Since we only refer to it in a single place, which is an ASSERT() that
doesn't seem particularly useful (it ensures that memcpy() will not
be called with arguments that will make it read beyond the end of the
address space and wrap around), let's drop the ASSERT and all references
to MAX_ADDRESS.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Given that DuetPkg will be removed, tools only used by
DuetPkg can also be removed after its removal operation.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1322
v2:Remove these tools in Makefile and GNUmakefile.
v4:Remove these tools in BinWrappers/PosixLike/ and
UserManuals.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The maximum value that can be represented by the native word size
of the *target* should be irrelevant when compiling tools that
run on the build *host*. So drop the definition of MAX_UINTN, now
that we no longer use it.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Parsing a string into an integer variable of the native word size
is not defined for the BaseTools, since the same tools may be used
to build firmware for different targets with different native word
sizes.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Replace the default size limit of IsDevicePathValid() with a value
that does not depend on the native word size of the build host.
4 GiB seems sufficient as the upper bound of a device path handled
by UEFI.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Since we will be dropping the definition of MAX_UINTN, whose meaning
is ambiguous for the BaseTools, add a definition of MAX_UINT32 that
we can switch to.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Replace invocations of StrHexToUintn() with StrHexToUint64(), so
that we can drop the former.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Don't use the native word size string to number parsing routines,
but instead, use the 64-bit one and cast to UINTN.
Currently, the only user is in Source/C/DevicePath/DevicePathFromText.c
which takes care to use Strtoi64 () unless it assumes the value fits
in 32-bit, so this change is a no-op even on 32-bit build hosts.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
In the context of the BaseTools, there is no such thing as a native word
size, given that the same set of tools may be used to build a firmware
image consisting of both 32-bit and 64-bit modules.
So update StrToIpv4Address() and StrToIpv6Address() to use UINT64
types instead of UINTN types when parsing strings.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
GenVtf C tool is IPF specific. IPF support has been removed
from edk2 trunk. This tool can be removed.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1349
v2:Remove GenVtf in Makefile and GNUmakefile.
v3:Remove BinWrappers/PosixLike/GenVtf and the user manual
of GenVtf.
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1317
This is a regression issue caused by 041d89bc0f.
In Decode() function, once mOutBuf is fully filled, Decode() should return.
Current logic misses the checker of mOutBuf after while() loop.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
V3:
Update the error message for array checker.
V2:
1. Add comments for each ASSERT.
2. ASSERT need to skip the case of array size of array as zero. For
example, TestArray[] in struct in header file.
V1:
For structure PCD,
1. use compiler time assert to check the array index, report error
if array index exceeds the array number.
2. use compiler time assert to check the array size, report error
if the user declared size in header file is smaller than the user
defined in DEC/DSC file.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: ZhiqiangX Zhao <zhiqiangx.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Add one new option --uefi to enable UefiCompress.
(re-add this patch since it be reverted in Python3 migration patches,
but this patch is not related with Python3)
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Yunhua Feng <yunhuax.feng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
the PyUtility is not used, so we remove it.
(re-add this patch since it be reverted in Python3 migration patches,
but this check is not related with Python3)
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
This reverts commit 6693f359b3c213513c5096a06c6f67244a44dc52..
678f851312.
Python3 migration is the fundamental change. It requires every developer
to install Python3. Before this migration, the well communication and wide
verification must be done. But now, most people is not aware of this change,
and not try it. So, Python3 migration is reverted and be moved to edk2-staging
Python3 branch for the edk2 user evaluation.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
the PyUtility is not used, so we remove it.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Add NmakeSubdirs.py to replace NmakeSubdirs.bat in VS Makefile. This script will
invoke nmake in multi thread mode. It can save more than half time of BaseTools
C clean build.
GCC make supports multiple thread in make phase. So, GNUmakefile doesn't need apply
this script.
single task or job=1:
just single thread and invoke subprocess,subprocess will use
system.stdout to print output.
multi task:
thread number is logic cpu count.All subprocess output will pass to
python script by PIPE and then script print it to system.stdout.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Dongao Guo<dongao.guo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Test-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
In commit 81502cee20 ("BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_LDFLAGS from the
caller", 2018-08-16), I missed that "VfrCompile/GNUmakefile" does not use
BUILD_LFLAGS in the APPLICATION linking rule, unlike "app.makefile" does.
Instead, "VfrCompile/GNUmakefile" uses the (undefined) LFLAGS macro.
Therefore commit 81502cee20 did not cover the linking step of
VfrCompile.
Thankfully, the structure of the linking rules is the same, between
"app.makefile" and "VfrCompile/GNUmakefile". Rename the undefined LFLAGS
macro in "VfrCompile/GNUmakefile" to VFR_LFLAGS (for consistency with
VFR_CXXFLAGS), and set it to EXTRA_LDFLAGS.
As a result, we have:
| compilation | linking
-----------+--------------------------------+----------------------
VfrCompile | VFR_CXXFLAGS = | VFR_LFLAGS =
| BUILD_OPTFLAGS = | EXTRA_LDFLAGS
| '-O2' + EXTRA_OPTFLAGS |
-----------+--------------------------------+----------------------
other apps | BUILD_CFLAGS/BUILD_CXXFLAGS = | BUILD_LFLAGS =
| [...] + BUILD_OPTFLAGS = | [...] + EXTRA_LDFLAGS
| [...] + '-O2' + EXTRA_OPTFLAGS |
This table shows
- that the VfrCompile compilation and linking flags are always a subset of
the corresponding flags used by the other apps,
- and that the EXTRA flags are always at the end.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540244
Fixes: 81502cee20
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Allow the caller of the top-level makefile either to set EXTRA_LDFLAGS in
the environment or to pass EXTRA_LDFLAGS as a macro definition on the
command line. EXTRA_LDFLAGS extends (and potentially overrides) default
link-editing flags set in the makefiles.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540244
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Allow the caller of the top-level makefile either to set EXTRA_OPTFLAGS in
the environment or to pass EXTRA_OPTFLAGS as a macro definition on the
command line. EXTRA_OPTFLAGS extends (and potentially overrides) default C
compilation flags set in the makefiles.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540244
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The option "-O2" is not a preprocessor flag, but a code generation
(compilation) flag. Move it from BUILD_CPPFLAGS to BUILD_CFLAGS and
BUILD_CXXFLAGS.
Because "VfrCompile/GNUmakefile" uses "-O2" through BUILD_CPPFLAGS, and
because it doesn't use BUILD_CXXFLAGS, we have to introduce BUILD_OPTFLAGS
separately, so that "VfrCompile/GNUmakefile" can continue using just this
flag.
This patch doesn't change behavior.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540244
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Option "-c" is a mode selection flag (choosing between compiling and
linking); it should not be in BUILD_CFLAGS, which applies only to
compiling anyway. The compilation rule for C source files, in
"footer.makefile", already includes "-c" -- currently we have double "-c"
options.
This patch doesn't change behavior.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540244
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
BUILD_CPPFLAGS should be expanded before BUILD_CFLAGS. (The rule for C++
source files already does this, with BUILD_CPPFLAGS and BUILD_CXXFLAGS.)
This patch doesn't change behavior.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540244
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Adds support for the following X64 ELF relocations to GenFw
R_X86_64_GOTPCREL
R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX
R_X86_64_REX_GOTPCRELX
Background:
The GCC49 and GCC5 toolchains use the small pie model for X64. In the
small pie model, gcc emits a GOTPCREL relocation whenever C code takes
the address of a global function. The emission of GOTPCREL is mitigated
by several factors
1. In GCC49, all global symbols are declared hidden thereby eliminating
the emission of GOTPCREL.
2. In GCC5, LTO is used. In LTO, the complier first creates intermediate
representation (IR) files. During the static link stage, the LTO compiler
combines all IR files as a single compilation unit, using linker symbol
assistance to generate code. Any global symbols defined in the IR that
are not referenced from outside the IR are converted to local symbols -
thereby eliminating the emission of GOTPCREL for them.
3. The linker (binutils ld) further transforms any GOTPCREL used with
the movq opcode to a direct rip-relative relocation used with the leaq
opcode. This linker optimization can be disabled with the option
-Wl,--no-relax. Furthermore, gcc is able to emit GOTPCREL with other
opcodes
- pushq opcode for passing arguments to functions.
- addq/subq opcodes for pointer arithmetic.
These other opcode uses are not transformed by the linker.
Ultimately, in GCC5 there are some emissions of GOTPCREL that survive
all these mitigations - if C code takes the address of a global function
defined in assembly code - and performs pointer arithmetic on the
address - then the GOTPCREL remains in the final linker product.
A GOTPCREL relocation today causes the build to stop since GenFw does
not handle them. It is possible to eliminate any remaining GOTPCREL
emissions by manually declaring the global symbols causing them to have
hidden visibility. This patch is offered instead to allow GenFw to
handle any residual GOTPCREL.
Cc: Shi Steven <steven.shi@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Zenith432 <zenith432@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>