The functions that are never called have been removed.
They are UfsPeimUnlinkMemBlock,UfsPeimRequestSense,
UfsPeimInquiry,UfsRwAttributes,UfsClearFlag,UfsReadFlag
and UfsFindAvailableSlotInTmrl.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1062
v2: Remove the comment that mentioned 'UfsPeimUnlinkMemBlock'
within function UfsPeimFreeMemPool().
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
1. Do not use tab characters
2. No trailing white space in one line
3. All files must end with CRLF
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
V2 changes:
Resource cleanup logic update in UfsEndOfPei().
V1 history:
Update the UfsBlockIoPei driver to consume IOMMU_PPI to allocate DMA
buffer.
If no IOMMU_PPI exists, this driver still calls PEI service
to allocate DMA buffer, with assumption that DRAM==DMA.
This is a compatible change.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
According to the Universal Flash Storage (UFS) Version 2.1 (JESD220C) spec
Section 10.7.8.5, the DATA SEGMENT LENGTH field of the UPIU shall also be
set to number of descriptor bytes to write.
The origin codes miss the above operation.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
In function UfsBlockIoPeimGetMediaInfo(), the following expression:
Private->Media[DeviceIndex].LastBlock = (Capacity16.LastLba3 << 24) |
(Capacity16.LastLba2 << 16) |
(Capacity16.LastLba1 << 8) |
Capacity16.LastLba0;
(There is also a similar case in this function.)
will involve undefined behavior in signed left shift operations.
Since Capacity16.LastLbaX is of type UINT8, and
Private->Media[DeviceIndex].LastBlock is of type UINT64. Therefore,
Capacity16.LastLbaX will be promoted to int (32 bits, signed) first, and
then perform the left shift operation.
According to the C11 spec, Section 6.5.7:
4 The result of E1 << E2 is E1 left-shifted E2 bit positions; vacated
bits are filled with zeros. If E1 has an unsigned type, the value
of the result is E1 * 2^E2 , reduced modulo one more than the
maximum value representable in the result type. If E1 has a signed
type and nonnegative value, and E1 * 2^E2 is representable in the
result type, then that is the resulting value; otherwise, the
behavior is undefined.
So if bit 7 of Capacity16.LastLba3 is 1, (Capacity16.LastLba3 << 24) will
be out of the range within int type. The undefined behavior of the signed
left shift will lead to a potential of setting the high 32 bits of
Private->Media[DeviceIndex].LastBlock to 1 during the cast from type int
to type UINT64.
This commit will add an explicit UINT32 type cast for Capacity16.LastLba3
to resolve this issue.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
There are cases that the operands of an expression are all with rank less
than UINT64/INT64 and the result of the expression is explicitly cast to
UINT64/INT64 to fit the target size.
An example will be:
UINT32 a,b;
// a and b can be any unsigned int type with rank less than UINT64, like
// UINT8, UINT16, etc.
UINT64 c;
c = (UINT64) (a + b);
Some static code checkers may warn that the expression result might
overflow within the rank of "int" (integer promotions) and the result is
then cast to a bigger size.
The commit refines codes by the following rules:
1). When the expression is possible to overflow the range of unsigned int/
int:
c = (UINT64)a + b;
2). When the expression will not overflow within the rank of "int", remove
the explicit type casts:
c = a + b;
3). When the expression will be cast to pointer of possible greater size:
UINT32 a,b;
VOID *c;
c = (VOID *)(UINTN)(a + b); --> c = (VOID *)((UINTN)a + b);
4). When one side of a comparison expression contains only operands with
rank less than UINT32:
UINT8 a;
UINT16 b;
UINTN c;
if ((UINTN)(a + b) > c) {...} --> if (((UINT32)a + b) > c) {...}
For rule 4), if we remove the 'UINTN' type cast like:
if (a + b > c) {...}
The VS compiler will complain with warning C4018 (signed/unsigned
mismatch, level 3 warning) due to promoting 'a + b' to type 'int'.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
The OCS value should be initiliazed as 0x0F according to UFS spec.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
When UPIU packet is sent, (BIT0 << Slot) should be set according
to context. But BIT0 is used without Slot when UfsWaitMemSet ()
is invoked.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
According to UFS Host Controller Spec(JESD223), the bits 1:0 of this
DataByteCount field shall be 11b to indicate Dword granularity.
But the size of UFS Request Sense Data Response defined in UFS Spec
(JESD220C) is 18 which is not Dword aligned, we would have to round
down to the multiple of 4 to fill the DBC field to avoid bring issue
on some UFS HCs.
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
- abstrated to abstracted
- accessibla to accessible
- addres to address
- apropriate to appropriate
- arry to array
- availabe to available
- avaliable to available
- becasue to because
- correponding to corresponding
- etablished to established
- exeuction to execution
- extensiable to extensible
- fileds to fields
- loadding to loading
- ptototypes to prototypes
- prococol protocol
- requried to required
- resoruce to resource
- runing to running
- uild to build
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Giri P Mudusuru <giri.p.mudusuru@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
It includes 4 drivers:
1. UfsPassThruDxe, which is a UEFI driver and consumes EFI_UFS_HOST_CONTROLLER_PROTOCOL and produces EFI_EXT_SCSI_PASS_THRU_PROTOCOL
2. UfsPciHcDxe, which is specific for pci-based UFS HC implementation and is a UEFI driver to produce EFI_UFS_HOST_CONTROLLER_PROTOCOL.
3. UfsBlockIoPei, which is a PEI driver and consumes EFI_UFS_HOST_CONTROLLER_PPI and produces EFI_PEI_VIRTUAL_BLOCK_IO_PPI.
4. UfsPciHcPei, which is specific for pci-based UFS HC implementation and is a PEI driver to produce EFI_UFS_HOST_CONTROLLER_PPI.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17246 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
shenglei
Liming Gao
Hao Wu
Haojian Zhuang
Feng Tian
Giri P Mudusuru
Jordan Justen