Mark EFI_VARIABLE_AUTHENTICATED_WRITE_ACCESS as deprecated.
1. Make SetVariable/QueryVariableInfo return EFI_UNSUPPORTED with this
attribute
2. No change to GetVariable/GetNextVariableName
Also update several function descriptors accordingly
Cc: Long Qin <qin.long@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Long Qin <qin.long@intel.com>
VariableRuntimeDxe deletes and locks the MorLock variable in
MorLockInit(), with the argument that any protection provided by MorLock
can be circumvented if MorLock can be overwritten by unprivileged code
(i.e., outside of SMM).
Extend the argument and the logic to the MOR variable, which is supposed
to be protected by MorLock. Pass Attributes=0 when deleting MorLock and
MOR both.
This change was suggested by Star; it is inspired by earlier VariableSmm
commit fda8f631ed ("MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: delete and lock
OS-created MOR variable", 2017-10-03).
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
According to the TCG Platform Reset Attack Mitigation Specification (May
15, 2008):
> 5 Interface for UEFI
> 5.1 UEFI Variable
> 5.1.1 The MemoryOverwriteRequestControl
>
> Start of informative comment:
>
> [...] The OS loader should not create the variable. Rather, the firmware
> is required to create it and must support the semantics described here.
>
> End of informative comment.
However, some OS kernels create the MOR variable even if the platform
firmware does not support it (see one Bugzilla reference below). This OS
issue breaks the logic added in the last patch.
Strengthen the MOR check by searching for the TCG or TCG2 protocols, as
edk2's implementation of MOR depends on (one of) those protocols.
The protocols are defined under MdePkg, thus there's no inter-package
dependency issue. In addition, calling UEFI services in
MorLockInitAtEndOfDxe() is safe, due to the following order of events /
actions:
- platform BDS signals the EndOfDxe event group,
- the SMM core installs the SmmEndOfDxe protocol,
- MorLockInitAtEndOfDxe() is invoked, and it calls UEFI services,
- some time later, platform BDS installs the DxeSmmReadyToLock protocol,
- SMM / SMRAM is locked down and UEFI services become unavailable to SMM
drivers.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498159
Suggested-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>
The "MemoryOverwriteRequestControl" (a.k.a. MOR) variable comes from the
"TCG Platform Reset Attack Mitigation Specification":
https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/Platform-Reset-Attack-Mitigation-Specification.pdf
The "MemoryOverwriteRequestControlLock" variable (a.k.a. MORL) is a
Microsoft extension, called "Secure MOR implementation":
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/bringup/device-guard-requirements
Currently the VariableSmm driver creates MORL without regard to MOR. This
can lead to a situation where a platform does not support MOR from the
prerequisite spec (because it does not include the
"SecurityPkg/Tcg/MemoryOverwriteControl/TcgMor.inf" driver), but appears
to support MORL from the dependent Microsoft spec.
"winload.efi" notices this inconsistency, and disables the Device Guard
Virtualization Based Security in Windows Server 2016 and Windows 10 64-bit
Enterprise.
If the platform includes
"SecurityPkg/Tcg/MemoryOverwriteControl/TcgMor.inf", then MOR will exist
by the time EndOfDxe is reached, and VariableSmm can safely create MORL.
Otherwise, do not create MORL (delete it if it exists), and also prevent
other modules from creating it.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496170
Reported-by: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>
The SetMorLockVariable() function sets "mMorLockPassThru" to TRUE
temporarily, so that it can set the MOR Control Lock variable to
well-formed values without permission checks.
In the next patch, we'll need the same override for deleting the MOR
Control Lock variable; hence obey "mMorLockPassThru" in the deletion
branch of SetVariableCheckHandlerMorLock() as well.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>
Introduce the MorLockInitAtEndOfDxe() hook, in order to allow
MorLockInit() to delay / queue operations until EndOfDxe. (Or, if the
platform never signals EndOfDxe, until ReadyToBoot.)
Call MorLockInitAtEndOfDxe() whenever we set "mEndOfDxe" to TRUE:
- in VariableRuntimeDxe:
- in the OnReadyToBoot() function,
- in the OnEndOfDxe() function;
- in VariableSmm:
- on the SMM_VARIABLE_FUNCTION_READY_TO_BOOT SMI request,
- in the SmmEndOfDxeCallback() function.
For now, implement MorLockInitAtEndOfDxe() as a no-op in both
VariableRuntimeDxe and VariableSmm.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>
The MorLockInit() and SetVariableCheckHandlerMor() functions have separate
implementations for VariableRuntimeDxe (= unprivileged, unified
DXE_RUNTIME driver) and VariableSmm (= privileged, DXE_SMM back-end of the
split variable driver).
Move their declarations from "Variable.c" to "PrivilegePolymorphic.h", so
that the compiler enforce that the declarations and the definitions match.
(All C source files with the call sites and the function definitions
already include "PrivilegePolymorphic.h" via "Variable.h".)
At the same time:
- replace two typos in the MorLockInit() description:
- replace "EFI_SUCEESS" with "EFI_SUCCESS",
- replace "MOR Lock Control" with "MOR Control Lock";
- in the SetVariableCheckHandlerMor() description:
- replace @param with @param[in],
- correct the description of the Attributes parameter (suggested by Star
Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>),
- rewrap the comment to 80 columns.
This change cleans up commit 2f6aa774fe ("MdeModulePkg: Add MorLock to
variable driver.", 2016-01-19).
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>
If the platform supports SMM, a gRT->SetVariable() call at boot time
results in the following call tree to SecureBootHook():
RuntimeServiceSetVariable() [VariableSmmRuntimeDxe.c, unprivileged]
SmmVariableHandler() [VariableSmm.c, PRIVILEGED]
VariableServiceSetVariable() [Variable.c, PRIVILEGED]
SecureBootHook() [VariableSmm.c, PRIVILEGED]
//
// do nothing
//
SecureBootHook() [Measurement.c, unprivileged]
//
// measure variable if it
// is related to SB policy
//
And if the platform does not support SMM:
VariableServiceSetVariable() [Variable.c, unprivileged]
SecureBootHook() [Measurement.c, unprivileged]
//
// measure variable if it
// is related to SB policy
//
In other words, the measurement always happens outside of SMM.
Because there are two implementations of the SecureBootHook() API, one
that is called from SMM and does nothing, and another that is called
outside of SMM and measures variables, the function declaration should be
in a header file. This way the compiler can enforce that the function
declaration and all function definitions match.
"Variable.h" is used for "including common header files, defining internal
structures and functions used by Variable modules". Technically, we could
declare SecureBootHook() in "Variable.h". However, "Measurement.c" and
"VariableSmmRuntimeDxe.c" themselves do not include "Variable.h", and that
is likely intentional -- "Variable.h" exposes so much of the privileged
variable implementation that it is likely excluded from these C source
files on purpose.
Therefore introduce a new header file called "PrivilegePolymorphic.h".
"Variable.h" includes this header (so that all C source files that have
been allowed to see the variable internals learn about the new
SecureBootHook() declaration immediately). In "Measurement.c" and
"VariableSmmRuntimeDxe.c", include *only* the new header.
This change cleans up commit fa0737a839 ("MdeModulePkg Variable: Merge
from Auth Variable driver in SecurityPkg", 2015-07-01).
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>
"The size must be large enough to fit input string supplied in
VariableName buffer" is added in the description for VariableNameSize.
And two cases of EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER are added.
1. The input values of VariableName and VendorGuid are not a name and
GUID of an existing variable.
2. Null-terminator is not found in the first VariableNameSize bytes of
the input VariableName buffer.
This patch is to update code to follow them.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
PI 1.5 spec has minor update to the Data parameter for PEI
GetVariable(), and no real functional behavior change.
The modifier of Data parameter:
OUT VOID *Data
->
OUT VOID *Data OPTIONAL
The comments of Data parameter:
Data Points to the buffer which will hold the returned variable value.
->
Data Points to the buffer which will hold the returned variable value.
May be NULL with a zero DataSize in order to determine the size of the buffer needed.
The patch is to follow the spec to update the implementation.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
There are cases that the operands of an expression are all with rank less
than UINT64/INT64 and the result of the expression is explicitly cast to
UINT64/INT64 to fit the target size.
An example will be:
UINT32 a,b;
// a and b can be any unsigned int type with rank less than UINT64, like
// UINT8, UINT16, etc.
UINT64 c;
c = (UINT64) (a + b);
Some static code checkers may warn that the expression result might
overflow within the rank of "int" (integer promotions) and the result is
then cast to a bigger size.
The commit refines codes by the following rules:
1). When the expression is possible to overflow the range of unsigned int/
int:
c = (UINT64)a + b;
2). When the expression will not overflow within the rank of "int", remove
the explicit type casts:
c = a + b;
3). When the expression will be cast to pointer of possible greater size:
UINT32 a,b;
VOID *c;
c = (VOID *)(UINTN)(a + b); --> c = (VOID *)((UINTN)a + b);
4). When one side of a comparison expression contains only operands with
rank less than UINT32:
UINT8 a;
UINT16 b;
UINTN c;
if ((UINTN)(a + b) > c) {...} --> if (((UINT32)a + b) > c) {...}
For rule 4), if we remove the 'UINTN' type cast like:
if (a + b > c) {...}
The VS compiler will complain with warning C4018 (signed/unsigned
mismatch, level 3 warning) due to promoting 'a + b' to type 'int'.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
For pointer subtraction, the result is of type "ptrdiff_t". According to
the C11 standard (Committee Draft - April 12, 2011):
"When two pointers are subtracted, both shall point to elements of the
same array object, or one past the last element of the array object; the
result is the difference of the subscripts of the two array elements. The
size of the result is implementation-defined, and its type (a signed
integer type) is ptrdiff_t defined in the <stddef.h> header. If the result
is not representable in an object of that type, the behavior is
undefined."
In our codes, there are cases that the pointer subtraction is not
performed by pointers to elements of the same array object. This might
lead to potential issues, since the behavior is undefined according to C11
standard.
Also, since the size of type "ptrdiff_t" is implementation-defined. Some
static code checkers may warn that the pointer subtraction might underflow
first and then being cast to a bigger size. For example:
UINT8 *Ptr1, *Ptr2;
UINTN PtrDiff;
...
PtrDiff = (UINTN) (Ptr1 - Ptr2);
The commit will refine the pointer subtraction expressions by casting each
pointer to UINTN first and then perform the subtraction:
PtrDiff = (UINTN) Ptr1 - (UINTN) Ptr2;
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Measure DBT into PCR[7] when it is updated between initial measure
if present and not empty. by following TCG PC Client PFP 00.49
Previous patch for PCR[7] DBT part is overrode.
dc9bd6ed28
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Yao Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yao Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Use UEFI_VARIABLE_DATA data structure according to TCG PC-Client PFP Spec
00.21.
http://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/PC-ClientSpecific_Platform_Profile_for_TPM_2p0_Systems_v21.pdf
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Yao Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yao Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Measure DBT into PCR[7] when it is updated between initial measure and
ExitBootService. Measure "SecureBoot" change after PK update.
Spec version : TCG PC Client PFP 00.37. http://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/PC-ClientSpecific_Platform_Profile_for_TPM_2p0_Systems_v21.pdf
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Yao Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yao Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290
Current SmmVariableGetStatistics() in VariableSmm.c is always
checking input InfoSize against the first variable info,
it is incorrect.
For instance, there are three variables.
BootOrder
Boot0000
Boot0001
If the input InfoEntry is holding the second variable info (Boot0000)
and InfoSize is sizeof (VARIABLE_INFO_ENTRY) + StrSize (L"Boot0000"),
current code will return EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL, but it should return
the third variable info (Boot0001).
This patch is to refine the code logic.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Current code in SmmVariableHandler() checks CommBufferSize
buffer to make sure it points to outside SMRAM in
"case SMM_VARIABLE_FUNCTION_GET_STATISTICS".
But after eaae7b33b1,
CommBufferSize buffer points to SMRAM that was used by
SMM core to cache CommSize from SmmCommunication protocol,
then the check will fail definitely and GET_STATISTICS
feature breaks.
In fact, do not need check CommBufferSize buffer at all
even before eaae7b33b1.
Before eaae7b33b1,
CommBufferSize buffer pointed to gSmmCorePrivate->BufferSize
that is outside SMRAM, the check will success definitely;
after eaae7b33b1,
CommBufferSize buffer points to local variable BufferSize
(in SMRAM) in SmmEntryPoint(), the check is not needed
definitely.
The patch is to remove the check.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Instead of comparing a GUID with gZeroGuid via the CompareGuid API, the
commit uses the IsZeroGuid API to check if the given GUID is a zero GUID.
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@Intel.com>
Current GetVariable implementation will return the first variable for
empty str VariableName, it is because GetVariable and GetNextVariablename
are sharing same function FindVariable.
But UEFI sepc defines SetVariable that If VariableName is an empty string,
then EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER is returned, that means an empty string variable
could never be set successfully, so GetVariable should return error for
empty string VariableName.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
UEFI 2.6 spec has minor update to the Data parameter for GetVariable(),
and no real functional behavior change.
The modifier of Data parameter:
OUT VOID *Data
->
OUT VOID *Data OPTIONAL
The comments of Data parameter:
Data The buffer to return the contents of the variable.
->
Data The buffer to return the contents of the variable. May be NULL
with a zero DataSize in order to determine the size buffer needed.
The patch is to follow the spec to update the implementation.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@19771 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Per secure MOR implementation document, it is not proper to add MOR lock in non-SMM version, because DXE version can not provide protection.
This patch add standalone TcgMorLockDxe implementation.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Zhang, Chao B" <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@19689 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Microsoft published secure MOR implementation at https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/mt270973(v=vs.85).aspx
with revision 2 update. See URL for tech detail.
Previous revision 1 is handled in SecurityPkg\Tcg\ MemoryOverwriteRequestControlLock.
But the VarCheck API can not satisfy revision 2 requirement.
So we decide include MOR lock control into variable driver directly.
This patch add standalone TcgMorLockSmm implementation.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Zhang, Chao B" <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@19688 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Variable driver uses gEdkiiFaultTolerantWriteGuid hob and copies data to NvStorageData if hob exists.
But if ftw driver executes prior to variable driver then spare block is erased.
So the patch is to enhance the code to do not check FTW last write data hob if FTW protocol has been installed.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reported-by: Baraneedharan Anbazhagan <anbazhagan@hp.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Baraneedharan Anbazhagan <anbazhagan@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@19577 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
The code wrongly has TempFlag wrote to NV flash, but has Flag assigned to NV cache.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@19573 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
HwErrVariableTotalSize/CommonVariableTotalSize/CommonUserVariableTotalSize
need to be initialized to 0 first after reclaim failed, then to be assigned by += operation.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@19572 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Xcode fails to compile:
error: array type 'VA_LIST' (aka '__builtin_va_list') is not assignable
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@19419 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
This change is triggered by R18654 "Enhance variable performance by reading from existed memory cache"
that changed the code to use CacheVariable to improve performance.
So the CacheVariable->InDeletedTransitionPtr NULL pointer check needs to be moved to the place before
it is been used.
Cc: Shumin Qiu <shumin.qiu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shumin Qiu <shumin.qiu@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18688 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Current variable driver already have memory cache to improve performance.
Change the code which read from physical MMIO address to read from memory cache.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Derek Lin <derek.lin2@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <elhaj@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18654 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Otherwise there will be build failure if without VarCheckUefiLib linked.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18612 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Since the variable check service has be separated to VarCheckLib
from Variable driver, so update Variable driver to consume the
separated VarCheckLib.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18286 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
between variable HOB and NV storage.
Variable HOB may be built by a system that supports and loads variable
default, the variables in the HOB will be flush to NV storage after
variable write search ready.
After that, if the variable's Attributes is changed by someone and
system reboots and tries to load default again, the variable Attributes
mismatch case between variable HOB and NV storage will appear.
Original code did not handle the case correctly, that may eventually
cause NV storage contains two valid same variables that will lead to
system hang if GetNextVariableName() called.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18225 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
This fix is used to solve VS2015 warning "local variable is not initialized before use"
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18108 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
As variable HEADER_ALIGNMENT = 4, the MonotonicCount in
AUTHENTICATED_VARIABLE_HEADER may be not UINT64 aligned,
so go to use ReadUnaligned64() to ensure read data correctly.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@18064 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
MdeModulePkg has defined gZeroGuid in 'Guid/ZeroGuid.h', therefore, the
mZeroGuid defined in Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe is redundant.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17840 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
1. When Property->Attributes == 0, don't check input Attributes.
2. Enhance comments to be indent aligned and debug message
to be aligned with other messages.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17794 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
What to do:
1. Merge from Auth Variable driver in SecurityPkg to Variable drive in
MdeModulePkg. Then the merged Variable driver in MdeModulePkg will
link to AuthVariableLib and TpmMeasurementLib.
AuthVariableLibNull and TpmMeasurementLibNull in MdeModulePkg
could be used for non auth variable support.
AuthVariableLib and DxeTpmMeasurementLib in SecurityPkg
may be used for auth variable support.
Why to do:
1. Remove code duplication and reduce maintenance effort.
After auth variable service separated from Auth Variable driver in SecurityPkg
to AuthVariableLib. The remaining code logic of Auth Variable driver in SecurityPkg
will be almost same with Variable driver in MdeModulePkg. Now it is to
merge them.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17765 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
What to do:
1. Add AuthVariableLib LibraryClass definitions.
2. Implement a NULL AuthVariableLib library instance.
3. Add VARIABLE_ENTRY_PROPERTY definition to VarCheck.h.
4. Add VARIABLE_ENTRY_CONSISTENCY and variable attribute
combinations definitions to VariableFormat.h.
Why to do:
1. Share code.
1.1. Separate auth variable service from Auth Variable driver in
SecurityPkg to AuthVariableLib. Then the AuthVariableLib could benefit
and be used by different implementation of Auth Variable drivers.
1.2 The VARIABLE_ENTRY_PROPERTY definition to VarCheck.h,
VARIABLE_ENTRY_CONSISTENCY and variable attribute
combinations definitions to VariableFormat.h will be shared
by merged Variable driver and AuthVariableLib.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17757 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
What to do:
1. Merge from VariablePei in SecurityPkg to VariablePei in MdeModulePkg.
Why to do:
1. Remove code duplication and reduce maintenance effort.
The code logic of VariablePei in SecurityPkg is same with VariablePei
in MdeModulePkg.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@17756 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Zhang, Chao B
Laszlo Ersek
Star Zeng
Hao Wu
Gary Lin
Zenith432
Liming Gao
Yao, Jiewen
Andrew Fish
Jordan Justen
Derek Lin
Michael D Kinney
Qiu Shumin