The debug messages can help developer to know the pre-memory
allocation usage.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695
Within function CoreRestoreTpl(), left shift a negative value -2 is used
in:
"while (((-2 << NewTpl) & gEventPending) != 0) {"
which involves undefined behavior.
According to the C11 spec, Section 6.5.7:
> 4 The result of E1 << E2 is E1 left-shifted E2 bit positions; vacated
> bits are filled with zeros. If E1 has an unsigned type, the value
> of the result is E1 * 2^E2 , reduced modulo one more than the
> maximum value representable in the result type. If E1 has a signed
> type and nonnegative value, and E1 * 2^E2 is representable in the
> result type, then that is the resulting value; otherwise, the
> behavior is undefined.
This commit refines the code logic to avoid left shifting the negative
value.
Cc: Steven Shi <steven.shi@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Follow PI 1.6 spec to support FFS_ATTRIB_DATA_ALIGNMENT_2 for
FFS alignment extended to support maximum 16MB.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Change since v4: Revise the patch based on V4 sent by Amit Kumar
1) Only return the corresponding protocol interface in *Interface
if the return status is EFI_SUCCESS or EFI_ALREADY_STARTED.
2) Interface is returned unmodified for all error conditions except
EFI_UNSUPPORTED and EFI_ALREADY_STARTED, NULL will be returned in
*Interface when EFI_UNSUPPORTED and Attributes is not
EFI_OPEN_PROTOCOL_TEST_PROTOCOL, the protocol interface will be
returned in *Interface when EFI_ALREADY_STARTED.
Change since v3:
1) Fixed issue when Attributes = EFI_OPEN_PROTOCOL_TEST_PROTOCOL
and Inteface = NULL case. [Reported by:star.zeng at intel.com]
Change Since v2:
1) Modified to use EFI_ERROR to get status code
Change since v1:
1) Fixed typo protocal to protocol
2) Fixed coding style
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Amit Kumar <amit.ak@samsung.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Gabriel Somlo <gsomlo@gmail.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar <amit.ak@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Gabriel Somlo <gsomlo@gmail.com>
From GCD perspective, its SetMemorySpaceAttributes() method doesn't accept page
related attributes. That means users cannot use it to change page attributes,
and have to turn to CPU arch protocol to do it, which is not be allowed by PI
spec.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Support pre memory page allocation.
Support FreePages.
Allocation made prior to permanent memory will be
migrated to permanent memory and the HOB updated.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <Ruiyu.Ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
When double free pages by FreePages() or allocate allocated pages by
AllocatePages() with AllocateAddress type, the code will print debug
message "ConvertPages: Incompatible memory types", but the debug
message is not very obvious for the error paths by FreePages() or
AllocatePages().
Refer https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2017-August/013075.html
for the discussion.
This patch is to enhance the debug message for the error paths by
FreePages() or AllocatePages.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667
reported there is double free pages on LoadImage failure path.
CoreLoadPeImage()
...
return EFI_SUCCESS;
Done:
//
// Free memory.
//
if (DstBufAlocated) {
CoreFreePages (Image->ImageContext.ImageAddress, Image->NumberOfPages);
}
...
CoreUnloadAndCloseImage()
...
if ((Image->ImageBasePage != 0) && FreePage) {
CoreFreePages (Image->ImageBasePage, Image->NumberOfPages);
}
...
This patch is to follow the suggestion at
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2017-August/013112.html
to set Image->ImageContext.ImageAddress and Image->ImageBasePage to 0
after the free in CoreLoadPeImage().
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
If the EFI_SEC_HOB_DATA_PPI is in the list of PPIs passed to the PEI
entry point, the PEI Foundation will call the GetHobs() member
function and install all HOBs returned into the HOB list. It does
this after installing all PPIs passed from SEC into the PPI database
and before dispatching any PEIMs.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
InstallPpi() will be used for normal PPI in PPI list from SEC,
and NotifyPpi() will be used for notification PPI in PPI list from SEC.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The patch fixes two kinds of bugs in DxeCore that accesses memory
which might be freed or owned by other modules.
The two bugs don't cause functionality issue.
1. CoreValidateHandle() checks whether the handle is valid by
validating its signature. The proper way is to check whether
the handle is in the handle database.
2. CoreDisconnectControllersUsingProtocolInterface() and
CoreOpenProtocol() de-reference Link pointer which is
already freed. The proper way is to not de-reference the pointer.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
There is a case that ExtractGuidedSectionGetInfo return 0 for
ScratchBufferSize and ScratchBuffer will be NULL, after AllocatePool
fails to allocate buffer for AllocatedOutputBuffer, the code will
call FreePool (ScratchBuffer), but ScratchBuffer == NULL.
This patch is to only free ScratchBuffer when it is not NULL.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Change since v3:
1) Fixed issue when Attributes = EFI_OPEN_PROTOCOL_TEST_PROTOCOL
and Inteface = NULL case. [Reported by:star.zeng at intel.com]
Change Since v2:
1) Modified to use EFI_ERROR to get status code
Change since v1:
1) Fixed typo protocal to protocol
2) Fixed coding style
Modified source code to update Interface as per spec.
1) In case of Protocol is un-supported, interface should be returned NULL.
2) In case of any error, interface should not be modified.
3) In case of Test Protocol, interface is optional.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar <amit.ak@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Current code is using debug message like below for
InstallProtocolInterface.
InstallProtocolInterface: XXXXXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXX XXX
User could not know whether the installation is failed or not by the
debug message, for example, the code below does not initialize Handle
before calling InstallProtocolInterface, EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER will be
returned.
EFI_HANDLE Handle;
Status = gBS->InstallProtocolInterface (
&Handle,
&XXX,
EFI_NATIVE_INTERFACE,
XXX
);
This patch is to add additional debug message if the installation
is failed and specific debug message for the case that the input
handle is invalid.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER in LocateProtocol for Protocol==NULL to
follow UEFI 2.7 spec
PiSmmCore is also updated as the EFI_SMM_SYSTEM_TABLE2.SmmLocateProtocol
is reusing the definition of EFI_LOCATE_PROTOCOL.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601
When installing configuration table and the original
gDxeCoreST->ConfigurationTable[] buffer happen to be not big enough to
add a new table, the CoreInstallConfigurationTable() enter the branch
of line 113 in InstallConfigurationTable.c to free the old
gDxeCoreST->ConfigurationTable[] buffer and allocate a new bigger one.
The problem happens at line 139 CoreFreePool(), which is to free the
old gDxeCoreST->ConfigurationTable[] buffer. The CoreFreePool()'s
behavior is to free the buffer firstly, then call the
InstallMemoryAttributesTableOnMemoryAllocation (PoolType) to update
the EfiRuntimeServices type memory info, the
CoreInstallConfigurationTable() will be re-entered by CoreFreePool()
in its calling stack, then use-after-free read error will happen at
line 59 of InstallConfigurationTable.c and use-after-free write error
will happen at line 151 and 152 of InstallConfigurationTable.c.
The patch is to update System table to the new table pointer before
calling CoreFreePool() to free the old table.
The case above is in DxeCore, but not in PiSmmCore.
The change in PiSmmCore is to be consistent with DxeCore.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Steven Shi <steven.shi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Shi <steven.shi@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568
Use fixed data type in data structure and make the structure
be natural aligned.
Without this update, the code must assume DXE and SMM are using
same data type (same size of UINTN), but it may be not true at
some case, for example, after standalone SMM feature is enabled.
With this update, the data structure will be phase independent
and convenient for consumer to parse the data.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569
The PdbStringOffset should be set to 0 for no PDB case,
then SmiHandlerProfileInfo can use it to know whether
there is PCD info or not.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=530
In DumpSmiChildContext() of SmiHandlerProfile.c and
SmiHandlerProfileInfo.c, the return buffer from
ConvertDevicePathToText() should be freed after used.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
SmramBase should be got from mLMFAConfigurationTable.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
This solution is equivalent to DXE core.
AllocatePool() allocates POOL_TAIL after the buffer.
This POOL_TAIL is checked at FreePool().
If the there is buffer overflow, the issue can be caught at FreePool().
This patch could also handle the eight-byte aligned allocation
requirement. The discussion related to the eight-byte aligned
allocation requirement is at
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2017-April/009995.html.
According to the PI spec (Vol 4, Section 3.2 SmmAllocatePool()):
The SmmAllocatePool() function ... All allocations are eight-byte aligned.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
For function SplitRecord() in file PropertiesTable.c, there is a
potential subtract underflow case for line:
return TotalNewRecordCount - 1;
However, such case will not happen since the logic in function
SplitTable() ensure that when calling SplitRecord(), the variable
'TotalNewRecordCount' will not be zero when performing the subtraction.
It will be handled in the previous if statement:
if (MaxSplitRecordCount == 0) {
CopyMem (NewRecord, OldRecord, DescriptorSize);
return 0;
}
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
This commit makes sure that in function CoreStartImage(), module
variable 'mCurrentImage' is restored to the current start image context
on all code paths.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442
PcdExpression used in INF to control PCD and Source is unsupported feature.
Current sample usage in module INF brings confuse.
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Issue reported at bugzillar 445.
Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
The EFI_IMAGE_MACHINE_TYPE_SUPPORTED() macro is abused in the PeiCore
code to decide whether the system we are compiling for can deal with
executable code being copied elsewhere and executed from there.
As stated in the comment, this is fundamentally a property of the compiler
target, and so this should be made dependent on MDE_CPU_xxx preprocessor
defines, and not on whether or not the runtime target can deal with
PE/COFF images of a certain machine type.
On X86/IA32, this mostly boils down to the same thing, but not on other
architectures, so let's clean this up.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Currently, the PE/COFF image memory protection code uses the same code
paths for protecting and unprotecting an image. This is strange, since
unprotecting an image involves a single call into the CPU arch protocol
to clear the permission attributes of the entire range, and there is no
need to parse the PE/COFF headers again.
So let's store the ImageRecord entries in a linked list, so we can find
it again at unprotect time, and simply clear the permissions.
Note that this fixes a DEBUG hang on an ASSERT() that occurs when the
PE/COFF image fails to load, which causes UnprotectUefiImage() to be
invoked before the image is fully loaded.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
UEFI executables that consist of a single read+write+exec PE/COFF section
trigger this message, but such a binary layout isn't actually an error.
The image can be launched alright, only image protection cannot be applied
to it fully.
One example that elicits the message is (some) Linux kernels (with the EFI
stub of course).
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
When attempting to perform page allocations using AllocateAddress, we
fail to check whether the entire region is free before splitting the
region. This may lead to memory being leaked further into the routine,
when it turns out that one of the memory map entries intersected by the
region is already occupied. In this case, prior conversions are not rolled
back.
For instance, starting from this situation
0x000040000000-0x00004007ffff [ConventionalMemory ]
0x000040080000-0x00004009ffff [Boot Data ]
0x0000400a0000-0x000047ffffff [ConventionalMemory ]
a failed EfiLoaderData allocation @ 0x40000000 that covers the BootData
region will fail, but leave the first part of the allocation converted,
so we end up with
0x000040000000-0x00004007ffff [Loader Data ]
0x000040080000-0x00004009ffff [Boot Data ]
0x0000400a0000-0x000047ffffff [ConventionalMemory ]
even though the AllocatePages() call returned an error.
So let's check beforehand that AllocateAddress allocations are covered
by a single memory map entry, so that it either succeeds or fails
completely, rather than leaking allocations.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370
Use GLOBAL_REMOVE_IF_UNREFERENCED for some memory profile global variables,
then their symbols could be removed when memory profile is disabled.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370
Use GLOBAL_REMOVE_IF_UNREFERENCED for some SMRAM profile global variables,
then their symbols could be removed when SMRAM profile is disabled.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
The reason is that we observe that a platform may use same Handler
for different context.
In order to support Unregister such handler, we have to input
context information as well.
Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Architectures such as AArch64 may run the OS with 16 KB or 64 KB sized
pages, and for this reason, the UEFI spec mandates a minimal allocation
granularity of 64 KB for regions that may require different memory
attributes at OS runtime.
So make PeiCore's implementation of AllocatePages () take this into
account as well.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Remove the local definitions for the default and runtime page allocation
granularity macros, and switch to the new MdePkg versions.
Note that this replaces a reference to the 'default' version with the
more correct 'runtime' version, but this matters little in practice.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Remove the local definitions for the default and runtime page allocation
granularity macros, and switch to the new MdePkg versions.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
There are cases that the operands of an expression are all with rank less
than UINT64/INT64 and the result of the expression is explicitly cast to
UINT64/INT64 to fit the target size.
An example will be:
UINT32 a,b;
// a and b can be any unsigned int type with rank less than UINT64, like
// UINT8, UINT16, etc.
UINT64 c;
c = (UINT64) (a + b);
Some static code checkers may warn that the expression result might
overflow within the rank of "int" (integer promotions) and the result is
then cast to a bigger size.
The commit refines codes by the following rules:
1). When the expression is possible to overflow the range of unsigned int/
int:
c = (UINT64)a + b;
2). When the expression will not overflow within the rank of "int", remove
the explicit type casts:
c = a + b;
3). When the expression will be cast to pointer of possible greater size:
UINT32 a,b;
VOID *c;
c = (VOID *)(UINTN)(a + b); --> c = (VOID *)((UINTN)a + b);
4). When one side of a comparison expression contains only operands with
rank less than UINT32:
UINT8 a;
UINT16 b;
UINTN c;
if ((UINTN)(a + b) > c) {...} --> if (((UINT32)a + b) > c) {...}
For rule 4), if we remove the 'UINTN' type cast like:
if (a + b > c) {...}
The VS compiler will complain with warning C4018 (signed/unsigned
mismatch, level 3 warning) due to promoting 'a + b' to type 'int'.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
This PCD holds the address mask for page table entries when memory
encryption is enabled on AMD processors supporting the Secure Encrypted
Virtualization (SEV) feature.
The mask is applied when creating page tables.
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Leo Duran <leo.duran@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
This implements a DXE memory protection policy that ensures that regions
that don't require executable permissions are mapped with the non-exec
attribute set.
First of all, it iterates over all entries in the UEFI memory map, and
removes executable permissions according to the configured DXE memory
protection policy, as recorded in PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy.
Secondly, it sets or clears the non-executable attribute when allocating
or freeing pages, both for page based or pool based allocations.
Note that this complements the image protection facility, which applies
strict permissions to BootServicesCode/RuntimeServicesCode regions when
the section alignment allows it. The memory protection configured by this
patch operates on non-code regions only.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
In preparation of adding memory permission attribute management to
the pool allocator, split off the locking of the pool metadata into
a separate lock. This is an improvement in itself, given that pool
allocations can only interfere with the page allocation bookkeeping
if pool pages are allocated or released. But it is also required to
ensure that the permission attribute management does not deadlock,
given that it may trigger page table splits leading to additional
page tables being allocated.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Star Zeng
Hao Wu
Amit Kumar
Jian J Wang
Ruiyu Ni
Shi, Steven
Liming Gao
Jiewen Yao
Ard Biesheuvel
Dandan Bi
Laszlo Ersek
Fu Siyuan
Leo Duran