Fix few typos in comments and documentation.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Coeur <coeur@gmx.fr>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200207010831.9046-67-philmd@redhat.com>
Fix various typos in documentation, comments and debug strings.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Coeur <coeur@gmx.fr>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200207010831.9046-66-philmd@redhat.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: replace EFI_D_xxx w/ DEBUG_xxx to shut up PatchCheck]
Fix various typos in comments and documentation.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Coeur <coeur@gmx.fr>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200207010831.9046-65-philmd@redhat.com>
Fix few typos in documentation, comments and debug strings.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Coeur <coeur@gmx.fr>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200207010831.9046-64-philmd@redhat.com>
Fix few typos in comments and documentation.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Coeur <coeur@gmx.fr>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200207010831.9046-63-philmd@redhat.com>
The DxeTpmMeasureBootHandler and DxeTpm2MeasureBootHandler handlers
are SECURITY2_FILE_AUTHENTICATION_HANDLER prototype. This prototype
can not return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER.
The prototype documentation states it returns EFI_ACCESS_DENIED if:
"The file specified by File and FileBuffer did not authenticate,
and the platform policy dictates that the DXE Foundation may not
use File."
Correct the documentation, and add a early check, returning
EFI_ACCESS_DENIED when File is NULL.
Noticed while reviewing commit 6d57592740.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2472
Replace the ASSERT with the error code return in the TpmPhysicalPresence
and GetTpmCapability.
Add missing error checking after call TpmPhysicalPresence in
TcgPhysicalPresenceLibProcessRequest.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
In DxeImageVerificationHandler(), we should return EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
for a rejected image only if the platform sets
DEFER_EXECUTE_ON_SECURITY_VIOLATION as the policy for the image's source.
Otherwise, EFI_ACCESS_DENIED must be returned.
Right now, EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION is returned for all rejected images,
which is wrong -- it causes LoadImage() to hold on to rejected images (in
untrusted state), for further platform actions. However, if a platform
already set DENY_EXECUTE_ON_SECURITY_VIOLATION, the platform will not
expect the rejected image to stick around in memory (regardless of its
untrusted state).
Therefore, adhere to the platform policy in the return value of the
DxeImageVerificationHandler() function.
Furthermore, according to "32.4.2 Image Execution Information Table" in
the UEFI v2.8 spec, and considering that edk2 only supports (AuditMode==0)
at the moment:
> When AuditMode==0, if the image's signature is not found in the
> authorized database, or is found in the forbidden database, the image
> will not be started and instead, information about it will be placed in
> this table.
we have to store an EFI_IMAGE_EXECUTION_INFO record in both the "defer"
case and the "deny" case. Thus, the AddImageExeInfo() call is not being
made conditional on (Policy == DEFER_EXECUTE_ON_SECURITY_VIOLATION); the
documentation is updated instead.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Fixes: 5db28a6753
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-12-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
It makes no sense to call AddImageExeInfo() with (Signature == NULL) and
(SignatureSize > 0). AddImageExeInfo() does not crash in such a case -- it
avoids the CopyMem() call --, but it creates an invalid
EFI_IMAGE_EXECUTION_INFO record. Namely, the
"EFI_IMAGE_EXECUTION_INFO.InfoSize" field includes "SignatureSize", but
the actual signature bytes are not filled in.
Document and ASSERT() this condition in AddImageExeInfo().
In DxeImageVerificationHandler(), zero out "SignatureListSize" if we set
"SignatureList" to NULL due to AllocateZeroPool() failure.
(Another approach could be to avoid calling AddImageExeInfo() completely,
in case AllocateZeroPool() fails. Unfortunately, the UEFI v2.8 spec does
not seem to state clearly whether a signature is mandatory in
EFI_IMAGE_EXECUTION_INFO, if the "Action" field is
EFI_IMAGE_EXECUTION_AUTH_SIG_FAILED or EFI_IMAGE_EXECUTION_AUTH_SIG_FOUND.
For now, the EFI_IMAGE_EXECUTION_INFO addition logic is not changed; we
only make sure that the record we add is not malformed.)
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-11-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
"FileBuffer" is a non-optional input (pointer) parameter to
DxeImageVerificationHandler(). Normally, when an edk2 function receives a
NULL argument for such a parameter, we return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER or
RETURN_INVALID_PARAMETER. However, those don't conform to the
SECURITY2_FILE_AUTHENTICATION_HANDLER prototype.
Return EFI_ACCESS_DENIED when "FileBuffer" is NULL; it means that no image
has been loaded.
This patch does not change the control flow in the function, it only
changes the "Status" outcome from API-incompatible error codes to
EFI_ACCESS_DENIED, under some circumstances.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Fixes: 570b3d1a72
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-10-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
The "Status" variable is set to EFI_ACCESS_DENIED at the top of the
function. Then it is overwritten with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION under the
"Failed" (earlier: "Done") label. We finally return "Status".
The above covers the complete usage of "Status" in
DxeImageVerificationHandler(). Remove the variable, and simply return
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION in the end.
This patch is a no-op, regarding behavior.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-9-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
Before the "Done" label at the end of DxeImageVerificationHandler(), we
now have a single access to "Status": we set "Status" to EFI_ACCESS_DENIED
at the top of the function. Therefore, the (Status != EFI_SUCCESS)
condition is always true under the "Done" label.
Accordingly, unnest the AddImageExeInfo() call dependent on that
condition, remove the condition, and also rename the "Done" label to
"Failed".
Functionally, this patch is a no-op. It's easier to review with:
git show -b -W
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-8-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: replace EFI_D_INFO w/ DEBUG_INFO for PatchCheck.py]
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
After the final "IsVerified" check, we set "Status" to EFI_ACCESS_DENIED.
This is superfluous, as "Status" already carries EFI_ACCESS_DENIED value
there, from the top of the function. Remove the assignment.
Functionally, this change is a no-op.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-7-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
A SECURITY2_FILE_AUTHENTICATION_HANDLER function is not expected to return
EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES. We should only return EFI_SUCCESS,
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION, or EFI_ACCESS_DENIED.
In case we run out of memory while preparing "SignatureList" for
AddImageExeInfo(), we should simply stick with the EFI_ACCESS_DENIED value
that is already in "Status" -- from just before the "Action" condition --,
and not suppress it with EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES.
This patch does not change the control flow in the function, it only
changes the "Status" outcome from API-incompatible error codes to
EFI_ACCESS_DENIED, under some circumstances.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Fixes: 570b3d1a72
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-6-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
Inside the "for" loop that scans the signatures of the image, we call
HashPeImageByType(), and assign its return value to "Status".
Beyond the immediate retval check, this assignment is useless (never
consumed). That's because a subsequent access to "Status" may only be one
of the following:
- the "Status" assignment when we call HashPeImageByType() in the next
iteration of the loop,
- the "Status = EFI_ACCESS_DENIED" assignment right after the final
"IsVerified" check.
To make it clear that the assignment is only useful for the immediate
HashPeImageByType() retval check, introduce a specific helper variable,
called "HashStatus".
This patch is a no-op, functionally.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-5-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
The PeCoffLoaderGetImageInfo() function may return various error codes,
such as RETURN_INVALID_PARAMETER and RETURN_UNSUPPORTED.
Such error values should not be assigned to our "Status" variable in the
DxeImageVerificationHandler() function, because "Status" generally stands
for the main exit value of the function. And
SECURITY2_FILE_AUTHENTICATION_HANDLER functions are expected to return one
of EFI_SUCCESS, EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION, and EFI_ACCESS_DENIED only.
Introduce the "PeCoffStatus" helper variable for keeping the return value
of PeCoffLoaderGetImageInfo() internal to the function. If
PeCoffLoaderGetImageInfo() fails, we'll jump to the "Done" label with
"Status" being EFI_ACCESS_DENIED, inherited from the top of the function.
Note that this is consistent with the subsequent PE/COFF Signature check,
where we jump to the "Done" label with "Status" having been re-set to
EFI_ACCESS_DENIED.
As a consequence, we can at once remove the
Status = EFI_ACCESS_DENIED;
assignment right after the "PeCoffStatus" check.
This patch does not change the control flow in the function, it only
changes the "Status" outcome from API-incompatible error codes to
EFI_ACCESS_DENIED, under some circumstances.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-4-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
In the code structure
if (condition) {
//
// block1
//
return;
} else {
//
// block2
//
}
nesting "block2" in an "else" branch is superfluous, and harms
readability. It can be transformed to:
if (condition) {
//
// block1
//
return;
}
//
// block2
//
with identical behavior, and improved readability (less nesting).
The same applies to "break" (instead of "return") in a loop body.
Perform these transformations on DxeImageVerificationHandler().
This patch is a no-op for behavior. Use
git show -b -W
for reviewing it more easily.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-3-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
In the DxeImageVerificationHandler() function, the "VerifyStatus" variable
can only contain one of two values: EFI_SUCCESS and EFI_ACCESS_DENIED.
Furthermore, the variable is only consumed with EFI_ERROR().
Therefore, using the EFI_STATUS type for the variable is unnecessary.
Worse, given the complex meanings of the function's return values, using
EFI_STATUS for "VerifyStatus" is actively confusing.
Rename the variable to "IsVerified", and make it a simple BOOLEAN.
This patch is a no-op, regarding behavior.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200116190705.18816-2-lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
[lersek@redhat.com: push with Mike's R-b due to Chinese New Year
Holiday: <https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/53429>; msgid
<d3fbb76dabed4e1987c512c328c82810@intel.com>]
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2439
Use EV_EFI_PLATFORM_FIRMWARE_BLOB2 if the TCG PFP revision is >= 105.
Use FvName as the description for the FV.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2439
The TCG2 DXE supports to parse the 800-155 event GUID from PEI
and puts to the beginning of the TCG2 event.
The TCG2 DXE also supports a DXE driver produces 800-155 event
and let TCG2 DXE driver record.
The 800-155 is a NO-ACTION event which does not need extend
anything to TPM2. The TCG2 DXE also supports that.
Multiple 800-155 events are supported. All of them will be put
to the beginning of the TCG2 event, just after the SpecId event.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2439
The PEIM can produce the 800-155 event and the event
will be recorded to TCG event log by the TCG2 DXE.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1940
According to TCG PFP specification: the ACPI table must be
measured prior to any modification, and the measurement
must be same cross every boot cycle.
There is a fix 3a63c17ebc
for the HID data. However that is not enough.
The LAML/LASA and PCD configuration change may also cause
similar problem.
We need measure the table before any update.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.Yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2315
Add YAML file to the package directory with the
configuration of the checks to perform during a
CI build.
Use BaseCryptLibNull for package CI builds to reduce package
build times. Enabled with CONTINUOUS_INTEGRATION in YAML
files. By default CONTINUOUS_INTEGRATION is not defined,
and the original lib mappings are preserved.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
We have discussed in this thread.
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/topic/32205028
Before the change, TPM FW upgrade will impact TPM2 ACPI PCR value because
TPM2 ACPI HID include FW version.
This change make the measurement before TPM2 HID fixup. So, after TPM FW
upgrade, the ACPI PCR record remains the same.
Signed-off-by: Derek Lin <derek.lin2@hpe.com>
Reviewed by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2327
RAID drivers abstract their physical drives that make up
the array into a single unit, and do not supply individual
EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL instances for each physical drive in the array.
This breaks support for the Security Storage Command Protocol,
which currently requires an EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL to be associated
with the same device the protocol is installed on and provide
all the same parameters.
This patch remove dependency on EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL and
allows access to Opal drive members of a RAID array.
Signed-off-by: Maggie Chu <maggie.chu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2265
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Update DEBUG() macro to use DEBUG_INFO to address PatchCheck.py error.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
commit a7e2d20193 introduces the code to
get PcdTpm2AcpiTableRev in the driver entry point. This PCD is designed as
DynamicHii or DynamicHiiEx PCD. So, this PCD depends on Variable service.
To make sure PcdTpm2AcpiTableRev value be got, add Variable service as Depex.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=978
Those PCDs will be used for TPM2 ACPI table.
Tcg2Dxe need produce those for event log address.
Tcg2Smm need consume those to fill TPM2 ACPI table.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
EfiCreateProtocolNotifyEvent() takes a (VOID**) for "Registration",
similarly to gBS->RegisterProtocolNotify(). We should pass the address of
an actual pointer-to-VOID, and not the address of an EFI_EVENT. EFI_EVENT
just happens to be specified as (VOID*), and has nothing to do with the
registration.
This change is a no-op in practice; it's a semantic improvement.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Unlike the InstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces() boot service, which takes
an (EFI_HANDLE*) as first parameter, the
UninstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces() boot service takes an EFI_HANDLE as
first parameter.
These are actual bugs. They must have remained hidden until now because
they are all in Unload() functions, which are probably exercised
infrequently. Fix the UninstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces() calls.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jian Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Common definitions are not consumed by VFR. They are not required to be
defined in Tcg2ConfigNvData.h with WA way. New shared internal header
file is added to include those common definitions.
Cc: Jian Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1781
GITHUB: https://github.com/idesai/edk2/tree/enable_sm3_measured_boot_v6
EDK2 Support for SM3 digest algorithm is needed to enable TPM with SM3 PCR
banks. This digest algorithm is part of the China Crypto algorithm suite.
This integration has dependency on the openssl_1_1_1b integration into
edk2.
This patch sets SM3 bit in TPM2.0 hash mask by default.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imran Desai <imran.desai@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190718225326.40839-4-imran.desai@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1781
GITHUB: https://github.com/idesai/edk2/tree/enable_sm3_measured_boot_v6
EDK2 Support for SM3 digest algorithm is needed to enable TPM with SM3 PCR
banks. This digest algorithm is part of the China Crypto algorithm suite.
This integration has dependency on the openssl_1_1_1b integration into
edk2.
This patch adds SM3 as an available digest algorithm to crypto router.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imran Desai <imran.desai@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190718225326.40839-3-imran.desai@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1781
GITHUB: https://github.com/idesai/edk2/tree/enable_sm3_measured_boot_v6
EDK2 Support for SM3 digest algorithm is needed to enable TPM with SM3 PCR
banks. This digest algorithm is part of the China Crypto algorithm suite.
This integration has dependency on the openssl_1_1_1b integration into
edk2.
This patch add SM3 algorithm in the hashinstance library.
Delta in v7:
1. Dropped 95a040cff from v6 to address https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/topic/
32454898?p=,,,20,0,0,0::Created,,sm3,20,2,0,32454898,ct=1&ct=1
2. Relocated SM3 GUID definition from MdePkg to SecurityPkg in 9728b54f4
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imran Desai <imran.desai@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190718225326.40839-2-imran.desai@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
This reverts commit 06dd5863b6.
The reason is that said commit directly depends on commit 49c1e683c4
("MdePkg/Protocol/Hash: introduce GUID for SM3", 2019-07-03), and the
latter commit is going to be reverted, due to its review process not
having followed established edk2 norms.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Imran Desai <imran.desai@intel.com>
Cc: Jian Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1781
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
This reverts commit 542d04e2a4.
The reason is that said commit indirectly depends on commit 49c1e683c4
("MdePkg/Protocol/Hash: introduce GUID for SM3", 2019-07-03), and the
latter commit is going to be reverted, due to its review process not
having followed established edk2 norms.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Imran Desai <imran.desai@intel.com>
Cc: Jian Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1781
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
This reverts commit d5af8fc5a9.
The reason is that said commit indirectly depends on commit 49c1e683c4
("MdePkg/Protocol/Hash: introduce GUID for SM3", 2019-07-03), and the
latter commit is going to be reverted, due to its review process not
having followed established edk2 norms.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Imran Desai <imran.desai@intel.com>
Cc: Jian Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1781
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1781
EDK2 Support for SM3 digest algorithm is needed to enable TPM with SM3 PCR
banks. This digest algorithm is part of the China Crypto algorithm suite.
This integration has dependency on the openssl_1_1_1b integration into
edk2.
This patch sets SM3 bit in TPM2.0 hash mask by default.
Signed-off-by: Imran Desai <imran.desai@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: jiewen.yao@intel.com
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1781
EDK2 Support for SM3 digest algorithm is needed to enable TPM with SM3 PCR
banks. This digest algorithm is part of the China Crypto algorithm suite.
This integration has dependency on the openssl_1_1_1b integration into
edk2.
This patch adds SM3 as an available digest algorithm to crypto router.
Signed-off-by: Imran Desai <imran.desai@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: jiewen.yao@intel.com
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1781
EDK2 Support for SM3 digest algorithm is needed to enable TPM with SM3 PCR
banks. This digest algorithm is part of the China Crypto algorithm suite.
This integration has dependency on the openssl_1_1_1b integration into
edk2.
This patch add SM3 algorithm in the hashinstance library.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imran Desai <imran.desai@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: jiewen.yao@intel.com
The current version will cause build fail because DxeDeferImageLoadLib
exists in DSC file but it was actually deleted. So it should be removed.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1919
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
The library DxeDeferImageLoadLib supports UID feature and it is conflicted
with the driver SecurityStubDxe (Defer3rdPartyImageLoad.c).
And the UID feature is dropped. So it should be removed from SecurityPkg.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1919
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1617
This driver implements a common checker, verifier and reporter which is
independent of hardware based root-of-trust.
Usually the hardware based root-of-trust will not verify all BIOS but
part of it. For example, Boot Guard will only verify IBB segment. The IBB
needs to verify other part of BIOS, i.e. other FVs to transfer control to
from IBB. This driver plays the role in IBB to verify FVs not covered by
hardware root-of-trust to make sure integrity of the chain of trust.
To be hardware/platform independent, PPI
gEdkiiPeiFirmwareVolumeInfoStoredHashFvPpiGuid
is introduced for platform to pass digest information to this driver.
This PPI should include all information needed to verify required FVs in
required boot mode.
struct _EDKII_PEI_FIRMWARE_VOLUME_INFO_STORED_HASH_FV_PPI {
FV_HASH_INFO HashInfo;
UINTN FvNumber;
HASHED_FV_INFO FvInfo[1];
};
To avoid TOCTOU issue, all FVs to be verified will be copied to memory
before hash calculation. That also means this driver has to be run after
permanent memory has been discovered.
For a measured boot, this driver will install
gEdkiiPeiFirmwareVolumeInfoPrehashedFvPpiGuid
to report digest of each FV to TCG driver.
For a verified boot, this driver will verify the final hash value
(calculated from the concatenation of each FV's hash) for indicated
FVs against the hash got from platform/hardware.
If pass, it will build EFI_HOB_TYPE_FV (consumed by DXE core) and/or
install gEfiPeiFirmwareVolumeInfoPpiGuid (consumed by PEI core), and
then report status code PcdStatusCodeFvVerificationPass.
If fail, it just report status code PcdStatusCodeFvVerificationFail
and go to dead loop if status report returns.
The platform can register customized handler to process pass and fail
cases differently.
Currently, this driver only supports hash (sha256/384/512) verification
for the performance consideration.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: "Hernandez Beltran, Jorge" <jorge.hernandez.beltran@intel.com>
Cc: Harry Han <harry.han@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Antoine Coeur
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Zhichao Gao
Laszlo Ersek
Jiewen Yao
Michael D Kinney
Derek Lin
Chu, Maggie
Sean Brogan
Liming Gao
Shenglei Zhang
Jian J Wang
Imran Desai