Remove OpalPasswordExtraInfoVariable.h as it is not been used
anymore.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Remove OpalPasswordSupportLib as it is not been used
anymore.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
After IOMMU is enabled in S3, original solution with SMM device
code (OpalPasswordSmm) to unlock OPAL device for S3 will not work
as the DMA operation will be aborted without granted DMA buffer.
Instead, this solution is to add OpalPasswordPei to eliminate
SMM device code, and OPAL setup UI produced by OpalPasswordDxe
will be updated to send requests (set password, update password,
and etc), and then the requests will be processed in next boot
before SmmReadyToLock, password and device info will be saved to
lock box used by OpalPasswordPei to unlock OPAL device for S3.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
With this flag, the LockBox can be restored in S3 resume only.
The LockBox can not be restored after SmmReadyToLock in normal boot
and after EndOfS3Resume in S3 resume.
It can not be set together with LOCK_BOX_ATTRIBUTE_RESTORE_IN_PLACE.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
if PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy is enabled for EfiReservedMemoryType
of memory, #PF will be triggered for each APs after ExitBootServices
in SCRT test. The root cause is that AP wakeup code executed at that
time is stored in memory of type EfiReservedMemoryType (referenced by
global mReservedApLoopFunc), which is marked as non-executable.
This patch fixes this issue by setting memory of mReservedApLoopFunc to
be executable immediately after allocation.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
The root cause is an unnecessary check to Size parameter in function
AdjustMemoryS(). It will cause one standalone free page (happen to have
Guard page around) in the free memory list cannot be allocated, even if
the requested memory size is less than a page.
//
// At least one more page needed for Guard page.
//
if (Size < (SizeRequested + EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE (1))) {
return 0;
}
The following code in the same function actually covers above check
implicitly. So the fix is simply removing above check.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Boolean values do not need to use explicit comparisons
to TRUE or FALSE.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by:Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Boolean values do not need to use explicit comparisons
to TRUE or FALSE.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
The example of UNION storage is not good, now update it.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
I recently added the gcc-8 specific "-Wno-stringop-truncation" and
"-Wno-restrict" options to BUILD_CFLAGS, both for "Darwin" (XCODE5 /
clang, OSX) and otherwise (gcc, Linux / Cygwin).
I also regression-tested the change with gcc-4.8 on Linux -- gcc-4.8 does
not know either of the (gcc-8 specific) "-Wno-stringop-truncation" and
"-Wno-restrict" options, yet the build completed fine (by GCC design).
Regarding OSX, my expectation was that
- XCODE5 / clang would either recognize these warnings options (because
clang does recognize most -W options of gcc),
- or, similarly to gcc, clang would simply ignore the "-Wno-xxx" flags
that it didn't recognize.
Neither is the case; the new flags have broken the BaseTools build on OSX.
Revert them (for OSX only).
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Reported-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Fixes: 1d212a83df
Fixes: 9222154ae7
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
The ZeroMem() call goes beyond the HashInterfaceHob structure, causing
HOB list corruption. Instead, just clear the HashInterface fields, as
I suppose was originally intended.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Marc-Andr? Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
If enabled, NX memory protection feature will mark some types of active
memory as NX (non-executable), which includes the first page of the stack.
This will overwrite the attributes of the first page of the stack if the
stack guard feature is also enabled.
The solution is to override the attributes setting to the first page of
the stack by adding back the 'EFI_MEMORY_RP' attribute when the stack
guard feature is enabled.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
The commit rewrites the logic in function
InitializeDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy() for handling the first page
(page 0) when NULL pointer detection feature is enabled.
Instead of skip setting the page 0, the codes will now override the
attribute setting of page 0 by adding the 'EFI_MEMORY_RP' attribute.
The purpose is to make it easy for other special handling of pages
(e.g. the first page of the stack when stack guard feature is enabled).
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Function BmRepairAllControllers may recursively call itself if some
driver health protocol returns EfiDriverHealthStatusReconnectRequired.
However, driver health protocol of some buggy third party driver may
always return such status even after one and another reconnect. The
endless iteration will cause stack overflow and then system exception,
and it may be not easy to find that the exception is actually caused
by stack overflow.
So we limit the number of reconnect retry to 10 to improve code
robustness, and DEBUG_CODE is moved ahead before recursive repair to
track the repair result.
We also remove a duplicated declaration of BmRepairAllControllers() in
InternalBm.h in this patch, for it is only a trivial change.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
CompatibleRangeTest() contains two bugs:
1. It doesn't reject the memory above 16MB
2. it cannot handle the case when the partial or whole range of
requested memory is already tested.
The patch fixes the two bugs.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The patch should not impact the functionality.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
The generic timer driver only EOIs the timer interrupt if
the ISTATUS bit is set. This is completely fine if you pretend
that spurious interrupts do not exist. But as a matter of fact,
they do, and the first one will leave the interrupt activated
at the GIC level, making sure that no other interrupt can make
it anymore.
Making sure that each interrupt Ack is paired with an EOI is the
way to go. Oh, and enabling the interrupt each time it is taken
is completely pointless. We entered this function for a good
reason...
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Add PcdVTdPeiDmaBufferSize(S3) to replace the hard coded value
TOTAL_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE and TOTAL_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE_S3 in IntelVTdPmrPei.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
NULL is returned to Mapping when Operation is BusMasterCommonBuffer or
BusMasterCommonBuffer64 in PeiIoMmuMap().
So Mapping == NULL is valid when calling PeiIoMmuUnmap().
940dbd071e wrongly changed EFI_SUCCESS
to EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER when Mapping == NULL in PeiIoMmuUnmap().
This patch is to correct it.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Based on the following patch from Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>:
[PATCH v2 1/2] OvmfPkg/AmdSevDxe: Clear the C-bit from SMM Saved State
http://mid.mail-archive.com/20180228161415.28723-2-brijesh.singh@amd.comhttps://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2018-February/022016.html
Original commit message from Brijesh:
> When OVMF is built with SMM, SMMSaved State area (SMM_DEFAULT_SMBASE +
> SMRAM_SAVE_STATE_MAP_OFFSET) contains data which need to be accessed by
> both guest and hypervisor. Since the data need to be accessed by both
> hence we must map the SMMSaved State area as unencrypted (i.e C-bit
> cleared).
>
> This patch clears the SavedStateArea address before SMBASE relocation.
> Currently, we do not clear the SavedStateArea address after SMBASE is
> relocated due to the following reasons:
>
> 1) Guest BIOS never access the relocated SavedStateArea.
>
> 2) The C-bit works on page-aligned address, but the SavedStateArea
> address is not a page-aligned. Theoretically, we could roundup the
> address and clear the C-bit of aligned address but looking carefully we
> found that some portion of the page contains code -- which will causes a
> bigger issue for the SEV guest. When SEV is enabled, all the code must
> be encrypted otherwise hardware will cause trap.
Changes by Laszlo:
- separate AmdSevDxe bits from SmmCpuFeaturesLib bits;
- spell out PcdLib dependency with #include and in LibraryClasses;
- replace (SMM_DEFAULT_SMBASE + SMRAM_SAVE_STATE_MAP_OFFSET) calculation
with call to new MemEncryptSevLocateInitialSmramSaveStateMapPages()
function;
- consequently, pass page-aligned BaseAddress to
MemEncryptSevClearPageEncMask();
- zero the pages before clearing the C-bit;
- pass Flush=TRUE to MemEncryptSevClearPageEncMask();
- harden the treatment of MemEncryptSevClearPageEncMask() failure.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Based on the following patch from Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>:
[PATCH v2 1/2] OvmfPkg/AmdSevDxe: Clear the C-bit from SMM Saved State
http://mid.mail-archive.com/20180228161415.28723-2-brijesh.singh@amd.comhttps://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2018-February/022016.html
Once PiSmmCpuDxeSmm relocates SMBASE for all VCPUs, the pages of the
initial SMRAM save state map can be re-encrypted (including zeroing them
out after setting the C-bit on them), and they can be released to DXE for
general use (undoing the allocation that we did in PlatformPei's
AmdSevInitialize() function).
The decryption of the same pages (which will occur chronologically
earlier) is implemented in the next patch; hence the "re-encryption" part
of this patch is currently a no-op. The series is structured like this in
order to be bisection-friendly. If the decryption patch preceded this
patch, then an info leak would be created while standing between the
patches.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
In the next two patches, we'll temporarily decrypt the pages containing
the initial SMRAM save state map, for SMBASE relocation. (Unlike the
separate, relocated SMRAM save state map of each VCPU, the original,
shared map behaves similarly to a "common buffer" between guest and host.)
The decryption will occur near the beginning of the DXE phase, in
AmdSevDxe, and the re-encryption will occur in PiSmmCpuDxeSmm, via OVMF's
SmmCpuFeaturesLib instance.
There is a non-trivial time gap between these two points, and the DXE
phase might use the pages overlapping the initial SMRAM save state map for
arbitrary purposes meanwhile. In order to prevent any information leak
towards the hypervisor, make sure the DXE phase puts nothing in those
pages until re-encryption is done.
Creating a memalloc HOB for the area in question is safe:
- the temporary SEC/PEI RAM (stack and heap) is based at
PcdOvmfSecPeiTempRamBase, which is above 8MB,
- the permanent PEI RAM (installed in PlatformPei's PublishPeiMemory()
function) never starts below PcdOvmfDxeMemFvBase, which is also above
8MB.
The allocated pages can be released to the DXE phase after SMBASE
relocation and re-encryption are complete.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
In the next three patches, we're going to modify three modules under
OvmfPkg. When OVMF is built with -D SMM_REQUIRE and runs in an SEV guest,
each affected module will have to know the page range that covers the
initial (pre-SMBASE relocation) SMRAM save state map. Add a helper
function to MemEncryptSevLib that calculates the "base address" and
"number of pages" constants for this page range.
(In a RELEASE build -- i.e., with assertions disabled and optimization
enabled --, the helper function can be compiled to store two constants
determined at compile time.)
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
List those and only those libraries that are used.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
There are many overlong lines; it's hard to work with the module like
this. Rewrap all files to 79 columns.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
In edk2, the "static" keyword is spelled "STATIC". Also let "STATIC" stand
alone on a line in function definitions.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
The declaration and the definition(s) of the function should have
identical leading comments and/or identical parameter lists. Document the
"Cr3BaseAddress" parameter, and correct several parameter references.
Replace a "clear" reference to the C-bit with a "set" reference.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
The declaration and the definition(s) of the function should have
identical leading comments and/or identical parameter lists. Document the
"Cr3BaseAddress" parameter, and correct several parameter references.
Replace a "set" reference to the C-bit with a "clear" reference.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
The declaration and the definition(s) of the function should have
identical leading comments and/or identical parameter lists. Replace any
leftover "clear" references to the C-bit with "set" references. Also
remove any excess space in the comment block, and unindent the trailing
"**/" if necessary. Correct several parameter references.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
The declaration and the definition(s) of the function should have
identical leading comments and/or identical parameter lists. Also remove
any excess space in the comment block, and unindent the trailing "**/" if
necessary. Correct several parameter references.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
The declaration and the definition(s) of the function should have
identical leading comments and/or identical parameter lists. Also remove
any excess space in the comment block, and unindent the trailing "**/" if
necessary.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
There are many overlong lines; it's hard to work with the library like
this. Rewrap all files to 79 columns.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Because terminal doesn't support shift and toggle key state,
ReadKeyStrokeEx just sets the two states to 0.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
gcc-8 (which is part of Fedora 28) enables the new warning
"-Wstringop-overflow" in "-Wall". This warning is documented in detail at
<https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html>; the
introduction says
> Warn for calls to string manipulation functions such as memcpy and
> strcpy that are determined to overflow the destination buffer.
It breaks the BaseTools build with:
> GenVtf.c: In function 'ConvertVersionInfo':
> GenVtf.c:132:7: error: 'strncpy' specified bound depends on the length
> of the source argument [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]
> strncpy (TemStr + 4 - Length, Str, Length);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> GenVtf.c:130:14: note: length computed here
> Length = strlen(Str);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~
It is a false positive because, while the bound equals the length of the
source argument, the destination pointer is moved back towards the
beginning of the destination buffer by the same amount (and this amount is
range-checked first, so we can't precede the start of the dest buffer).
Replace both strncpy() calls with memcpy().
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Reported-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
gcc-8 (which is part of Fedora 28) enables the new warning
"-Wrestrict" in "-Wall". This warning is documented in detail
at <https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html>; the
introduction says
> Warn when an object referenced by a restrict-qualified parameter (or, in
> C++, a __restrict-qualified parameter) is aliased by another argument,
> or when copies between such objects overlap.
It breaks the BaseTools build (in the Brotli compression library) with:
> In function 'ProcessCommandsInternal',
> inlined from 'ProcessCommands' at dec/decode.c:1828:10:
> dec/decode.c:1781:9: error: 'memcpy' accessing between 17 and 2147483631
> bytes at offsets 16 and 16 overlaps between 17 and 2147483631 bytes at
> offset 16 [-Werror=restrict]
> memcpy(copy_dst + 16, copy_src + 16, (size_t)(i - 16));
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In function 'ProcessCommandsInternal',
> inlined from 'SafeProcessCommands' at dec/decode.c:1833:10:
> dec/decode.c:1781:9: error: 'memcpy' accessing between 17 and 2147483631
> bytes at offsets 16 and 16 overlaps between 17 and 2147483631 bytes at
> offset 16 [-Werror=restrict]
> memcpy(copy_dst + 16, copy_src + 16, (size_t)(i - 16));
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> analyzed the Brotli source in detail,
and concluded that the warning is a false positive:
> This seems safe to me, because it's preceded by:
>
> uint8_t* copy_dst = &s->ringbuffer[pos];
> uint8_t* copy_src = &s->ringbuffer[src_start];
> int dst_end = pos + i;
> int src_end = src_start + i;
> if (src_end > pos && dst_end > src_start) {
> /* Regions intersect. */
> goto CommandPostWrapCopy;
> }
>
> If [src_start, src_start + i) and [pos, pos + i) don't intersect, then
> neither do [src_start + 16, src_start + i) and [pos + 16, pos + i).
>
> The if seems okay:
>
> (src_start + i > pos && pos + i > src_start)
>
> which can be rewritten to:
>
> (pos < src_start + i && src_start < pos + i)
>
> Then the numbers are in one of these two orders:
>
> pos <= src_start < pos + i <= src_start + i
> src_start <= pos < src_start + i <= pos + i
>
> These two would be allowed by the "if", but they can only happen if pos
> == src_start so they degenerate to the same two orders above:
>
> pos <= src_start < src_start + i <= pos + i
> src_start <= pos < pos + i <= src_start + i
>
> So it is a false positive in GCC.
Disable the warning for now.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Reported-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
gcc-8 (which is part of Fedora 28) enables the new warning
"-Wstringop-truncation" in "-Wall". This warning is documented in detail
at <https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html>; the
introduction says
> Warn for calls to bounded string manipulation functions such as strncat,
> strncpy, and stpncpy that may either truncate the copied string or leave
> the destination unchanged.
It breaks the BaseTools build with:
> EfiUtilityMsgs.c: In function 'PrintMessage':
> EfiUtilityMsgs.c:484:9: error: 'strncat' output may be truncated copying
> between 0 and 511 bytes from a string of length 511
> [-Werror=stringop-truncation]
> strncat (Line, Line2, MAX_LINE_LEN - strlen (Line) - 1);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> EfiUtilityMsgs.c:469:9: error: 'strncat' output may be truncated copying
> between 0 and 511 bytes from a string of length 511
> [-Werror=stringop-truncation]
> strncat (Line, Line2, MAX_LINE_LEN - strlen (Line) - 1);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> EfiUtilityMsgs.c:511:5: error: 'strncat' output may be truncated copying
> between 0 and 511 bytes from a string of length 511
> [-Werror=stringop-truncation]
> strncat (Line, Line2, MAX_LINE_LEN - strlen (Line) - 1);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The right way to fix the warning would be to implement string concat with
snprintf(). However, Microsoft does not appear to support snprintf()
before VS2015
<https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2915672/snprintf-and-visual-studio-2010>,
so we just have to shut up the warning. The strncat() calls flagged above
are valid BTW.
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Current BLOCK IO API code is using TPL_CALLBACK,
but comment is saying TPL_NOTIFY.
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Within function UpdateDisplayFromHistory():
When getting a character with different attribute with the current one,
the statement to compare the character with a 'NULL' char should be:
*StringSegmentEnd != CHAR_NULL
rather than:
StringSegmentEnd != CHAR_NULL
This commit resolves this typo.
Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Star Zeng
Jian J Wang
Dandan Bi
Laszlo Ersek
Marc-Andr? Lureau
Hao Wu
Ruiyu Ni
Heyi Guo
Marc Zyngier
Yonghong Zhu