REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1614
When we allocate pool to save the rebased PEIMs, the address will change
randomly, therefore the hash will change and result PCR0 change as well.
To avoid this, we save the raw PEIMs and use it to calculate hash.
The MigratedFvInfo HOB will never produce when
PcdMigrateTemporaryRamFirmwareVolumes is FALSE, because the PCD control
the total feature.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Debkumar De <debkumar.de@intel.com>
Cc: Harry Han <harry.han@intel.com>
Cc: Catharine West <catharine.west@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Guomin Jiang <guomin.jiang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1614
Introduces new changes to PeiCore to move the contents of temporary
RAM visible to the PeiCore to permanent memory. This expands on
pre-existing shadowing support in the PeiCore to perform the following
additional actions:
1. Migrate pointers in PPIs installed in PeiCore to the permanent
memory copy of PeiCore.
2. Copy all installed firmware volumes to permanent memory.
3. Relocate and fix up the PEIMs within the firmware volumes.
4. Convert all PPIs into the migrated firmware volume to the corresponding
PPI address in the permanent memory location.
This applies to PPIs and PEI notifications.
5. Convert all status code callbacks in the migrated firmware volume to
the corresponding address in the permanent memory location.
6. Update the FV HOB to the corresponding firmware volume in permanent
memory.
7. Use PcdMigrateTemporaryRamFirmwareVolumes to control if enable the
feature or not. when disable the PCD, the EvacuateTempRam() will
never be called.
The function control flow as below:
PeiCore()
DumpPpiList()
EvacuateTempRam()
ConvertPeiCorePpiPointers()
ConvertPpiPointersFv()
MigratePeimsInFv()
MigratePeim()
PeiGetPe32Data()
LoadAndRelocatePeCoffImageInPlace()
MigrateSecModulesInFv()
ConvertPpiPointersFv()
ConvertStatusCodeCallbacks()
ConvertFvHob()
RemoveFvHobsInTemporaryMemory()
DumpPpiList()
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Debkumar De <debkumar.de@intel.com>
Cc: Harry Han <harry.han@intel.com>
Cc: Catharine West <catharine.west@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
The MM communicate 2 protocol was introduced to factor out the mismatch
between traditional MM, which requires the physical address of the MM
buffer to be passed, and standalone MM, which copies the MM communicate
buffer data into a separate buffer, requiring the virtual address. For
this reason, MM communicate 2 carries both addresses, allowing the
implementation to decide which address it needs.
This hides this implementation detail from the callers of the protocol,
which simply passes both addresses without having to reason about what the
implementation of the protocol actually needs.
Note that the old version of the protocol is retained, in order to support
existing implementations that don't require this flexibility.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
The memory attributes table handling code shared some parts of the
properties table handling code when it was introduced. The latter has
been dropped, and so we can merge the remaining pieces into the former.
Link: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2633
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Bret Barkelew <bret.barkelew@microsoft.com>
Acked-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
This is the minimal change required to stop exposing the EFI properties
table, which is deprecated. Given how the implementation is entangled
with the code that exposes the related memory attributes table, most of
the code is retained, and further cleanups are relegated to subsequent
patches.
Link: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2633
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
Acked-by: Jiewen Yao <Jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
In the CoreStartImage() function [MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Image/Image.c], if
the image entry point returns a failure code, then the DXE Core logs a
helpful DEBUG_ERROR message, with the following format string:
"Error: Image at %11p start failed: %r\n"
Do similarly in the SMM Core (update the message slightly).
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1512
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200226221156.29589-2-lersek@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
EDK2's implementation of the LoadImage() boot service permits non-native
binaries to be loaded (i.e., X64 images on IA32 firmware), but any
attempts to start such an image using StartImage() will return
EFI_UNSUPPORTED.
The integration of the PE/COFF emulator protocol into the DXE core
deviates slightly from this paradigm, given that its IsImageSupported
hook as well as its RegisterImage hook are invoked from LoadImage,
and by the time StartImage is called, no opportunity is given to the
provider of the PE/COFF emulator protocol to prevent an image from
being started if it only supports loading it.
To address this disparity, let's move the invocation of RegisterImage()
to the implementation of the StartImage() boot service, allowing the
emulator to permit LoadImage() but reject StartImage() on images that
turn out not to meet the requirements of the emulator as it is being
started.
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2564
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1869
The UEFI spec requires that if any error occurs in
UninstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces(), EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER is returned
and not the return code of UninstallProtocolInterface().
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Fix various typos in comments and documentation.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Coeur <coeur@gmx.fr>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200207010831.9046-18-philmd@redhat.com>
Fix various typos in comments and documentation.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Coeur <coeur@gmx.fr>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200207010831.9046-17-philmd@redhat.com>
This patch clarifies wording in several PeiCore comments to improve
reading comprehension.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
To solve access issue reported by BZ1885, page 0 will be allocated to
avoid misuses if NULL pointer detection is enabled. It should be better
to be freed after EndOfDxe if BIT7 of PcdNullPointerDetectionPropertyMask
is set, because NULL pointer detection is no longer available after
EndOfDxe and there will be no access conflict.
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1885
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
When a boot loader examines the memory map, it can see that location 0
is available memory. If it chooses to use that memory, and
PcdNullPointerDetectionPropertyMask is enabled, use of memory in page 0
will cause an exception. This does occur when running the memtest86
program.
Leaving page 0 available is for legacy support purpose. Since we have
deprecated the support of legacy, the solution is just reserving it so
that it cannot be allocated for other uses.
Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1885
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
MapMemory is not initialized by FindGuardedMemoryMap
or CoreInternalAllocatePages which calls MapMemory.
So we give a 0 to it.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
An extra 's' slipped into the FvIsBeingProcessed function
name. Drop it to fix the typo.
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
An extra 's' slipped into the FvIsBeingProcessed function
name. Drop it to fix the typo.
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
The SmiHandlerRegister() function explicitly casts "SmiHandler" (of type
(SMI_HANDLER*)) to EFI_HANDLE, when outputting "DispatchHandle".
Apply the same cast in the counterpart function SmiHandlerUnRegister(),
which compares multiple "SmiHandler"s against the input "DispatchHandle".
This is a semantic cleanup; there is no functional change.
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Clean up two issues around FindFileEx():
- The "AprioriFile" parameter's type differs between the function
declaration and the function definition. The correct type is
(EFI_PEI_FILE_HANDLE*).
- "FfsFileHeader" has type (EFI_FFS_FILE_HEADER*); for clarity, we should
cast it explicitly to EFI_PEI_FILE_HANDLE when assigning it to
(*AprioriFile).
This is a semantic cleanup, there is no functional change.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
The PI spec (v1.7) correctly specifies "EFI_RUNTIME_EVENT_ENTRY.Event" in
natural language, but the field type in the structure definition itself is
wrong -- it should be EFI_EVENT, not (EFI_EVENT*).
This spec bug is likely unfixable for compatibility reasons, and so edk2
works it around already. We should clearly document the workaround.
Functionally, this patch is a no-op.
(I've also requested a non-normative (informative) clarification for the
PI spec: <https://mantis.uefi.org/mantis/view.php?id=2017>.)
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
The Fpdt driver (FirmwarePerformanceDxe) saves a memory address across
reboots, and then does an AllocatePage for that memory address.
If, on this boot, that memory comes from a Runtime memory bucket,
the MAT table is not updated. This causes Windows to boot into Recovery.
This patch blocks the memory manager from changing the page
from a special bucket to a different memory type. Once the buckets are
allocated, we freeze the memory ranges for the OS, and fragmenting
the special buckets will cause errors resuming from hibernate (S4).
The references to S4 here are the use case that fails. This
failure is root caused to an inconsistent behavior of the
core memory services themselves when type AllocateAddress is used.
The main issue is apparently with the UEFI memory map -- the UEFI memory
map reflects the pre-allocated bins, but the actual allocations at fixed
addresses may go out of sync with that. Everything else, such as:
- EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES_TABLE (page protections) being out of sync,
- S4 failing
are just symptoms / consequences.
This patch is cherry pick from Project Mu:
a9be767d9b
With the minor change,
1. Update commit message format to keep the message in 80 characters one line.
2. Remove // MU_CHANGE comments in source code.
3. Update comments style to follow edk2 style.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Initialize PageMapLevel5Entry at the beginning of the function.
This commit will fix a GCC 4.8.5 build failure introduced by commit
b3527dedc3.
OvmfPkg build failure wtih gcc 4.8.5 still exists at latest edk2 version.
The commit 46f8a68916 seems not to fix
the build failure completely.
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
This commit will fix a GCC 4.8.5 build failure introduced by commit
b3527dedc3.
PageMapLevel5Entry may be uninitialized in original code, which means
uninitialized pointer will be modified at some circumstance.
So relocate the operation of PageMapLevel5Entry++ in order to make sure
the pointer could be modified only when it is initialized.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2008
DxeIpl is responsible to create page table for DXE phase running
either in long mode or in 32bit mode with certain protection
mechanism enabled (refer to ToBuildPageTable()).
The patch updates DxeIpl to create 5-level page table for DXE phase
running in long mode when PcdUse5LevelPageTable is TRUE and CPU
supports 5-level page table.
Signed-off-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
RecoveryLib.h and PeiRecoveryLibNull have been deprecated from 2009,
so remove them.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1299
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
S3Lib.h and PeiS3LibNull have been deprecated since 2009, so remove them.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1299
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1948
Update the data structure signatures in the PiSmmCore
to be unique. Some of the signatures are the same as those
used by the DxeCore. For example, the memory pool head and
tail structures use the same signature in the PiSmmCore
and DxeCore. This means the use of the wrong FreePool API
will not be noticed at the time FreePool is called and a
failure can occur much later. By making the signatures
unique, misuse of an API is caught at that time the API is
called.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
REF: https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/
UEFI-Capsule-on-Disk-Introducation
If Capsule On Disk mode, call Capsule On Disk Load PPI to load
capsules. When it fails, still goes to Firmware Update boot path.
BDS will clear corresponding indicator and reboot later on.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Chao B Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao B Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1901
The original logic is ASSERT if fail to create HOB. But
that doesn't make sense for release version. So it is required
to set the Buffer to null to indicate the failure.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Cc: Michael Turner <Michael.Turner@microsoft.com>
Cc: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/UEFI-Capsule-
on-Disk-Introducation
If Capsule On Disk mode, call Capsule On Disk Load PPI to load
capsules. When it fails, still goes to Firmware Update boot path.
BDS will clear corresponding indicator and reboot later on.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Chao B Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao B Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1464
Currently Framework compatibility is not needed and
PcdFrameworkCompatibilitySupport will be removed from edk2.
So remove the usage of this PCD firstly.
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1460
Refer to Uefi spec 2.8, the ResetData is valid while ResetStatus
is EFI_SUCCESS regardless of the ResetType is EfiResetPlatformSpecific
or not.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Cc: Michael Turner <Michael.Turner@microsoft.com>
Cc: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
After commit 57df17fe26, some static check reports suspicious NULL pointer
deference at line:
Entry->MachineType = Entry->Emulator->MachineType;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
within function PeCoffEmuProtocolNotify().
However, 'Entry->Emulator' is guaranteed to have a non-NULL value when
previous call to the CoreHandleProtocol() returns EFI_SUCCESS.
This commit will re-write the return status check for CoreHandleProtocol()
to add explicit NULL pointer check for protocol instance pointer.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Now that the EBC machine type is no longer classified as a
natively supported machine type on the architectures that can
support it via the EBC interpreter, the EBC specific handling
in DXE core is no longer used and can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
When encountering PE/COFF images that cannot be supported natively,
attempt to locate an instance of the PE/COFF image emulator protocol,
and if it supports the image, proceed with loading it and register it
with the emulator.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1590
Use PcdAcpiS3Enable to control whether need to enable S3 related
functionality in Pi SMM Core.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=864
REF: CVE-2018-3630
To follow PI spec, ensure FfsFileHeader 8 bytes aligned.
For the integrity of FV(especially non-MemoryMapped FV) layout,
let CachedFv point to FV beginning, but not (FV + FV header).
And current code only handles (FwVolHeader->ExtHeaderOffset != 0) path,
update code to also handle (FwVolHeader->ExtHeaderOffset == 0) path.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1524
When shadowing PeiCore the EFI_PEI_CORE_FV_LOCATION_PPI
should be checked to see if PeiCore not in BFV, otherwise
just shadowing PeiCore from BFV.
Test: Verified on internal platform and booting successfully.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Take MAX_ALLOC_ADDRESS into account in the implementation of the
page allocation routines, so that they will only return memory
that is addressable by the CPU at boot time, even if more memory
is available in the GCD memory map.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Update the GCD memory map initialization code so it disregards
memory that is not addressable by the CPU at boot time. This
only affects the first memory descriptor that is added, other
memory descriptors are permitted that describe memory ranges
that may be accessible to the CPU itself only when executing
under the OS.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1405
Background as below.
Problem:
As static configuration from the PCDs, the binary PeiCore (for example
in FSP binary with dispatch mode) could not predict how many FVs,
Files or PPIs for different platforms.
Burden:
Platform developers need configure the PCDs accordingly for different
platforms.
To solve the problem and remove the burden, we can update code to
remove the using of PcdPeiCoreMaxFvSupported, PcdPeiCoreMaxPeimPerFv
and PcdPeiCoreMaxPpiSupported by extending buffer dynamically for FV,
File and PPI management.
This patch removes the using of PcdPeiCoreMaxPpiSupported in PeiCore.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1405
Background as below.
Problem:
As static configuration from the PCDs, the binary PeiCore (for example
in FSP binary with dispatch mode) could not predict how many FVs,
Files or PPIs for different platforms.
Burden:
Platform developers need configure the PCDs accordingly for different
platforms.
To solve the problem and remove the burden, we can update PeiCore to
remove the using of PcdPeiCoreMaxFvSupported, PcdPeiCoreMaxPeimPerFv
and PcdPeiCoreMaxPpiSupported by extending buffer dynamically for FV,
File and PPI management.
This patch removes the using of PcdPeiCoreMaxFvSupported in PeiCore.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1405
Background as below.
Problem:
As static configuration from the PCDs, the binary PeiCore (for example
in FSP binary with dispatch mode) could not predict how many FVs,
Files or PPIs for different platforms.
Burden:
Platform developers need configure the PCDs accordingly for different
platforms.
To solve the problem and remove the burden, we can update code to
remove the using of PcdPeiCoreMaxFvSupported, PcdPeiCoreMaxPeimPerFv
and PcdPeiCoreMaxPpiSupported by extending buffer dynamically for FV,
File and PPI management.
This patch removes the using of PcdPeiCoreMaxPeimPerFv in PeiCore.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1295
This issue originates from following patch which allows to enable
paging if PcdImageProtectionPolicy and PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy
(in addition to PcdSetNxForStack) are set to enable related features.
5267926134
Due to above change, PcdImageProtectionPolicy will be set to 0 by
default in many platforms, which, in turn, cause following code in
MdeModulePkg\Core\Dxe\Misc\MemoryProtection.c fail the creation of
notify event of CpuArchProtocol.
1138: if (mImageProtectionPolicy != 0 ||
PcdGet64 (PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy) != 0) {
1139: Status = CoreCreateEvent (
...
1142: MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify,
...
1145: );
Then following call flow won't be done and Guard pages will not be
set as not-present in SetAllGuardPages() eventually.
MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify()
=> HeapGuardCpuArchProtocolNotify()
=> SetAllGuardPages()
The solution is removing the if(...) statement so that the notify
event will always be created and registered. This won't cause
unnecessary code execution because, in the notify event handler,
the related PCDs like
PcdImageProtectionPolicy and
PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy
will be checked again before doing related jobs.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
At the end of of MemoryProtectionCpuArchProtocolNotify there's cleanup
code to free resource. But at line 978, 994, 1005 the function returns
directly. This patch use "goto" to replace "return" to make sure the
resource is freed before exit.
1029: CoreCloseEvent (Event);
1030: return;
There's another memory leak after calling gBS->LocateHandleBuffer() in
the same function:
Status = gBS->LocateHandleBuffer (
ByProtocol,
&gEfiLoadedImageProtocolGuid,
NULL,
&NoHandles,
&HandleBuffer
);
HandleBuffer is allocated in above call but never freed. This patch
will also add code to free it.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Guomin Jiang
Michael Kubacki
Oleksiy Yakovlev
Ard Biesheuvel
Abner Chang
Laszlo Ersek
Ard Biesheuvel
Heinrich Schuchardt
Antoine Coeur
Jian J Wang
Shenglei Zhang
Philippe Mathieu-Daude
Mike Turner
Ni, Ray
Michael D Kinney
Wei6 Xu
Bret Barkelew
Zhang, Chao B
Dandan Bi
Zhichao Gao
Hao Wu
Eric Dong
Star Zeng
Chasel, Chiu
Jian J Wang