This has not been the default for quite a while and required
setting an environment variable to revert back.
The tar implementation is more performant and addresses several
edge cases with the original `docker cp` version, so it's time
to fully retire it.
The scaffolding for multiple sync implementations remains to
support future experimentation here.
Signed-off-by: Milas Bowman <milas.bowman@docker.com>
- added clarity with error handling. added test to show issue.
- in manual testing, this fixes the issue and allows watch to run after rebuild
- added cleanup back in
- fixed issue where watch extnet rebuild test would start all containers listed in the fixture
Signed-off-by: kimdcottrell <me@kimdcottrell.com>
From the Go specification [1]:
"1. For a nil slice, the number of iterations is 0."
`len` returns 0 if the slice is nil [2]. Therefore, checking
`len(v) > 0` before a loop is unnecessary.
[1]: https://go.dev/ref/spec#For_range
[2]: https://pkg.go.dev/builtin#len
Signed-off-by: Eng Zer Jun <engzerjun@gmail.com>
The `alpha watch` command current "attaches" to an already-running
Compose project, so it's necessary to run something like
`docker compose up --wait` first.
Now, we'll do the equivalent of an `up --build` before starting the
watch, so that we know the project is up-to-date and running.
Additionally, unlike an interactive `up`, the services are not stopped
when `watch` exits (e.g. via `Ctrl-C`). This prevents the need to start
from scratch each time the command is run - if some services are already
running and up-to-date, they can be used as-is. A `down` can always be
used to destroy everything, and we can consider introducing a flag like
`--down-on-exit` to `watch` or changing the default.
Signed-off-by: Milas Bowman <milas.bowman@docker.com>
If running `up` in foreground mode (i.e. not `-d`),
when exiting via `Ctrl-C`, Compose stops all the
services it launched directly as part of that `up`
command.
In one of the E2E tests (`TestUpDependenciesNotStopped`),
this was occasionally flaking because the stop
behavior was racy: the return might not block on
the stop operation because it gets added to the
error group in a goroutine. As a result, it was
possible for no services to get terminated on exit.
There were a few other related pieces here that
I uncovered and tried to fix while stressing this.
For example, the printer could cause a deadlock if
an event was sent to it after it stopped.
Also, an error group wasn't really appropriate here;
each goroutine is a different operation for printing,
signal-handling, etc. If one part fails, we don't
actually want printing to stop, for example. This has
been switched to a `multierror.Group`, which has the
same API but coalesces errors instead of canceling a
context the moment the first one fails and returning
that single error.
Signed-off-by: Milas Bowman <milas.bowman@docker.com>
