Some were missing build '.' from their dicts, others were the
incorrect type and one I've moved from integration to unit.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
This is minimal disruptive change I could make to ensure
the service integration tests worked, now we have some validation
happening.
There is some coupling/entanglement/assumption going on here.
Project when creating a service, using it's class method from_dicts
performs some transformations on links, net & volume_from, which
get passed on to Service when creating. Service itself, then performs
some transformation on those values. This worked fine in the tests before
because those options were merely passed on via make_service_dict.
This is no longer true with our validation in place. You can't pass to
ServiceLoader [(obj, 'string')] for links, the validation expects it to be
a list of strings. Which it would be when passed into Project.from_dicts
method.
I think the tests need some re-factoring but for now, manually deleting
keys out of the kwargs and then putting them back in for Service Creation
allows the tests to continue.
I am not super happy about this approach. Hopefully we can come back and
improve it.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
We want to give feedback to the user as soon as possible about the
validity of the config supplied for the services.
When extending a service, we can validate that the fields are
correct against our schema but we must wait until the *end* of
the extends cycle once all of the extended dicts have been merged
into the service dict, to perform the final validation check on the
config to ensure it is a complete valid service.
Doing this before that had happened resulted in false reports of
invalid config, as common config when split out, by itself, is not
a valid service but *is* valid config to be included.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
This refactoring is now really coming together. Construction is
happening in the __init__, which is a constructor and helps
clean up the design and clarity of intent of the code. We can now
see (nearly) everything that is being constructed when a ServiceLoader
is created. It needs all of these data constructs to perform the
domain logic and actions. Which are now clearer to see and moving
more towards the principle of functions doing (mostly)one thing and
function names being more descriptive.
resolve_extends is now concerned with the resolving of extends, rather
than the construction, validation, pre processing and *then* resolving
of extends.
Happy days :)
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
Moving service name and dict out of the function make_service_dict
and into __init__. We always call make_service_dict with those so
let's put them in the initialiser. Slightly cleaner design intent.
The whole purpose of the ServiceLoader is to take a
service name&service dictionary then validate, process and return
service dictionaries ready to be created.
This is also another step towards cleaning the code up so we can
interpolate and validate an extended dictionary.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
While it can be set to ultimately a value of None, when a
config file is read in from stdin, it is not optional.
We kinda make use of it's ability to be set to None in our
tests but functionally and design wise, it is required.
If filename is not set, extends does not work.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
In particular it includes:
- some extension of CONTRIBUTING.md
- one fix for Python 2.6 in tests/integration/cli_test.py
- one fix for Python 3.3 in tests/integration/service_test.py
- removal of unused imports
Make stream_output Python 3-compatible
Signed-off-by: Frank Sachsenheim <funkyfuture@riseup.net>
If we get back an error that wasn't an APIError, it was causing the
thread to hang. This catch all, while I appreciate feels risky to
have a catch all, is better than not catching and silently failing,
with a never ending thread.
If something worse than an APIError has gone wrong, we want to stop
the incredible journey of what we're doing.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
In order to validate a service name that has been specified as an
integer we need to run that as a pre-process validation step
*before* we pass the config to be validated against the schema.
It is not possible to validate it *in* the schema, it causes a
type error. Even though a number is a valid service name, it
must be a cast as a string within the yaml to avoid type error.
Taken this opportunity to move the code design in a direction
towards:
1. pre-process
2. validate
3. construct
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
Aanand Prasad
Daniel Nephin
Daniel Nephin
Mazz Mosley
mnowster
Karol Duleba
funkyfuture
Joel Hansson