Some were missing build '.' from their dicts, others were the
incorrect type and one I've moved from integration to unit.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
We want to give feedback to the user as soon as possible about the
validity of the config supplied for the services.
When extending a service, we can validate that the fields are
correct against our schema but we must wait until the *end* of
the extends cycle once all of the extended dicts have been merged
into the service dict, to perform the final validation check on the
config to ensure it is a complete valid service.
Doing this before that had happened resulted in false reports of
invalid config, as common config when split out, by itself, is not
a valid service but *is* valid config to be included.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
This refactoring is now really coming together. Construction is
happening in the __init__, which is a constructor and helps
clean up the design and clarity of intent of the code. We can now
see (nearly) everything that is being constructed when a ServiceLoader
is created. It needs all of these data constructs to perform the
domain logic and actions. Which are now clearer to see and moving
more towards the principle of functions doing (mostly)one thing and
function names being more descriptive.
resolve_extends is now concerned with the resolving of extends, rather
than the construction, validation, pre processing and *then* resolving
of extends.
Happy days :)
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
Moving service name and dict out of the function make_service_dict
and into __init__. We always call make_service_dict with those so
let's put them in the initialiser. Slightly cleaner design intent.
The whole purpose of the ServiceLoader is to take a
service name&service dictionary then validate, process and return
service dictionaries ready to be created.
This is also another step towards cleaning the code up so we can
interpolate and validate an extended dictionary.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
While it can be set to ultimately a value of None, when a
config file is read in from stdin, it is not optional.
We kinda make use of it's ability to be set to None in our
tests but functionally and design wise, it is required.
If filename is not set, extends does not work.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
In particular it includes:
- some extension of CONTRIBUTING.md
- one fix for Python 2.6 in tests/integration/cli_test.py
- one fix for Python 3.3 in tests/integration/service_test.py
- removal of unused imports
Make stream_output Python 3-compatible
Signed-off-by: Frank Sachsenheim <funkyfuture@riseup.net>
In order to validate a service name that has been specified as an
integer we need to run that as a pre-process validation step
*before* we pass the config to be validated against the schema.
It is not possible to validate it *in* the schema, it causes a
type error. Even though a number is a valid service name, it
must be a cast as a string within the yaml to avoid type error.
Taken this opportunity to move the code design in a direction
towards:
1. pre-process
2. validate
3. construct
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
We use $ref in the schema to allow us to specify multiple type, eg
command, it can be a string or a list of strings.
It required some extra parsing to retrieve a helpful type to display
in our error message rather than 'string or string'. Which while
correct, is not helpful. We value helpful.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
When a schema type is set as unique, we should display the validation
error to indicate that non-unique values have been provided for a key.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
The validation message was confusing by displaying only 1 level of
property of the service, even if the error was another level down.
Eg. if the 'files' property of 'extends' was the incorrect format,
it was displaying 'an invalid value for 'extends'', rather than
correctly retrieving 'files'.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
Unfortunately the way that jsonschema is calling %r on its property
and then encoding the complete message means I've had to do this
manual way of removing the literal string prefix, u'.
eg:
key = 'extends'
message = "Invalid value for %r" % key
error.message = message.encode("utf-8")"
results in:
"Invalid value for u'extends'"
Performing a replace to strip out the extra "u'", does not change the
encoding of the string, it is at this point the character u followed
by a '.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
While it was intended as a positive to be stricter in validation
it would in fact break backwards compatibility, which we do not
want to be doing.
Consider re-visiting this later and include a deprecation warning if
we want to be stricter.
Signed-off-by: Mazz Mosley <mazz@houseofmnowster.com>
Mazz Mosley
Aanand Prasad
Daniel Nephin
mnowster
Karol Duleba
funkyfuture
Joel Hansson