This PR tries to finally fix the bug mentioned in #30011 and #15504,
where the user repo limit is checked when creating a repo in an
organization.
Fix#30011
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com>
Fix#28144
To make the resources will be cleanup once failed. All repository
operations now follow a consistent pattern:
- 1. Create a database record for the repository with the status
being_migrated.
- 2. Register a deferred cleanup function to delete the repository and
its related data if the operation fails.
- 3. Perform the actual Git and database operations step by step.
- 4. Upon successful completion, update the repository’s status to
ready.
The adopt operation is a special case — if it fails, the repository on
disk should not be deleted.
Extract from #33934
In the same goroutine, we should reuse the exist cat file sub process
which exist in `git.Repository` to avoid creating a unnecessary
temporary subprocess.
This PR reuse the exist cate file writer and reader in
`getCommitFromBatchReader`.
It also move `prepareLatestCommitInfo` before creating dataRc which will
hold the writer so other git operation will create a temporary cat file
subprocess.
Fix#32886
Add `last_committer_date` and `last_author_date` in the content API
which is not implemented by Github API v3 at the moment.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
1. Ignore empty inputs in `UnmarshalHandleDoubleEncode`
2. Ignore non-existing `stateEvent.User` in gitlab migration
3. Enable `release` and `wiki` units when they are selected in migration
4. Sanitize repo name for migration and new repo
Resolve#29328
This pull request introduces a file tree on the left side when reviewing
files of a repository.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Extract from #28966
This PR uses `gitrepo.IsRepositoryExist` instead of `util.IsExist` to
detect whether the repository exist in disk. This will move `RepoPath`
detail behind of package `gitrepo` to make it easier to do possible
changes where storing the repositories.
No code change
Fix#33490
It will only read the changed file on the pushed commits but not all the
files of this PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fix#33358, fix#21970
This adds a step in the `GitDiffForRender` that does syntax highlighting for the
entire file and then only references lines from that syntax highlighted
code. This allows things like multi-line comments to be syntax
highlighted correctly.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
The diff stats are no longer part of the diff generation.
Use `GetDiffShortStat` instead to get the total number of changed files,
added lines, and deleted lines.
As such, `gitdiff.GetDiff` can be simplified:
It should not do more than expected.
And do not run "git diff --shortstat" for pull list. Fix#31492
Replace all contexts in tests with go1.24 t.Context()
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Noticed a SQL in gitea.com has a bigger load. It seems both `is_pull`
and `pin_order` are not indexed columns in the database.
```SQL
SELECT `id`, `repo_id`, `index`, `poster_id`, `original_author`, `original_author_id`, `name`, `content`, `content_version`, `milestone_id`, `priority`, `is_closed`, `is_pull`, `num_comments`, `ref`, `pin_order`, `deadline_unix`, `created_unix`, `updated_unix`, `closed_unix`, `is_locked`, `time_estimate` FROM `issue` WHERE (repo_id =?) AND (is_pull = 0) AND (pin_order > 0) ORDER BY pin_order
```
I came across a comment
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24406#issuecomment-1527747296
from @delvh , which presents a more reasonable approach. Based on this,
this PR will migrate all issue and pull request pin data from the
`issue` table to the `issue_pin` table. This change benefits larger
Gitea instances by improving scalability and performance.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
- Both have `RejectTransfer` and `CancelTransfer` because the permission
checks are not the same. `CancelTransfer` can be done by the doer or
those who have admin permission to access this repository.
`RejectTransfer` can be done by the receiver user if it's an individual
or those who can create repositories if it's an organization.
- Some tests are wrong, this PR corrects them.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fix#33271
Suppose there is a `branch-a` in fork repo:
1. if `branch-a` exists in base repo: try to sync `base:branch-a` to `fork:branch-a`
2. if `branch-a` doesn't exist in base repo: try to sync `base:main` to `fork:branch-a`
Currently, anyone with write permissions to a repo are able to rename
default or protected branches.
This change follows
[GitHub's](https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-branches-in-your-repository/renaming-a-branch)
design by only allowing repo/site admins to change these branches.
However, it also follows are current design for protected branches and
only allows admins to modify branch names == branch protection rule
names. Glob-based rules cannot be renamed by anyone (as was already the
case, but we now catch `ErrBranchIsProtected` which we previously did
not catch, throwing a 500).
The `ctx.Repo.RefName` was used to be a "short name", it causes a lot of
ambiguity.
This PR does some refactoring and use `RefFullName` to replace the
legacy `RefName`, and simplify RepoAssignment
Resolve#32341
~Depends on #27151~
- [x] It will display a checkbox of deleting the head branch on the pull
request view page when starting an auto-merge task.
- [x] Add permission check before deleting the branch
- [x] Add delete branch comment for those closing pull requests because
of head branch or base branch was deleted.
- [x] Merge `RetargetChildrenOnMerge` and `AddDeletePRBranchComment`
into `service.DeleteBranch`.
close#33086
* Add a special value for "SSH_USER" setting: `(DOER_USERNAME)`
* Improve parseRepositoryURL and add tests (now it doesn't have hard
dependency on some setting values)
Many changes are just adding "ctx" and "doer" argument to functions.
By the way, improve app.example.ini, remove all `%(key)s` syntax, it
only makes messy and no user really cares about it.
Document: https://gitea.com/gitea/docs/pulls/138
In history (from some legacy frameworks), both `:name` and `name` are
supported as path path name, `:name` is an alias to `name`.
To make code consistent, now we should only use `name` but not `:name`.
Also added panic check in related functions to make sure the name won't
be abused in case some downstreams still use them.
