mirror of https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2.git
Revert "Properly set the next check time for active and passive checks"
This reverts commit 2a11b27972
.
This patch does not properly work and breaks the check_interval setting
for passive checks. Requires a proper patch.
refs #11248
refs #11257
refs #11273
(the old issue)
refs #7287
This commit is contained in:
parent
ce3062904f
commit
b8e3d61820
|
@ -156,4 +156,9 @@ void CheckResultReader::ProcessCheckResultFile(const String& path) const
|
|||
|
||||
Log(LogDebug, "CheckResultReader")
|
||||
<< "Processed checkresult file for object '" << checkable->GetName() << "'";
|
||||
|
||||
/* Reschedule the next check. The side effect of this is that for as long
|
||||
* as we receive check result files for a host/service we won't execute any
|
||||
* active checks. */
|
||||
checkable->SetNextCheck(Utility::GetTime() + checkable->GetCheckInterval());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -106,6 +106,11 @@ Dictionary::Ptr ApiActions::ProcessCheckResult(const ConfigObject::Ptr& object,
|
|||
cr->SetCommand(params->Get("check_command"));
|
||||
checkable->ProcessCheckResult(cr);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Reschedule the next check. The side effect of this is that for as long
|
||||
* as we receive passive results for a service we won't execute any
|
||||
* active checks. */
|
||||
checkable->SetNextCheck(Utility::GetTime() + checkable->GetCheckInterval());
|
||||
|
||||
return ApiActions::CreateResult(200, "Successfully processed check result for object '" + checkable->GetName() + "'.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -302,16 +302,8 @@ void Checkable::ProcessCheckResult(const CheckResult::Ptr& cr, const MessageOrig
|
|||
UpdateFlappingStatus(stateChange);
|
||||
is_flapping = IsFlapping();
|
||||
|
||||
/* update next check time for active and passive check results */
|
||||
if (!GetEnableActiveChecks() && GetEnablePassiveChecks()) {
|
||||
/* Reschedule the next passive check. The side effect of this is that for as long
|
||||
* as we receive passive results for a service we won't execute any
|
||||
* active checks. */
|
||||
SetNextCheck(Utility::GetTime() + GetCheckInterval());
|
||||
} else if (GetEnableActiveChecks()) {
|
||||
/* update next check time based on state changes and types */
|
||||
UpdateNextCheck();
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* update next check time on possible state changes */
|
||||
UpdateNextCheck();
|
||||
|
||||
olock.Unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -365,6 +365,11 @@ void ExternalCommandProcessor::ProcessHostCheckResult(double time, const std::ve
|
|||
<< "Processing passive check result for host '" << arguments[0] << "'";
|
||||
|
||||
host->ProcessCheckResult(result);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Reschedule the next check. The side effect of this is that for as long
|
||||
* as we receive passive results for a service we won't execute any
|
||||
* active checks. */
|
||||
host->SetNextCheck(Utility::GetTime() + host->GetCheckInterval());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void ExternalCommandProcessor::ProcessServiceCheckResult(double time, const std::vector<String>& arguments)
|
||||
|
@ -395,6 +400,11 @@ void ExternalCommandProcessor::ProcessServiceCheckResult(double time, const std:
|
|||
<< "Processing passive check result for service '" << arguments[1] << "'";
|
||||
|
||||
service->ProcessCheckResult(result);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Reschedule the next check. The side effect of this is that for as long
|
||||
* as we receive passive results for a service we won't execute any
|
||||
* active checks. */
|
||||
service->SetNextCheck(Utility::GetTime() + service->GetCheckInterval());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void ExternalCommandProcessor::ScheduleHostCheck(double, const std::vector<String>& arguments)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue