This fixes an issue where recovery notifications get lost if they happen
outside of a notification time period.
Not all calls to `Checkable::NotificationReasonApplies()` need
`GetStateBeforeSuppression()` to be checked. In fact, for one caller,
`FireSuppressedNotifications()` in
`lib/notification/notificationcomponent.cpp`, the state before suppression may
not even be initialized properly, so that the default value of OK is used which
can lead to incorrect return values. Note the difference between suppressions
happening on the level of the `Checkable` object level and the `Notification`
object level. Only the first sets the state before suppression in the
`Checkable` object, but so far, also the latter used that value incorrectly.
This commit moves the check of `GetStateBeforeSuppression()` from
`Checkable::NotificationReasonApplies()` to the one place where it's actually
relevant: `Checkable::FireSuppressedNotifications()`. This made the existing
call to `NotificationReasonApplies()` unneccessary as it would always return
true: the `type` argument is computed based on the current check result, so
there's no need to check it against the current check result.
error: no matching function for call to 'intrusive_ptr_release'
...
candidate function not viable: cannot convert argument of incomplete type 'icinga::Notification *' to 'Object *' for 1st argument
void intrusive_ptr_release(Object *object);
Currently, when processing a `CheckResult`, it will first trigger an
`OnNextCheckChanged` event, which is sent to all connected endpoints.
Then, when `Checkable::ProcessCheckResult()` returns, an `OnCheckResult`
event is fired, which is of course also sent to all connected endpoints.
Next, the other endpoints receive the `event::SetNextCheck` cluster
event followed by `event::CheckResult`and invoke
`checkable#SetNextCheck()` and `Checkable#CheckResult()` with the newly
received check. So they also try to recalculate the next check
themselves and invalidate the previously received next check timestamp
from the source endpoint. Since each endpoint randomly initialises its
own scheduling offset, the recalculated next check will always differ by
a split second/millisecond on each of them. As a consequence, two Icinga
DB HA instances will generate two different checksums for the same state
and causes the state histories to be fully resynchronised after a
takeover/Icinga 2 reload.
A day specification like "monday -1" refers to the last Monday of the month.
However, there was an off by one if the first day of the next month is the same
day of the week, i.e. a Monday in this example.
LegacyTimePeriod::FindNthWeekday() picks a day to start the search for the day
in question. When given a negative n to search for the n-th last day, it
wrongly used the first day of the following month as the start and counted it
as if it was within the current month. This resulted in a 1/7 chance that the
result was one week too late.
This is fixed by using the last day of the current month instead.
As MacroProcessor checked just for CustomVarObject base class, but
IcingaApplication provided the vars attribute by itself, it had to also
resolve CV macros by itself. That logic diverged from MacroProcessor so that
macros inside IcingaApplication CVs weren't resolved. Until now.
the last state change could be a long time ago. If it's longer than
the new downtime's duration, the downtime expires immediately.
trigger time + duration < now
The problem was that some PerfData labels contained several whitespace characters,
not just one, and therefore it was parsed incorrectly in `SplitPerfdata()`. I.e. the condition
in line 144 checks whether the first and last character is a normal quote, but since the
label can contain spaces at the beginning and at the end respectively, this caused the problems.
This PR fixes the problem by removing all occurring whitespace from the beginning and end,
before starting to parse the actual label.
Normally if for some reason an ack comment still exists on a checkable not
acked anymore, still clean it up. But while replaying log config objects
incl. ack comments come before check results and acks. I.e. 1) ack comment,
2) DOWN check result and 3) ack. Not 1) DOWN check result, 2) ack and 3) ack
comment. So the checkable is temporarily not acked, but already has the ack
comment. In this case the DOWN check result which is older than the ack
comment shall not clean up the latter.
Alexander Aleksandrovič Klimov
Julian Brost
Yonas Habteab
Mattia Codato
Yonas Habteab