1. The lookup of apply rules per source type now implies
no String(const char*) (no malloc()) and just pointer (uint64) comparisions
2. Apply rules are now also grouped by target type via a nested map, that obsoletes
checking the target type while iterating over all rules per source type
When committing an item with `ignore_on_error` flag set fails, the `Commit()` method only returns `nullptr`
and the current item is not being dropped from `m_Items`. `CommittNewItems()` also doesn't check the return
value of `Commit()` but just continues and tries to commit all items from `m_Items` in recursive call. Since
this corrupt item is never removed from `m_Items`, it ends up in an endless recursion till it finally crashes.
by caching the total minimum log severity of all loggers in a
"global variable" and whether a message's severity is large enough for any of
the loggers in a per-message no-op flag.
1. Don't set a custom handler for SIGCHLD (in the umbrella process)
as that handler doesn't actually handle SIGCHLD anymore
2. Don't reset the SIGCHLD handler (in the worker process)
as there's nothing to reset anymore due to the above change
3. Don't block SIGCHLD across fork(2) as its handler doesn't change anymore
due to the above changes
Before:
On SIGCHLD from the forked worker the umbrella process sets a failure flag.
StartUnixWorker() recognises that and does waitpid(), failure message, etc..
On OpenBSD we can't tell the signal source, so we always set the failure flag.
That's not how our IPC shall work, that breaks the IPC sooner or later.
After:
No SIGCHLD handling and no failure flag setting.
Instead StartUnixWorker()'s wait loop uses waitpid(x,y,WNOHANG)
to avoid false positives while watching the forked worker.
This ensures that `frame.Depth` is only decreased when preceding `frame.IncreaseStackDepth()` callee was successful.
This way, `frame.Depth` will have the same depth prior to and after evaluating a frame.
Before (time: vertical, stack: horizontal):
* Checkable::ExecuteCheck
* Checkable::UpdateNextCheck
* IcingaDB::NextCheckChangedHandler
* HSET icinga:host:state
* HSET icinga:checksum:host:state
* ZADD icinga:nextupdate:host
* RandomCheckTask::ScriptFunc
* Checkable::ProcessCheckResult
* Checkable::UpdateNextCheck
* IcingaDB::NextCheckChangedHandler
* HSET icinga:host:state
* HSET icinga:checksum:host:state
* ZADD icinga:nextupdate:host
* IcingaDB::NewCheckResultHandler
* HSET icinga:host:state
* HSET icinga:checksum:host:state
* ZADD icinga:nextupdate:host
* IcingaDB::StateChangeHandler
* XADD icinga:runtime:state
* IcingaDB::ForwardHistoryEntries
* XADD icinga:history:stream:state
After:
* Checkable::ExecuteCheck
* Checkable::UpdateNextCheck
* RandomCheckTask::ScriptFunc
* Checkable::ProcessCheckResult
* Checkable::UpdateNextCheck
* IcingaDB::NewCheckResultHandler
* HSET icinga:host:state
* HSET icinga:checksum:host:state
* ZADD icinga:nextupdate:host
* IcingaDB::StateChangeHandler
* XADD icinga:runtime:state
* IcingaDB::ForwardHistoryEntries
* XADD icinga:history:stream:state
The first state + nextupdate (for overdue) update comes from next_check being
set to now + interval immediately before doing the actual check (not to trigger
it twice). This update is not only not important for the end user, but even
inappropriate. The end user SHALL see next_check being e.g. in -4s, not 5m, as
the check is running at the moment.
The second one is just redundant as IcingaDB::NewCheckResultHandler (the third
one) is called anyway and will update state + nextupdate as well.
Julian Brost
Alexander A. Klimov
Yonas Habteab