This was mistakenly introduced with PR #7686 due to too many open
connections (#7680). This was wrong in the sense that closing the
connection is simply out of place here and should have been handled
differently. After we revised the RPC connection disconnect procedure
with `v2.14.4`, it becomes clear why it is wrong, because the connection
is closed abruptly before the corresponding response (`result`) has
even been written. Now if you remove the disconnect here, shouldn't the
issue #7680 occur again, you ask? The answer is no, because we now also
have a maximum timeout of `10s` for anonymous connections, after which
they are automatically closed. Thanks to the introduction of this
timeout by @julianbrost in #8479, this `Disconnect()` call has become
superfluous.
c026f03ee2