2017-01-18 14:35:36 +01:00
|
|
|
<a id="Fields-example-SNMP"></a>Data Fields example: SNMP
|
2017-01-17 13:37:10 +01:00
|
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ever wondered how to provide an easy to use SNMP configuration to your users?
|
|
|
|
That's what we're going to show in this example. Once completed, all your Hosts
|
|
|
|
inheriting a specific (or your "default") Host Template will provide an optional
|
|
|
|
`SNMP version` field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In case you choose no version, nothing special will happen. Otherwise, the host
|
|
|
|
offers additional fields depending on the chosen version. `Community String` for
|
|
|
|
`SNMPv1` and `SNMPv2c`, and five other fields ranging from `Authentication User`
|
|
|
|
to `Auth` and `Priv` types and keys for `SNMPv3`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your services should now be applied not only based on various Host properties
|
|
|
|
like `Device Type`, `Application`, `Customer` or similar - but also based on
|
|
|
|
the fact whether credentials have been given or not.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-18 12:45:36 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-17 13:37:10 +01:00
|
|
|
Prepare required Data Fields
|
|
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As we already have learned, `Fields` are what allows us to define which custom
|
|
|
|
variables can or should be defined following which rules. We want SNMP version
|
|
|
|
to be a drop-down, and that's why we first define a `Data List`, followed by
|
|
|
|
a `Data Field` using that list:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Create a new Data List
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0117a/0117a2c04e83a95200ec7d160f8e0ac010c1aa8b" alt="Create a new Data List"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Fill the new list with SNMP versions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9913/a9913a0181c3343d7f6c9f6f4cece5062a437003" alt="Fill the new list with SNMP versions"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Create a corresponding Data Field
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9de5/f9de57350e1f073fa0dbca774620323268a0db63" alt="Create a Data Field for SNMP Versions"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Next, please also create the following elements:
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-18 12:45:36 +01:00
|
|
|
* a list *SNMPv3 Auth Types* providing `MD5` and `SHA`
|
2017-01-17 13:37:10 +01:00
|
|
|
* a list *SNMPv3 Priv Types* providing at least `AES` and `DES`
|
|
|
|
* a `String` type field `snmp_community` labelled *SNMP Community*
|
|
|
|
* a `String` type field `snmpv3_user` labelled *SNMPv3 User*
|
|
|
|
* a `String` type field `snmpv3_auth` labelled *SNMPv3 Auth* (authentication key)
|
|
|
|
* a `String` type field `snmpv3_priv` labelled *SNMPv3 Priv* (encryption key)
|
|
|
|
* a `Data List` type field `snmpv3_authprot` labelled *SNMPv3 Auth Type*
|
|
|
|
* a `Data List` type field `snmpv3_privprot` labelled *SNMPv3 Priv Type*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please do not forget to add meaningful descriptions, telling your users about
|
|
|
|
in-house best practices.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-18 12:45:36 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assign your shiny new Fields to a Template
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm using my default Host Template for this, but one might also choose to provide
|
|
|
|
`SNMP version` on Network Devices. Should Network Device be a template? Or just
|
|
|
|
an option in a `Device Type` field? You see, the possibilities are endless here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This screenshot shows part of my assigned Fields:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5137e/5137e2c7a2000ccc203a711a7b2fcc05a94a8ab0" alt="SNMP Fields on Default Host"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While I kept `SNMP Version` optional, all other fields are mandatory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use your Template
|
|
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As soon as you choose your template, a new field is shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fef1d/fef1d571d305d9939b55f02a6e7b1010ff8aace3" alt="Choose SNMP version"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In case you change it to `SNMPv2c`, a `Community String` will be required:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fa9d/2fa9d69d8e78ad4cdeb18de69884c802c8eabd0f" alt="Community String for SNMPv2c"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Switch it to SNMPv3 to see completely different fields:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41703/4170391e7c04430d5064c638c447add6fc048961" alt="Auth and Priv properties for SNMPv3"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once stored please check the rendered configuration. Switch the SNMP versions
|
|
|
|
forth and back, and you should see that filtered fields will also remove the
|
|
|
|
corresponding values from the object.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assign Services based on those properties
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You should design your Commands to use that set of properties. Change the example
|
|
|
|
slightly to fit ITL Commands in case you're using those (snmpv3_*_type VS _alg).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your Cisco Health checks assigned to all:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* routers or switches
|
|
|
|
* manifactured by Cisco
|
|
|
|
* with SNMP credentials, regardless of which version
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...might then look as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c51d2/c51d2d84fcd2cad57b043f30bce1ac4754a830eb" alt="Assign SNMP-based checks"
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-18 14:35:36 +01:00
|
|
|
Have fun!
|