From a59026e88934e2a65848b5cdf2ce140b04cfb0bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Olivier Lacan Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:59:50 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typos and remove errors --- source/en/1.0.0/index.html.haml | 11 +++-------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/source/en/1.0.0/index.html.haml b/source/en/1.0.0/index.html.haml index 05ad279..5536999 100644 --- a/source/en/1.0.0/index.html.haml +++ b/source/en/1.0.0/index.html.haml @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ version: 1.0.0 %p This project aims to be = link_to "a better changelog convention.", changelog - It's comes from observing good practices in the open source + It comes from observing good practices in the open source community and gathering them. %p @@ -295,10 +295,6 @@ version: 1.0.0 %p This document is not the truth; it’s my carefully considered opinion, along with information and examples I gathered. - Although I provide an actual #{link_to "CHANGELOG", changelog} on - #{link_to "the GitHub repo", gh}, I have purposefully not created a - proper release or clear list of rules to follow (as - #{link_to "SemVer.org", semver} does, for instance). %p This is because I want our community to reach a consensus. I believe @@ -311,6 +307,5 @@ version: 1.0.0 %h3 Conversations %p I went on #{link_to "The Changelog podcast", thechangelog} - about why maintainers and contributors should care, and the - motivations behind this project. If you can spare the time (1:06), - it’s a good listen. + to talk about why maintainers and contributors should care about changelogs, + and also about the motivations behind this project.