keep-a-changelog/index.html
Olivier Lacan 970338d437 Add "Why should I care?" section and mention The Changelog.
I figured adding this section was notable enough to make a new
CHANGELOG entry as well.

The podcast is a bit long so I don't expect people new to this project
to actually listen to it right away but it would be good to extract
some of the good points made on the show into more fuel to the fire.
2014-08-09 20:22:13 +09:00

118 lines
6.8 KiB
HTML
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<html>
<head>
<title>Keep a Changelog</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="assets/stylesheets/normalize.css" media="screen" charset="utf-8">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="assets/stylesheets/style.css" media="screen" charset="utf-8">
<script type="text/javascript" src="//use.typekit.net/tng8liq.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">try{Typekit.load();}catch(e){}</script>
</head>
<body>
<article>
<h1>Keep a CHANGELOG</h1>
<h2>Dont let your friends dump git logs into CHANGELOGs&trade;</h2>
<h3>What&#39;s a CHANGELOG?</h3>
<p>A CHANGELOG is a file which contains a curated chronologically ordered
list of notable changes for each version of an open source project.</p>
<p><a href="CHANGELOG.md"><img src="assets/images/changelog_example.png" alt="Changelog Example"></a></p>
<h3>What&#39;s the point of a CHANGELOG?</h3>
<p>To make it easier for users and contributors to see precisely what
notable changes have been made between each release (or version) of the project.</p>
<h3>Why should I care?</h3>
<p>Well, because software tools are for people. If you don&#39;t care, why are
you contributing to open source? There must be a kernel (ha) of care
somewhere in that lovely little brain of yours.</p>
<p>I <a href="http://5by5.tv/changelog/127">talked with Adam Stacoviak and Jerod Santo on The Changelog</a>
(fitting, right?) podcast about why open source maintainers and
contributors should care, and the motivations behind this project. If
you can spare the time (1:06), it&#39;s a good listen.</p>
<h3>What makes up a good CHANGELOG?</h3>
<p>I&#39;m glad you asked.</p>
<ul>
<li>It&#39;s made for humans, not machines, so legibility is crucial.</li>
<li>One sub-section per versions.</li>
<li>Versions should come with a release date in a sensible format: YYYY-MM-DD.</li>
<li>Changes should be grouped to describe their impact on the project:
<ul>
<li><code>Added</code> for new features.</li>
<li><code>Deprecated</code> for once stable features removed in upcoming releases.</li>
<li><code>Removed</code> for deprecated features removed in this release.</li>
<li><code>Fixed</code> for any bug fixes.</li>
<li><code>Security</code> to invite users to upgrade in case of vulnerabilities.</li>
</ul></li>
<li>Each section should be easily linked to — hence Markdown over plain text.</li>
<li>Write release dates in an international, sensible, and
language-independent format: <code>2012-06-02</code> for <code>June 2nd, 2012</code>.</li>
<li>Order the releases reverse chronologically (latest at the top).</li>
</ul>
<p>It&#39;s also good to mention whether the project
follows <a href="http://semver.org/">Semantic Versioning</a>.</p>
<h3>What makes unicorns cry?</h3>
<p>Alright, let&#39;s get into it:</p>
<ul>
<li>Dumping a diff of commit logs. Just don&#39;t do that, you&#39;re helping nobody.</li>
<li>Not emphasizing deprecations: when people upgrade from one version to
another it should be painfully clear when something will break.</li>
<li>Dates in regionally-specific formats. Americans put the month first
(&quot;06-02-2012&quot; for June 2nd, 2012, which makes <em>no</em> sense), while Brits
use a robotic-looking &quot;June 2 2012&quot;, yet pronounce it &quot;June 2nd, 2012&quot;.</li>
</ul>
<p>There&#39;s more. Help me collect those unicorn tears by
<a href="https://github.com/olivierlacan/keep-a-changelog/issues/new">opening an issue</a>
or a pull request.</p>
<h3>Is there a standard CHANGELOG format?</h3>
<p>Sadly, no, but this is something I want to change. This project
<a href="CHANGELOG.md">contains what I hope will become the standard CHANGELOG file</a>
for all open source projects, so take a look at it and please suggest improvements.</p>
<h3>What should the CHANGELOG file be named?</h3>
<p>Well, if you can&#39;t tell from the example above, <code>CHANGELOG.md</code> is the
best convention so far.</p>
<p>Some projects also use <code>HISTORY.txt</code>, <code>HISTORY.md</code>, <code>History.md</code>, <code>NEWS.txt</code>,
<code>NEWS.md</code>, <code>News.txt</code>, <code>RELEASES.txt</code>, <code>RELEASE.md</code>, <code>releases.md</code>, etc.
It&#39;s a mess, that only makes it harder for people to find it.</p>
<h3>Why can&#39;t people just use a git log diff?</h3>
<p>Because log diffs are full of noise. Can we really expect every single
commit in an open source project to be meaningful and self-explanatory?
That seems like a pipe dream.</p>
<h3>Can CHANGELOG files be automatically parsed?</h3>
<p>It&#39;s hard because people follow wildly different formats and file names.
<a href="https://github.com/tech-angels/vandamme/">Vandamme</a> is a Ruby gem
created by the <a href="http://gemnasium.com">Gemnasium</a> team and which parses
many (but not all) open source project CHANGELOGs.</p>
<h3>Why do you keep writing CHANGELOG in all caps?</h3>
<p>You&#39;re right, that is a bit shouty. Maybe it&#39;s because of the de facto
convention that files pertaining to an open source project should be in
all caps, for instance: <a href="README.md"><code>README</code></a>, <a href="LICENSE"><code>LICENSE</code></a>,
<a href="CONTRIBUTING.md"><code>CONTRIBUTING</code></a>.</p>
<p>It denotes that these files are metadata for the project, similarly to
<a href="http://shields.io/">open source project badges</a> they draw attention to
themselves as information people should be aware of if they mean to use
the project or contribute to it.</p>
<h3>How can I contribute?</h3>
<p>This document is not the <strong>truth</strong>, it&#39;s my carefully considered
opinion with the information and examples I was able to gather. Although
I provide an actual <a href="CHANGELOG.md">CHANGELOG</a> on <a href="https://github.com/olivierlacan/keep-a-changelog">the GitHub repo</a>,
I have purposefully not created a proper <em>release</em> or clear list of rules
to follow like <a href="http://semver.org/">SemVer.org</a> does for instance. This is
because I want our community to reach a consensus. I believe the discussion
is as important as the end result. So please <a href="https://github.com/olivierlacan/keep-a-changelog/issues"><strong>pitch in</strong></a>.</p>
<footer class="clearfix">
<p class="license">This project is <a href="http://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/">MIT Licensed</a>.</p>
<p class="about"><a href="https://github.com/olivierlacan/keep-a-changelog/">Typed</a> with trepidation by <a href="http://olivierlacan.com">Olivier Lacan</a> from <a href="http://codeschool.com">Code School</a>.</p>
</footer>
</article>
<script type="text/javascript">
var _gauges = _gauges || [];
(function() {
var t = document.createElement('script');
t.type = 'text/javascript';
t.async = true;
t.id = 'gauges-tracker';
t.setAttribute('data-site-id', '5389808eeddd5b055a00440d');
t.src = '//secure.gaug.es/track.js';
var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t, s);
})();
</script>
</body>
</html>