Update utimensat test.

POSIX specifies that when given a symlink, AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW should
update the symlink and not the destination.  The compat code doesn't
have a way to do this, so where possible it fails instead of following a
symlink when explicitly asked not to. Instead of checking for an explicit
failure, check that it does not update the destination, which both the
real and compat implmentations should honour.

Inspired by github pull req #125 from chutzpah at gentoo.org.
This commit is contained in:
Darren Tucker 2019-06-07 23:47:37 +10:00
parent d220b67520
commit 182898192d
1 changed files with 17 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -83,14 +83,28 @@ main(void)
fail("mtim.tv_nsec", 45678000, sb.st_mtim.tv_nsec);
#endif
/*
* POSIX specifies that when given a symlink, AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW
* should update the symlink and not the destination. The compat
* code doesn't have a way to do this, so where possible it fails
* with ENOSYS instead of following a symlink when explicitly asked
* not to. Here we just test that it does not update the destination.
*/
if (rename(TMPFILE, TMPFILE2) == -1)
fail("rename", 0, 0);
if (symlink(TMPFILE2, TMPFILE) == -1)
fail("symlink", 0, 0);
ts[0].tv_sec = 11223344;
ts[1].tv_sec = 55667788;
(void)utimensat(AT_FDCWD, TMPFILE, ts, AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW);
if (stat(TMPFILE2, &sb) == -1)
fail("stat", 0, 0 );
if (sb.st_atime == 11223344)
fail("utimensat symlink st_atime", 0, 0 );
if (sb.st_mtime == 55667788)
fail("utimensat symlink st_mtime", 0, 0 );
if (utimensat(AT_FDCWD, TMPFILE, ts, AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) != -1)
fail("utimensat followed symlink", 0, 0);
/* Clean up */
if (!(unlink(TMPFILE) == 0 && unlink(TMPFILE2) == 0))
fail("unlink", 0, 0);
exit(0);