Test if sshd accidentally acquires controlling tty
When SSHD_ACQUIRES_CTTY is defined, test for the problematic behaviour in the STREAMS code before activating the workaround. ok djm@
This commit is contained in:
parent
766176cfdb
commit
df93529dd7
|
@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
|
|||
#include <unistd.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include "misc.h"
|
||||
#include "log.h"
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef O_NOCTTY
|
||||
#define O_NOCTTY 0
|
||||
|
@ -73,8 +74,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
#if defined(HAVE_DEV_PTMX) && !defined(HAVE__GETPTY)
|
||||
static int
|
||||
openpty_streams(int *amaster, int *aslave, char *name, struct termios *termp,
|
||||
struct winsize *winp)
|
||||
openpty_streams(int *amaster, int *aslave)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This code is used e.g. on Solaris 2.x. (Note that Solaris 2.3
|
||||
|
@ -162,14 +162,21 @@ openpty(int *amaster, int *aslave, char *name, struct termios *termp,
|
|||
* different session and is available to become controlling terminal
|
||||
* for the client's subprocess. See bugzilla #245 for details.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int r, fd;
|
||||
static int junk_ptyfd = -1, junk_ttyfd;
|
||||
|
||||
if (junk_ptyfd == -1)
|
||||
(void)openpty_streams(&junk_ptyfd, &junk_ttyfd, NULL, NULL,
|
||||
NULL);
|
||||
r = openpty_streams(amaster, aslave);
|
||||
if (junk_ptyfd == -1 && (fd = open(_PATH_TTY, O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY)) >= 0) {
|
||||
close(fd);
|
||||
junk_ptyfd = *amaster;
|
||||
junk_ttyfd = *aslave;
|
||||
debug("STREAMS bug workaround pty %d tty %d name %s",
|
||||
junk_ptyfd, junk_ttyfd, ttyname(junk_ttyfd));
|
||||
} else
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
return openpty_streams(amaster, aslave, name, termp, winp);
|
||||
return openpty_streams(amaster, aslave);
|
||||
|
||||
#elif defined(HAVE_DEV_PTS_AND_PTC)
|
||||
/* AIX-style pty code. */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue