tyler.durden/test262
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/tc39/test262.git synced 2025-07-26 15:34:29 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Correct typos

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Mike Pennisi 2023-01-15 21:37:33 -05:00 committed by Philip Chimento
parent ac098dbe6a
commit 62df2cadef
1 changed files with 7 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

15
docs/rationale.md
View File

@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ For instance:
Since existing tests do not necessarily reflect the project's current Since existing tests do not necessarily reflect the project's current
best-practices, it's especially important for test authors to familiarize best-practices, it's especially important for test authors to familiarize
themselves with [the contribution guidelines](CONTRIBUTING.md). themselves with [the contribution guidelines](../CONTRIBUTING.md).
## Test generation ## Test generation
@ -55,9 +55,8 @@ file organization can help.
Tests for syntax-derived operations are organized according to the language Tests for syntax-derived operations are organized according to the language
grammar, with directories used to describe non-terminals. For example, tests grammar, with directories used to describe non-terminals. For example, tests
for example, tests for [the `if` for [the `if` statement](https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-if-statement) are located
statement](https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-if-statement) are located in [the in [the `tests/language/statements/if`
`tests/language/statements/if`
directory](https://github.com/tc39/test262/tree/main/test/language/statements/if), directory](https://github.com/tc39/test262/tree/main/test/language/statements/if),
and tests for [the `instanceof` and tests for [the `instanceof`
operator](https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-relational-operators) are located in operator](https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-relational-operators) are located in
@ -141,10 +140,10 @@ to learn.
## Syntax tests ## Syntax tests
When testing a syntactic feature of the language, it can be tempting to write When testing a syntactic feature of the language, it can be tempting to write
tests which verify that some bit of source text does *not* produce a syntax tests which verify only that some bit of source text does *not* produce a
error. Contributors should try to push beyond verifying only the lack of a syntax error. Contributors should try to push beyond verifying only the lack of
syntax error because such tests also have observable semantics. It's better for a syntax error because such tests also have observable semantics. It's better
a test to assert that the expected semantics are followed. for a test to assert that the expected semantics are followed.
However, verifying semantics invariably requires inserting still more code, and However, verifying semantics invariably requires inserting still more code, and
that additional code may degrade the tests' precision for verifying syntax. For that additional code may degrade the tests' precision for verifying syntax. For