tyler.durden
/
test262
mirror of https://github.com/tc39/test262.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update the location of `2nd-param-non-object.js`

This commit is contained in:
Emmanuel Ferdman 2024-04-14 01:49:16 +03:00 committed by Philip Chimento
parent 263c514afa
commit 79e9b39f3a
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
rfcs/async-helpers.md
View File

@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ f();
Tests written like this will correctly pass if the import Promise is rejected, and will correctly fail if the import succeeds (due to the imported module object being passed to `$DONE`.)
However, at a first glance, it's not immediately clear that the test is correct in the case of the import succeeding; in fact in an earlier draft of this RFC I thought the test was incorrect.
Others, such as [`test/language/expressions/dynamic-import/2nd-param-non-object.js`](https://github.com/tc39/test262/blob/main/test/language/expressions/dynamic-import/2nd-param-non-object.js), use a pattern more like what is proposed in this RFC. However, this pattern doesn't format the messages as helpfully in all the edge cases that `assert.throws()` does, such as:
Others, such as [`test/language/expressions/dynamic-import/import-assertions/2nd-param-non-object.js`](https://github.com/tc39/test262/blob/main/test/language/expressions/dynamic-import/import-assertions/2nd-param-non-object.js), use a pattern more like what is proposed in this RFC. However, this pattern doesn't format the messages as helpfully in all the edge cases that `assert.throws()` does, such as:
- the Promise being rejected with a primitive value;
- the error constructor being a different object with the same name, such as a different iframe's TypeError;