tyler.durden/test262
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/tc39/test262.git synced 2025-09-25 19:18:48 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update a setter function source text test

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
André Bargull 2025-04-30 14:16:18 +02:00 committed by Philip Chimento
parent a08fdc081c
commit 7b1eabb793
1 changed files with 6 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
test/staging/sm/extensions/string-literal-getter-setter-decompilation.js
View File

@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ description: |
pending
esid: pending
---*/
var f;
try
{
@ -29,14 +30,12 @@ assert.sameValue(fstr.indexOf("set") < fstr.indexOf("c d e"), true,
assert.sameValue(fstr.indexOf("setter") < 0, true, "using old-style syntax?");
var o = f();
var ostr = "" + o;
assert.sameValue("c d e" in o, true, "missing the property?");
assert.sameValue("set" in Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(o, "c d e"), true,
"'c d e' property not a setter?");
// disabled because we still generate old-style syntax here (toSource
// decompilation is as yet unfixed)
// assert.sameValue(ostr.indexOf("set") < ostr.indexOf("c d e"), true,
// "should be using new-style syntax when getting the source of a " +
// "getter/setter while decompiling an object");
// assert.sameValue(ostr.indexOf("setter") < 0, true, "using old-style syntax?");
var ostr = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(o, "c d e").set + o;
assert.sameValue(ostr.indexOf("set") < ostr.indexOf("c d e"), true,
"should be using new-style syntax when getting the source of a " +
"getter/setter while decompiling an object" + ostr);
assert.sameValue(ostr.indexOf("setter") < 0, true, "using old-style syntax?");