tyler.durden/test262
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/tc39/test262.git synced 2025-07-19 03:54:36 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Apply suggestions from code review

Browse Source 
Co-authored-by: Jordan Harband <ljharb@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Philip Chimento <philip.chimento@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Ms2ger 2023-01-10 13:51:07 +01:00 committed by Philip Chimento
parent 97477ad1f6
commit ac098dbe6a
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
docs/rationale.md
View File

@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ examples of tests which contradict the preferred patterns.
For instance: For instance:
- tests which expression expectations with `throw` statements inside of - tests which express expectations with `throw` statements inside of
conditional statements rather than the assertion API implemented by the conditional statements rather than the assertion API implemented by the
harness files (though this explicitness will always be desirable when harness files (though this explicitness will always be desirable when
asserting the semantics of conditional statements and `throw` statements asserting the semantics of conditional statements and `throw` statements
@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ would not necessarily accept such a test.
## Large tests ## Large tests
Test262 tests are typically very focused. The vast majority exercise just one Test262 tests are typically very focused. The vast majority exercise just one
algorithm step/grammar production, and some are even more granular that that! algorithm step/grammar production, and some are even more granular than that!
Some test contributors are uncomfortable splitting their work across files like Some test contributors are uncomfortable splitting their work across files like
this. It's certainly unlike the practices that are common in modern application this. It's certainly unlike the practices that are common in modern application