intl: increase coverage for NumberFormat constructor

Increase coverage for the Intl.NumberFormat class contructor by adding
tests for checking that it calls ToObject on the options argument.
This commit is contained in:
Ujjwal Sharma 2018-09-28 14:56:07 +05:30 committed by Rick Waldron
parent 24386286f1
commit bb7585bdaf
1 changed files with 32 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
// Copyright (C) 2018 Ujjwal Sharma. All rights reserved.
// This code is governed by the BSD license found in the LICENSE file.
/*---
esid: sec-initializenumberformat
description: >
Tests that Intl.NumberFormat contructor converts the options argument
to an object using `ToObject` (7.1.13).
info: |
11.1.2 InitializeNumberFormat
3.a. Let options be ? ToObject(options).
---*/
const toObjectResults = [
[true, new Boolean(true)],
[42, new Number(42)],
['foo', new String('foo')]
];
// Test if ToObject is used to convert primitives to Objects.
toObjectResults.forEach(pair => {
const [value, result] = pair;
assert.sameValue(
new Intl.NumberFormat(['en-US'], value).resolvedOptions(),
new Intl.NumberFormat(['en-US'], result).resolvedOptions()
);
});
// ToObject throws a TypeError for undefined and null, but it's not called
// when options is undefined.
assert.throws(TypeError, () => new Intl.NumberFormat(['en-US'], null));