Fixes gh-696
As pointed in gh-696, the ArrayBuffer ctor won't throw a RangeError when
invoked without arguments.
Instead of fixing the invalid assertion, this commit removes it as the
coverage for subclassing is already satisfied by the use of slice.
* Add missing test for early error
* Add missing test for WithBaseObject
* Improve coverage for `new.target`
* Add test for deletion of SuperReference
* Add tests for `in` keyword restrictions
* fixup! Improve coverage for `new.target`
The global isNaN is not precise at all, and Number.isNaN is an ES6 feature that makes it preferrable to use assert's sameValue for NaN values, as it handles it internally using the comparison.
This test was intended to assert the semantics of the `for-in`
statement, but it was mistakenly authored to use a `for-of` statement.
Update the statement under test, and improve the testing methodology to
correctly assert the creation of distinct bindings.
Ensure that early errors restricting labelled function declarations
within WithStatement and IfStatement are honored. Rename existing tests
to match the specification's spelling.
* Improve test coverage for `super` keyword
Add tests for SuperCall and SuperProperty, organized together in the
`test/language/expressions/super/` directory. For SuperProperty, include
tests for usage from within Object initializers and class bodies because
a different set of semantics are observable from each context.
The prior version of this test asserted only the property's
configurability. It was also limited to the RegExp object as returned
from the RegExp constructor.
Extend the test to verify all values of the property descriptor.
Duplicate these assertions in a separate file dedicated to the RegExp
object as created from a RegExp literal.
The specification contains an explicit informative NOTE explaining that
the 'm' flag does not effect the behavior of the '^' assertion. Add a
test to verify this.
ES2015 reads:
> RegExpUnicodeEscapeSequence :: u{ HexDigits }
>
> - It is a Syntax Error if the MV of HexDigits > 1114111.
Use the MV 0x110000 to assert the lower boundary of values which are
expected to produce the SyntaxError.
A subtle aspect of the for-of iteration protocol concerns abrupt
completions that do *not* trigger iterator closing. Although this detail
is implicit in the current structure of the specification text, some
hosts may violate the protocol by closing the iterator because later
steps *do* specify that behavior.
The V8 engine is one such host--as of this writing, it incorrectly
closes the iterator when accessing the `value` property of the iterator
result produces an abrupt completion.
Add tests verifying that the iterator protocol is not violated in this
way for abrupt completions during the semantics of for-of evaluation.
These tests have been re-factored to expand coverage of the "default
parameter" language feature and to more closely adhere to this project's
preferred file organization.
Ensure that when HasBinding of an Object environment record returns an
abrupt completion, that same completion is returned to the runtime.
Update the meta-data of related tests for consistency with this new
test.
The latest revision of ECMA262 makes special provisions for classes
which extend the `null` value [1]. Update the relevant tests
accordingly.
[1] https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/543
Utilize the test generation tool to increase coverage of destructuring
assignment semantics. Previously, only destructuring assignment in the
AssignmentExpression position was tested. With this change applied, the
same tests will assert expected behavior for destructuring assignment in
`for..of` statements, as well.
A limited number of tests are applied to the `for..in` statement as
well, but due to the iteration protocol observed by that statement, many
destructuring tests are not relevant, and others cannot be automatically
generated from this format.
This change set does not include a test for restrictions relating to
template literals because such a test already exists in the project.
While a form of this test for string literals in strict mode code
existed previously, it is less precise and relies on unrelated
semantics. Remove the previous form and replace with a more direct
version.
