- Re-organize existing tests for identifiers
Name files according to their content (not their ES5 ID). Move tests
for IdentifierName and LabelIdentifier to more appropriate directories.
- Simplify and correct tests
Instead of asserting successful runtime evaluation using `eval`, rely
on the test runner's ability to detect syntax errors. Update the test
bodies to test the grammar referenced by their ES5 ID and
description--the IdentifierStart pattern.
- Use `negative` frontmatter to assert SyntaxErrors
- Remove redundant tests
- Use `assert.equal` helper function
- Add equivalent tests for literal unicode chars
- Add tests for variable-length unicode escape
The `test/language/generators/` directory contained a single file that
concerned generators derived both from syntactic form and from a
built-in function.
Refactor this test into two files and place each in the appropriate
directory.
Some tests involving the directive prologue are invalidated by source
text transformations that insert executable code in the beginning of the
script. Implement a `raw` flag that allows these tests to opt-out of
this transformation. Update the relevant tests to use this flag (and
remove references to globals only available when code is injected).
Update the Python runner accordingly:
- Do not run tests marked as "raw" in strict mode
- Reject invalid test configurations
Update the browser runner accordingly:
- Do not modify the script body of tests marked as "raw"
In ECMAScript 5, assignment to a non-reference value throws a runtime
ReferenceError. ECMAscript 6 specifies an early ReferenceError in these
cases. Tests for this behavior have been authored to pass in both cases.
Simplify these tests to describe and assert the early error.
The `fnExists` function defines a generic way to determine if any number
of values are function instances. Because it is only used by a single
test, the additional complexity required by the generalized code (and
the organizational drawbacks to maintaining another "include" file) are
not justified. Remove the file and update the test to assert the
function's existence directly.
Some tests specifically concern the application of the `use strict`
directive as it appears in JavaScript source code. These tests should
*not* be run with the `onlyStrict` flag because relying on the test
runner to enable strict mode makes the semantics of the source code
irrelevant. Update these tests to use the `noStrict` flag.
Other tests concern language semantics that are only valid in strict
mode, but the mechanism for enabling strictness is inconseqential.
Update these tests to use the `onlyStrict` flag and remove any redundant
`use strict` directive prologues contained within.
Still other tests are valid both within and outside of strict mode.
In keeping with the majority of other tests, do not specify any
restrictions on the environments in which these tests may be run.
The `$PRINT` helper function has no effect on test behavior. The
following tests use it to report assertion outcomes (and as a result
will fail silently):
- test/language/function-code/S10.2.1_A4_T2.js
- test/language/function-code/S10.2.1_A5.1_T1.js
- test/language/function-code/S10.2.1_A5.1_T2.js
- test/language/function-code/S10.2.1_A5.2_T1.js
Remove the function definition and all references within tests. Update
tests that use it as an error reporting mechanism to instead use an
appropriate `assert` helper function.
In neglecting to assert the type of error thrown (or that any error was
thrown at all), these tests cannot fail. Refactor the tests to use the
`assert.throws` helper method, which takes these details into
consideration.
This function is equivalent to `$ERROR` (which is automatically included
in test environments). Remove the harness file that defines the
function, remove references to the file from test `includes` lists, and
update scripts to instead invoke the `$ERROR` function.
The previous description of the 11.4.1-4.a-5 test case implied that an environment object could not be deleted while inside a with. However, the actual test was to test whether the variable declaration could be deleted. The description has been updated to better reflect this.
Test 11.4.1-4.a-5 states that it verifies that an environment object cannot be deleted. However, this was giving a false positive. It was actually testing where a "var" declaration on an environment object cannot be deleted (there are other tests for this). This test case fails on Chrome 43, Firefox 38 and Internet Explorer 11.
