ECMA262 allows for an arbitrary number of "ScriptJob"s to run in a given realm.
Although there is no standard mechanism for enqueuing these jobs, many
implementations offer this functionality through custom APIs. In those hosts,
the semantics describing script interactions are directly observable.
In order to guarantee conformance to the specification in advance of a
standardized API, Test262 now requires that hosts provide a $.evalScript
function whose behavior is defined in the project's "INTERPRETING.md" file.
Use this host-provided API to ensure that implementations correctly observe the
specification text that dictates script interactions.
(In writing these tests, I noticed some gaps in coverage that are observable
from a single script execution. This patch includes a dedicated commit for
these tests that do not require $.evalScript.)
* Improve coverage of GlobalDeclarationInstantiation
* Add tests for script interactions
Use the host-provied `$.evalScript` method to assert conformance to the
specification text that defines script interactions.
* fixup! Improve coverage of GlobalDeclarationInstantiation
* Add tests for early errors in functions
* Improve tests for class accessors
Use the `propertyHelper.js` utility in order to functionally test the
property descriptors of class methods.
* Remove redundant tests
The semantics of an IdentifierReference as a PropertyDefinition within
an object initializer are exhaustively tested by the files in this
directory whose name match the pattern `prop-def-id-*.js`.
Delete the redundant tests in favor of the more descriptively-named and
more exhaustive alternatives.
* Rename tests
* Update test names to be more descriptive
* Add tests for property descriptors of accessors
* Add tests for runtime error during method dfn
* Add test for observable iteration
* Extend tests for class "name" inference
Ensure that when a class defines a static "name" method, that method
definition prevents the "name" inference behavior.
* Re-generate tests
This is a pure miscellaneous change to use global values of NaN and Infinity instead of their namespaced equivalents.
Ref 9ae0567a50 (r69049894)
cc @suwc
This re-factors some existing Sputnik tests to be more targeted and to use a
pattern that can be generalized to other forms. We could test these all day,
but I've limited myself to forms introduced in ES2015, specifically
YieldExpression and new.target. Note that SpiderMonkey incorrectly throws a
SyntaxError for these.
I thoughtlessly wrote ReferenceError tests for yield = 1 until I realized
that such productions are not actually recognized by the grammar, so the early
errors do not apply. Instead, I've added a negative syntax test for that case.
* Refactor test for valid cover
* Add tests for ValidSimpleAssignmentTarget
Ensure that constructs introduced in ES2015 are disallowed as assignment
targets, with or without a "cover" grammar.
* Add test for grammar precedence of YieldExpression
Fixes gh-696
As pointed in gh-696, the ArrayBuffer ctor won't throw a RangeError when
invoked without arguments.
Instead of fixing the invalid assertion, this commit removes it as the
coverage for subclassing is already satisfied by the use of slice.
* Add missing test for early error
* Add missing test for WithBaseObject
* Improve coverage for `new.target`
* Add test for deletion of SuperReference
* Add tests for `in` keyword restrictions
* fixup! Improve coverage for `new.target`
The global isNaN is not precise at all, and Number.isNaN is an ES6 feature that makes it preferrable to use assert's sameValue for NaN values, as it handles it internally using the comparison.
This test was intended to assert the semantics of the `for-in`
statement, but it was mistakenly authored to use a `for-of` statement.
Update the statement under test, and improve the testing methodology to
correctly assert the creation of distinct bindings.
Ensure that early errors restricting labelled function declarations
within WithStatement and IfStatement are honored. Rename existing tests
to match the specification's spelling.
* Improve test coverage for `super` keyword
Add tests for SuperCall and SuperProperty, organized together in the
`test/language/expressions/super/` directory. For SuperProperty, include
tests for usage from within Object initializers and class bodies because
a different set of semantics are observable from each context.
The prior version of this test asserted only the property's
configurability. It was also limited to the RegExp object as returned
from the RegExp constructor.
Extend the test to verify all values of the property descriptor.
Duplicate these assertions in a separate file dedicated to the RegExp
object as created from a RegExp literal.
The specification contains an explicit informative NOTE explaining that
the 'm' flag does not effect the behavior of the '^' assertion. Add a
test to verify this.
ES2015 reads:
> RegExpUnicodeEscapeSequence :: u{ HexDigits }
>
> - It is a Syntax Error if the MV of HexDigits > 1114111.
Use the MV 0x110000 to assert the lower boundary of values which are
expected to produce the SyntaxError.
A subtle aspect of the for-of iteration protocol concerns abrupt
completions that do *not* trigger iterator closing. Although this detail
is implicit in the current structure of the specification text, some
hosts may violate the protocol by closing the iterator because later
steps *do* specify that behavior.
The V8 engine is one such host--as of this writing, it incorrectly
closes the iterator when accessing the `value` property of the iterator
result produces an abrupt completion.
Add tests verifying that the iterator protocol is not violated in this
way for abrupt completions during the semantics of for-of evaluation.
These tests have been re-factored to expand coverage of the "default
parameter" language feature and to more closely adhere to this project's
preferred file organization.
Ensure that when HasBinding of an Object environment record returns an
abrupt completion, that same completion is returned to the runtime.
Update the meta-data of related tests for consistency with this new
test.
The latest revision of ECMA262 makes special provisions for classes
which extend the `null` value [1]. Update the relevant tests
accordingly.
[1] https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/543
Utilize the test generation tool to increase coverage of destructuring
assignment semantics. Previously, only destructuring assignment in the
AssignmentExpression position was tested. With this change applied, the
same tests will assert expected behavior for destructuring assignment in
`for..of` statements, as well.
A limited number of tests are applied to the `for..in` statement as
well, but due to the iteration protocol observed by that statement, many
destructuring tests are not relevant, and others cannot be automatically
generated from this format.
