Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mathias Bynens b9daa57dcb Rename to $DONOTEVALUATE per @leobalter's suggestion 2018-10-23 13:51:17 +02:00
Mathias Bynens e3feffb01e Move `throw "…"` for negative parsing errors to a helper function
Closes #1634.
2018-10-23 13:51:16 +02:00
Mike Pennisi 136110378b Rename negative test "phase" for parsing
Early errors may result from parsing the source text of a test file, but
they may also result from parsing some other source text as referenced
through the ES2015 module syntax. The latter form of early error is not
necessarily detectable by ECMAScript parsers, however. Because of this,
the label "early" is not sufficiently precise for all Test262 consumers
to correctly interpret all tests.

Update the "phase" name of "early" to "parse" for all those negative
tests that describe errors resulting from parsing of the file's source
text directly. A forthcoming commit will update the remaining tests to
use a "phase" name that is more specific to module resolution.
2018-01-05 15:17:50 -05:00
Mike Pennisi 81d00def42 Force "early error" tests to fail if evaluated
This pattern makes expectations more explicit by making test files more
literal.
2017-06-28 11:24:36 -04:00
Mike Pennisi ade6d2e384 Remove "NotEarlyError" object
Because expectations regarding error "phase" are now expressed via test
meta-data, the test runner may now enforce this requirement on negative
tests.

Remove the "NotEarlyError" from the project source. This reduces the
amount of domain knowledge required to author tests and lessens the
potential for inconsistencies between tests.
2016-10-19 15:24:22 -04:00
Mike Pennisi 7d4b1d28ae Re-format tests for SyntaxErrors
Authored via the following command:

   $ find test -type f -print0 | \
       xargs -0 sed \
         -i 's/^\(\s*\)negative:\s*SyntaxError\s*$/\1negative:\n\1  phase: early\n\1  type: SyntaxError/g'
2016-10-19 15:24:21 -04:00
André Bargull a85f5039e0 Remove links to hg.ecmascript.org 2015-07-17 17:43:09 +02:00
Mike Pennisi 29ecced632 Update handling of directive prologues
Some tests specifically concern the application of the `use strict`
directive as it appears in JavaScript source code. These tests should
*not* be run with the `onlyStrict` flag because relying on the test
runner to enable strict mode makes the semantics of the source code
irrelevant. Update these tests to use the `noStrict` flag.

Other tests concern language semantics that are only valid in strict
mode, but the mechanism for enabling strictness is inconseqential.
Update these tests to use the `onlyStrict` flag and remove any redundant
`use strict` directive prologues contained within.

Still other tests are valid both within and outside of strict mode.
In keeping with the majority of other tests, do not specify any
restrictions on the environments in which these tests may be run.
2015-06-18 17:38:34 -04:00
Brian Terlson 2a74f0ec1b Reorganize ./test 2014-12-07 15:33:09 -08:00