This removes several loopholes where it was possible to return particular
values from user calls that would cause infinite loops, or calculate
zero-length days.
This allows removing several tests, as calendar.dateAdd() is no longer
called in several places, and it's no longer possible to create a
situation where BigInt arithmetic is observable in NanosecondsToDays.
Note the monkeypatch of getPossibleInstantsFor in test/built-ins/Temporal/
TimeZone/prototype/getInstantFor/argument-builtin-calendar-no-array-
iteration.js.
Other than that, all the tests are basically identical.
Adds new tests to order-of-operations.js in Duration.round and
Duration.total, to exercise the code path where previous to this normative
change, relativeTo would have been converted to PlainDate 3x and 2x,
respectively.
This shortcut path now exists in all round(), since(), and until()
operations.
In Instant, PlainDate, PlainDateTime, and PlainTime, the change isn't
observable, so no tests could be added. This adds test coverage for
- Duration.p.round()
- PlainYearMonth.p.since()
- PlainYearMonth.p.until()
- ZonedDateTime.p.round()
- ZonedDateTime.p.since()
- ZonedDateTime.p.until()
As well as a few cases where we are testing that certain calendar methods
get called during a round operation, but previously were doing so with
options that now become a no-op and no longer call those calendar methods.
In those cases, round to 2 ns, rather than 1 ns.
This commit verifies that ISO strings with sub-minute offsets cannot
be parsed into time zone identifiers. This was a change introduced in
the recently-merged tc39/proposal-temporal#2607, but tests for this case
were missing from #3862 (the tests for that PR).
I noticed in codecov results on an unrelated PR that this case wasn't
being tested, so fixing that mistake now.
Edits Temporal tests to account for changes in
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2574.
This PR stops coercing non-string primitive inputs to strings
in Temporal methods, to avoid cases where numbers
are coerced to syntactically valid but often unexpected
string results.
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for all direct callers
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2570
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalDate
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalDateTime
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalZonedDateTime
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalYearMonth
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalMonthDay
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToRelativeTemporalObject
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through AddDurationToOrSubtractDurationFromPlainYearMonth
Add order-of-operations tests for:
- Temporal.ZonedDateTime.p.getISOFields()
- Temporal.ZonedDateTime.p.round()
- years with ZonedDateTime relativeTo in Temporal.Duration.p.round()
- years with ZonedDateTime relativeTo in Temporal.Duration.p.total()
- property Gets on receiver in Temporal.PlainDateTime.p.with()
- ZonedDateTime difference methods with largestUnit being a time unit
- Duration.compare with no units higher than hours
Before the issue is fixed, rounding a duration such as 'PT2400h' with
months as largest unit fails to balance it properly and gives a result
with days being the largest unit. The test ensures that such rounding
happens properly.
Previously, "nested" calendar property bags were unwrapped up to one
level. That is, this object:
{
calendar: {
// ...Temporal.Calendar methods
}
}
would not be considered to implement the Calendar protocol, but would have
its calendar property used instead, if it were passed to an API that
required a Calendar protocol object.
These nested property bags are no longer supported. Discussion:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2104#issuecomment-1409549753
Corresponding normative PR:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2485
Previously, "nested" time zone property bags were unwrapped up to one
level. That is, this object:
{
timeZone: {
// ...Temporal.TimeZone methods
}
}
would not be considered to implement the TimeZone protocol, but would have
its timeZone property used instead, if it were passed to an API that
required a TimeZone protocol object.
These nested property bags are no longer supported. Discussion:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2104#issuecomment-1409549753
Corresponding normative PR:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2485
In several tests involving custom calendars, we need to change the
implementation of dateFromFields/monthDayFromFields/yearMonthFromFields so
that the returned object gets the receiver as its calendar after chaining
up to the builtin implementation.
Normative PR: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2482
Previously in a few cases (calendar units in Duration) the value for the
roundingIncrement option had no upper limit, other than having to be
finite. These tests cover a normative change limiting it to 1e9.
Normative PR: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2480
This contains tests for the normative PR
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2437, which is to be
presented for consensus to TC39 in the upcoming plenary meeting. That PR
changes the observable order of property accesses to be alphabetical where
possible.
This contains tests for the normative PR
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2433, which is to be
presented for consensus to TC39 in the upcoming plenary meeting. That PR
changes ToTemporalCalendar to throw when it encounters a Temporal.TimeZone
instance, and ToTemporalTimeZone to throw when it encounters a
Temporal.Calendar instance.
This adds order-of-operations tests that cover all of the Temporal entry
points that accept options bags, that were not already covered. We'll be
using these tests in the future to verify
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2254
However, the tests in this commit reflect the current state of the
proposal, not the potential normative change.
The `relativeTo` parameter in an options bag may be undefined, a PlainDate
instance, or a ZonedDateTime instance. Each of these three possibilities
causes a different set of observable operations, which we can test in our
existing order-of-operations tests.
There are additional observable operations that occur when providing an
`offset` property in a relativeTo or ZonedDateTime property bag. We can
test these in our existing order-of-operations tests.
Normally, a plain object passed into an API that takes a Temporal.TimeZone
has its 'timeZone' property checked (observably) with a Has operation
followed by a Get operation if the property is present. In the normative
change https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2392 which reached
consensus at the September 2022 TC39 meeting, this was changed so that
this check is skipped for objects which have the Temporal.TimeZone
internal slots.
This adds tests to all entry points that pass a user-supplied object to
ToTemporalTimeZone, with a "poisoned" timeZone object which has the
correct internal slots but a 'timeZone' accessor property whose getter
throws. A correct implementation should not cause this getter to throw.
In these tests, we should make a distinction in the name for clarity. It's
testing a time zone passed as a property in a property bag (either as an
argument, or as a relativeTo option), so name it accordingly as we do with
other tests in the same folder.
