Currently, this test is not conformant to the proposal text.
Temporal.TimeZone.from() calls ToTemporalTimeZone. Since the argument is
a string, we next go to ParseTemporalTimeZone, where on a string such as
`1994-11-05T08:15:30-05:00[UTC]` we would return _result_.[[Name]] (which
would be equal to `UTC`) and discard the UTC offset string.
Unfortunately, in #3304 I made a last-minute mistake when I added the
uncallable value to the assertion message, and neglected to test it;
Symbols can't be converted to strings like that, so these tests would
fail. This fixes the assertion messages.
Tests for the normative changes made to Temporal in
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/1829
In a previous version of the specification, there was a fallback to the
intrinsic getOffsetNanosecondsFor when it was undefined.
A number of tests for ECMA402 asserted the exact contents of the array
returned by various `resolvedOptions` methods. This conflicted with the
expectation that more options will be introduced by future editions of
the specification.
Update these tests to assert property order more generically in order to
accommodate implementation of future language proposals and more closely
align with similar tests.
Update all `resolvedOptions` tests to produce more meaningful error
messages (including replacing the generic `arrayContains` assertion with
a specific assertion regarding the value of the first array element).
Specify a descriptive value for the previously-unused third parameter of
the `verifyFormatParts` function in order to disambiguate error
messages.
This patch was generated with the following command:
sed -i 's/\(verifyFormatParts([^,]\+, \)\([^,]\+\))/\1\2, "\2")/g' \
test/intl402/NumberFormat/prototype/formatToParts/signDisplay-currency-*
This reverts commit b690cb67be9b487eb10156c03e2c00869e88cc9d, reversing
changes made to 50dd431dffe5cf86e9064a652d6b01dbbe542cf0. This is
necessary because the reverted changeset reduced coverage by an unknown
extent.
In each case, it's the scalar value associated with the "description" key.
Normally in test262, this is written in either:
- block notation (indicated by '>' or '|'), or
- flow notation, single-line, on the same line as the key.
In the cases addressed by this PR, the value is instead written in:
- (1x) flow notation, *multi*-line, or
- (2x) flow notation, single-line, on the line *after* the key.
These are valid YAML, but they're styles that test262 doesn't otherwise use,
so could conceivably confuse people or harnesses.
This PR changes them to block notation.
* Fix test for only {localeMatcher: "lookup"}
The expectation that "sr-Thai-RS" would be returned is only true with the
9.2.2 BestAvailableLocale ( availableLocales, locale )
https://tc39.es/ecma402/#sec-bestavailablelocale
algorithm used by 9.2.3 LookupMatcher ( availableLocales, requestedLocales )
https://tc39.es/ecma402/#sec-lookupmatcher
The default for localeMatcher is "best fit" but not "lookup" for all Intl objects.
And for 9.2.4 BestFitMatcher ( availableLocales, requestedLocales )
https://tc39.es/ecma402/#sec-bestfitmatcher
It may not match "sr-Thai-RS" for "sr" and return ["de", "zh-CN"] instead. Therefore, we need to change this test to only test on {localeMatcher: "lookup"}
* Add option to getLocaleSupportInfo
Needed to test different localeMatcher
* only test for "lookup" localeMatcher
* Get the info based on the localeMatcher
* pass in localeMatcher to getLocaleSupportInfo
* Add basic tests for weekInfo
* Add basic tests for textInfo
* Add basic tests for timeZones
* Add basic tests for numberingSystems
* Add basic tests for hourCycles
* Add basic tests for collations
* Add basic tests for calendars
* Add feature for Intl.Locale-info
* add validation to branding tests for locale-info
Add additional assertion to branding tests for proposal-intl-locale-info
to make sure they don't pass spuriously when the proposal is not
implemented.
* Change Intl.(ListFormat|DisplayNames|Segmenter)
Sync from ToObject to GetOptionsObject which throw TypeError
while the option is not object
* Add null and false to test
Add tests to make sure DateTimeFormat does not call the instanceof
operator and calls OrdinaryHasInstance instead.
Refs: https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/pull/500
intl402/DateTimeFormat/prototype/formatRangeToParts/date-same-returns-single-date.js is using `formatRange` and `format`.
Fix this test to use `formatRangeToParts` and `formatToParts` since it is the intention of this test.
This patch adds additional tests to intl402/DateTimeFormat/prototype/formatRangeToParts/date-same-returns-single-date.js and
intl402/DateTimeFormat/prototype/formatRange/date-same-returns-single-date.js. The new test uses two dates that are practially-equal,
and ensures the implementation uses `format` or `formatToParts` by detecting they are practically-equal.
