These are no longer possible without custom objects. Also add an exception
for calendar and timeZone properties in property bag observers so they are
not treated as objects.
Add order-of-operations tests for:
- Temporal.ZonedDateTime.p.getISOFields()
- Temporal.ZonedDateTime.p.round()
- years with ZonedDateTime relativeTo in Temporal.Duration.p.round()
- years with ZonedDateTime relativeTo in Temporal.Duration.p.total()
- property Gets on receiver in Temporal.PlainDateTime.p.with()
- ZonedDateTime difference methods with largestUnit being a time unit
- Duration.compare with no units higher than hours
Previously, "nested" calendar property bags were unwrapped up to one
level. That is, this object:
{
calendar: {
// ...Temporal.Calendar methods
}
}
would not be considered to implement the Calendar protocol, but would have
its calendar property used instead, if it were passed to an API that
required a Calendar protocol object.
These nested property bags are no longer supported. Discussion:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2104#issuecomment-1409549753
Corresponding normative PR:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2485
Previously, "nested" time zone property bags were unwrapped up to one
level. That is, this object:
{
timeZone: {
// ...Temporal.TimeZone methods
}
}
would not be considered to implement the TimeZone protocol, but would have
its timeZone property used instead, if it were passed to an API that
required a TimeZone protocol object.
These nested property bags are no longer supported. Discussion:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2104#issuecomment-1409549753
Corresponding normative PR:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2485
This contains tests for the normative PR
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2437, which is to be
presented for consensus to TC39 in the upcoming plenary meeting. That PR
changes the observable order of property accesses to be alphabetical where
possible.
The `relativeTo` parameter in an options bag may be undefined, a PlainDate
instance, or a ZonedDateTime instance. Each of these three possibilities
causes a different set of observable operations, which we can test in our
existing order-of-operations tests.
There are additional observable operations that occur when providing an
`offset` property in a relativeTo or ZonedDateTime property bag. We can
test these in our existing order-of-operations tests.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2267 which eliminated
some unnecessary lookups of the calendar's dateAdd method from the
MoveRelativeDate AO, which is called in the calendar types' since() and
until() methods, Duration.p.round(), and Duration.p.total().
This adds tests for the order of all observable operations for these 10
methods, not just the lookups of dateAdd on the calendar. (These methods
needed to have their order of observable operations tested anyway.)
They heavily use the TemporalHelpers.calendarObserver and
TemporalHelpers.timeZoneObserver added in the previous commits.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2267 included changes to
several code paths, not all of which are reachable through every method
tested here; only Duration.p.round() can trigger the full set.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2267 reached consensus at
the July 2022 TC39 plenary meeting.
