Now that we don't have to deal with strings or objects as input to the
calendar ID or time zone ID parameter of constructors, we accept only the
data that actually goes into the internal slots.
Previously getISOFields() was used to get the exact value of the
[[Calendar]] and [[TimeZone]] internal slots, as well as to get the
reference ISO year for PlainMonthDay and reference ISO day for
PlainYearMonth.
Use calendarId and timeZoneId for the former and toString() for the
latter.
Without custom calendars and time zones there are actually a bunch of
things that we now can't test on implementations that don't have non-ISO
calendars or non-UTC time zones. (Alternatively, we can say that these are
functionalities that those implementations don't have to implement.)
These are no longer possible without custom objects. Also add an exception
for calendar and timeZone properties in property bag observers so they are
not treated as objects.
Many tests tested some functionality while asserting that there were no
calls of calendar or time zone methods. We can continue testing the
functionality, but there are no more methods to call, so we can delete
those parts of the tests.
It's no longer possible to fake built-in time zones using custom objects.
So testing DST shifts will have to use real built-in time zones. Replace
TemporalHelpers.springForwardFallBackTimeZone with America/Vancouver (it
was modelled on the DST transitions in 2000) and
TemporalHelpers.crossDateLineTimeZone with Pacific/Apia (it was modelled
on the 2011 switch to the other side of the international date line.)
These tests have to move to the intl402/ folder since non-Intl-aware
implementations are allowed (but not required) to support any built-in
time zones other than UTC.
In many cases we created a TimeZone or Calendar instance from a built-in
time zone or calendar. These tests can be trivially adapted to just use
the string ID.
Some of the tests can be removed altogether since they deal with what
forms of input can be passed to ToTemporalTimeZoneSlotValue. Those are
tested on every method that takes a TimeZone as input.
Other tests are still relevant, but need to move to ZonedDateTime.p.equals
where the various quirks of time zone equality can still be tested. (Some
of these still will be removed in a following commit because they use
time zone objects.)
See: #2826
Temporarily replace them with getISOFields().calendar/timeZone just to
keep the tests running until we remove Calendar and TimeZone objects
altogether.
See: tc39/proposal-temporal#2826
Following the upstream ECMA-402 change tested in the previous commit, add
test coverage for the corresponding functionality in Temporal. Fix one
test that was erroneous.
See tc39/proposal-temporal#2825.
Various edits to existing tests so that they make more sense with the
removal of relativeTo.
New tests specifically testing that calendar units cannot be added or
subtracted directly.
See tc39/proposal-temporal#2825. This is a mass removal of tests that use
this functionality, in a separate commit for ease of review. Further
adjustments will be made in the following commit.
This covers an edge case that we hit, where 24 hours would not balance up
to one day in a 25-hour day if only largestUnit was specified, but would
erroneously balance up if rounding was also performed by specifying
smallestUnit.
In ZonedDateTime.p.since/until, it's possible for AddDateTime to hit the
limit if the rounding increment is very high, even if the resulting
rounded duration isn't outside of the limit. Add a test covering this
case.
This should produce all the same results (except for a change to weeks
balancing in round(), which is now more consistent with since()/until())
but leads to different observable user code calls.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2742
It was previously not tested what options value a custom calendar's
dateFromFields() method would be called with, when called from the
toPlainDate() method of PlainYearMonth/PlainMonthDay.
See tc39/proposal-temporal#2803
These tests were supposed to test an invalid ISO string being used as the
`calendar` property in a property bag. Instead they were testing being
used as an invalid ISO string directly where a PlainDate input was needed.
(That is also already covered elsewhere.)
Due to overlooked copy-paste errors we were creating the wrong type of
instance in these tests, and therefore testing the wrong method.
(Add blank line for consistency with the other instances of these tests.)
After rounding relative to a ZonedDateTime, we have to potentially adjust
for DST. With a time zone providing nonsensical values, the duration may
go out of range.
See: tc39/proposal-temporal#2801
This test isn't testing what the assertion message previously said it was
testing. The integer is allowed to be unsafe, but in this case its
float64-representation is out of range.
See: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2785
With test cases kindly provided by Anba, this adds test coverage for the
abrupt completion in the last step of DifferenceTemporalPlainDateTime,
where the resulting Duration components have mixed signs.
See: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2783
normalized-time-duration-to-days-range-errors.js tests for several error
cases in the AO NormalizedTimeDurationToDays. Adding assertion messages
helps to know which one you are debugging.
As per IETF, annotation keys may only consist of lowercase letters,
dashes, and digits, and an optional leading underscore. Uppercase letters
are non-syntactical. Add tests covering this.
Philip Chimento
André Bargull
Adam Shaw
Timothy Leverett