See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2563
The old behaviour was encoded in one test in staging, but the behaviour of
largestUnit in duration rounding has changed since that test was written.
Therefore I'm assuming that toString() should've been updated when that
happened.
In the AO DisambiguatePossibleInstants, a PlainDateTime instance is passed
to user code. This instance should have the built-in ISO 8601 calendar.
Here are some tests that ensure it does.
See tc39/proposal-temporal#2671.
This removes several loopholes where it was possible to return particular
values from user calls that would cause infinite loops, or calculate
zero-length days.
This allows removing several tests, as calendar.dateAdd() is no longer
called in several places, and it's no longer possible to create a
situation where BigInt arithmetic is observable in NanosecondsToDays.
Note the monkeypatch of getPossibleInstantsFor in test/built-ins/Temporal/
TimeZone/prototype/getInstantFor/argument-builtin-calendar-no-array-
iteration.js.
Other than that, all the tests are basically identical.
Adds new tests to order-of-operations.js in Duration.round and
Duration.total, to exercise the code path where previous to this normative
change, relativeTo would have been converted to PlainDate 3x and 2x,
respectively.
This shortcut path now exists in all round(), since(), and until()
operations.
In Instant, PlainDate, PlainDateTime, and PlainTime, the change isn't
observable, so no tests could be added. This adds test coverage for
- Duration.p.round()
- PlainYearMonth.p.since()
- PlainYearMonth.p.until()
- ZonedDateTime.p.round()
- ZonedDateTime.p.since()
- ZonedDateTime.p.until()
As well as a few cases where we are testing that certain calendar methods
get called during a round operation, but previously were doing so with
options that now become a no-op and no longer call those calendar methods.
In those cases, round to 2 ns, rather than 1 ns.
This commit verifies that ISO strings with sub-minute offsets cannot
be parsed into time zone identifiers. This was a change introduced in
the recently-merged tc39/proposal-temporal#2607, but tests for this case
were missing from #3862 (the tests for that PR).
I noticed in codecov results on an unrelated PR that this case wasn't
being tested, so fixing that mistake now.
Codecov showed that PlainTime strings like "09:00:00Z[UTC]" or
"09:00:00Z" were not being tested. This commit fills that gap.
It'd probably be good to make similar changes for other Plain* types,
but Codecov didn't complain about them so they may be covered
via other tests so it was less urgent.
This commit fills a test hole found by Codecov: we weren't checking for
the case of a custom time zone whose `id` property returns a non-string
value.
Note that the `id` property is only read in a few places, all on the
ZonedDateTime prototype: `until`, `since`, `equals`, `toString`,
`toLocaleString`, `toJSON`, and `timeZoneId`.
Edits Temporal tests to account for changes in
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2574.
This PR stops coercing non-string primitive inputs to strings
in Temporal methods, to avoid cases where numbers
are coerced to syntactically valid but often unexpected
string results.
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for all direct callers
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2570
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalDate
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalDateTime
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalZonedDateTime
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalYearMonth
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToTemporalMonthDay
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through ToRelativeTemporalObject
* Add tests for the new PrepareTemporalFields behavior for indirect callers through AddDurationToOrSubtractDurationFromPlainYearMonth
As per IETF review, an IXDTF string (ISO 8601 with annotations) is no
longer valid if it contains more than one u-ca annotation and at least one
of the annotations is marked critical.
Removes tests where such a string was assumed to be valid, and adds new
ones with a few variations on invalid strings.
Add order-of-operations tests for:
- Temporal.ZonedDateTime.p.getISOFields()
- Temporal.ZonedDateTime.p.round()
- years with ZonedDateTime relativeTo in Temporal.Duration.p.round()
- years with ZonedDateTime relativeTo in Temporal.Duration.p.total()
- property Gets on receiver in Temporal.PlainDateTime.p.with()
- ZonedDateTime difference methods with largestUnit being a time unit
- Duration.compare with no units higher than hours
Previously, "nested" calendar property bags were unwrapped up to one
level. That is, this object:
{
calendar: {
// ...Temporal.Calendar methods
}
}
would not be considered to implement the Calendar protocol, but would have
its calendar property used instead, if it were passed to an API that
required a Calendar protocol object.
These nested property bags are no longer supported. Discussion:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2104#issuecomment-1409549753
Corresponding normative PR:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2485
Previously, "nested" time zone property bags were unwrapped up to one
level. That is, this object:
{
timeZone: {
// ...Temporal.TimeZone methods
}
}
would not be considered to implement the TimeZone protocol, but would have
its timeZone property used instead, if it were passed to an API that
required a TimeZone protocol object.
These nested property bags are no longer supported. Discussion:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2104#issuecomment-1409549753
Corresponding normative PR:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2485
Compare semantics for custom time zones that _don't_ extend
Temporal.TimeZone (and therefore don't have the internal slot) use the
value of the .id property, instead of calling toString().
Normative PR: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2482
This is the replacement of the old API with the new API, .timeZoneId and
.getTimeZone(). Semantics will be corrected in the following commit.
Normative PR: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2482
Compare semantics for custom calendars that _don't_ extend
Temporal.Calendar (and therefore don't have the internal slot) use the
value of the .id property, instead of calling toString().
Normative PR: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2482
In several tests involving custom calendars, we need to change the
implementation of dateFromFields/monthDayFromFields/yearMonthFromFields so
that the returned object gets the receiver as its calendar after chaining
up to the builtin implementation.
Normative PR: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2482
Has several effects on existing tests:
- Remove PlainTime from various tests that extract a Temporal.Calendar
instance from another Temporal object.
- Remove Temporal.PlainTime.prototype.calendar property.
- Remove calendar property from object returned from
Temporal.PlainTime.prototype.getISOFields().
- Ignore calendar annotation when converting ISO string to PlainTime.
Normative PR: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2482
In since() and until() methods, we copy the options object with
CopyDataProperties. Previously, its properties could be read in more than
one place (the method itself, and the calendar method), triggering user
code each time. Now, we pass around null-prototype objects with only data
properties.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2447
Previously in a few cases (calendar units in Duration) the value for the
roundingIncrement option had no upper limit, other than having to be
finite. These tests cover a normative change limiting it to 1e9.
Normative PR: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2480
The with() methods, as well as PlainYearMonth's since() and until(), were
adjusted to read the receiver's fields before the fields of any objects
provided as arguments. This change is observable, so affects several tests
that test the observed order of operations.
Normative PR: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2478
I used a script to "unroll" some of the calls to
TemporalHelpers.checkToTemporalCalendarFastPath(), and rewrite it slightly
not to use a specific Calendar instance. This is in preparation for a
future refactor, but also allows testing the PlainTime path which was not
previously covered.
(I didn't unroll all the calls and remove the helper yet, because the
remaining calls have custom assertions that I haven't gotten the script to
work with yet. For the same reason, I didn't yet convert these to use the
test generation facility. These will follow in a future PR.)
For each entry point where a string calendar name is accepted, we should
have a test that ensures the calendar name is case-insensitive. These
tests existed but several were incomplete as they didn't take nested
properties into account, and several entry points were missing this test.
Fix a minor copy-paste issue with double semicolons.
This contains tests for the normative PR
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2437, which is to be
presented for consensus to TC39 in the upcoming plenary meeting. That PR
changes the observable order of property accesses to be alphabetical where
possible.
As per the discussion in
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2379#issuecomment-1248557100
and the PR https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2398, which is
to be presented for consensus to TC39 in the upcoming plenary meeting, UTC
offsets and the Z designator should be disallowed after any date-only
strings (YYYY-MM-DD, YYYY-MM, and MM-DD). They should only be allowed to
follow a time component. Z remains disallowed in any string being parsed
into a Plain type.
Annotations become allowed after any ISO string, even YYYY-MM and MM-DD
where they were previously disallowed.
To be presented for consensus in the November/December TC39 meeting. This
adds tests for a 'yearOfWeek' getter to PlainDate, PlainDateTime, and
ZonedDateTime, for use alongside 'weekOfYear', and tests for a
corresponding method to Calendar.
The tests are basically the existing tests of 'weekOfYear' adapted.
Temporal issue: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2405
This contains tests for the normative PR
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2433, which is to be
presented for consensus to TC39 in the upcoming plenary meeting. That PR
changes ToTemporalCalendar to throw when it encounters a Temporal.TimeZone
instance, and ToTemporalTimeZone to throw when it encounters a
Temporal.Calendar instance.
This adds order-of-operations tests that cover all of the Temporal entry
points that accept options bags, that were not already covered. We'll be
using these tests in the future to verify
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2254
However, the tests in this commit reflect the current state of the
proposal, not the potential normative change.
There are additional observable operations that occur when providing an
`offset` property in a relativeTo or ZonedDateTime property bag. We can
test these in our existing order-of-operations tests.
This tests some of the normative changes in
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2245, which achieved
consensus in the July 2022 TC39 meeting, specifically as they apply to
places where the MergeLargestUnitOperation was called.
Due to the use of the pre-existing spec operation CopyDataProperties, the
order of observable property operations has changed from a batch of
[[GetOwnProperty]] followed by a batch of [[Get]], to a series of
interleaved [[GetOwnProperty]]/[[Get]] pairs. This previously wasn't
tested because TemporalHelpers.propertyBagObserver didn't track
[[GetOwnProperty]] operations, but now it does.
Normally, a plain object passed into an API that takes a Temporal.TimeZone
has its 'timeZone' property checked (observably) with a Has operation
followed by a Get operation if the property is present. In the normative
change https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2392 which reached
consensus at the September 2022 TC39 meeting, this was changed so that
this check is skipped for objects which have the Temporal.TimeZone
internal slots.
This adds tests to all entry points that pass a user-supplied object to
ToTemporalTimeZone, with a "poisoned" timeZone object which has the
correct internal slots but a 'timeZone' accessor property whose getter
throws. A correct implementation should not cause this getter to throw.
Normally, a plain object passed into an API that takes a Temporal.Calendar
has its 'calendar' property checked (observably) with a Has operation
followed by a Get operation if the property is present. In the normative
change https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2392 which reached
consensus at the September 2022 TC39 meeting, this was changed so that
this check is skipped for objects which have the Temporal.Calendar
internal slots.
This adds tests to all entry points that pass a user-supplied object to
ToTemporalCalendar, with a "poisoned" calendar object which has the
correct internal slots but a 'calendar' accessor property whose getter
throws. A correct implementation should not cause this getter to throw.
In these tests, we should make a distinction in the name for clarity. It's
testing a time zone passed as a property in a property bag (either as an
argument, or as a relativeTo option), so name it accordingly as we do with
other tests in the same folder.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2316 which eliminated
an observable call to Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator]() in the case where
a calendar's 'fields' property was undefined.
The best way I've thought of to test this is to monkeypatch the
Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator]() method to make it throw. In some cases,
where we are actually expected to iterate the return value from a
Temporal.TimeZone's getPossibleInstantsFor() method, we have to provide a
custom method for that as well, that returns a non-Array iterable so we
don't call the patched Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator]().
This normative change reached consensus at the July 2022 TC39 plenary
meeting.
The programmer always gets the last word over how the string is
interpreted, since otherwise it's not possible to make any guarantees
about the offset option. (This is the "out-of-band" mechanism mentioned in
the IETF draft.) Add a test for this.
Based on the improvements just made to the calendarName option, improve
the tests for the timeZoneName option of ZonedDateTime.prototype.toString
as well.
Since we are going to be adding a new test for calendarName: "critical",
take the existing tests for various values of the calendarName option, and
regularize them. Previously, depending on which type's toString() method
was under test, the tests had various degrees of thoroughness, and some
were only present in staging.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2397
Adds tests for ISO strings with more than one time zone annotation. These
are not syntactically correct according to the grammar and should be
rejected.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2397
Adds tests for ISO strings with unrecognized annotations, (i.e., neither
time zone nor calendar), in various combinations with recognized
annotations.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2397
Adds tests for ISO strings with calendar annotations, with and without the
critical flag, and also a check that the second calendar annotation is
disregarded, as per the IETF draft.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2397
Adds tests for ISO strings with named and numeric offset time zone
annotations, with and without the critical flag, with various combinations
of Z and offset in front of the annotation.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2267 which eliminated
some unnecessary lookups of the calendar's dateAdd method from the
MoveRelativeDate AO, which is called in the calendar types' since() and
until() methods, Duration.p.round(), and Duration.p.total().
This adds tests for the order of all observable operations for these 10
methods, not just the lookups of dateAdd on the calendar. (These methods
needed to have their order of observable operations tested anyway.)
They heavily use the TemporalHelpers.calendarObserver and
TemporalHelpers.timeZoneObserver added in the previous commits.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2267 included changes to
several code paths, not all of which are reachable through every method
tested here; only Duration.p.round() can trigger the full set.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2267 reached consensus at
the July 2022 TC39 plenary meeting.
Similar to the previous commit with property bags, many existing tests use
a Proxy to test the order of observable operations which involve user code
passed in as part of a Temporal.TimeZone object. I am going to write
several more tests that do this, as well. This seems like a good thing to
put into TemporalHelpers, where it can be implemented consistently so that
we don't get discrepancies in which operations are tracked.
Updates existing tests to use this helper.
This adds tests for the normative change in tc39/proposal-temporal#2265,
which adds validation steps to certain abstract operations that call
Temporal.Calendar methods.
These had some duplication with some existing tests named
calendar-returns-infinity.js. Remove these, because the new tests are more
complete in testing what values are accepted.
The existing tests would fail after making the normative change from
tc39/proposal-temporal#2265 because they rely on the getter directly
returning whatever value the calendar method returned. This is no longer
the case, because the value returned by the calendar is validated, so
adjust the assertions in these tests.
Also, no longer any need to return a value from the calendar method that
needs to be converted; we'll add separate tests for that.
Expand these tests to cover all of the PlainDate, PlainDateTime,
PlainMonthDay, PlainYearMonth, and ZonedDateTime property getters that
delegate to the calendar methods.
Temporal tests written for the SpiderMonkey implementation. Mostly
covers edge cases around mathematical operations and regression tests
for reported spec bugs.
The "half___" modes all round to the nearest increment except when there
is a tie. The previous tests didn't test rounding in the case of any ties
(except for .toString()) so here we use some different numbers in which
there is a tie, in order to make tests where the "half___" modes are more
thoroughly tested.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2262 which added new
rounding modes from NumberFormat V3.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2262 which added new
rounding modes from NumberFormat V3.
These tests use the same format as the previous ones. The tests for the
"half" rounding modes aren't very good yet, as they don't show any of the
differences between the tiebreaking schemes; there aren't any ties in the
data to be broken. (Except in .toString().) A subsequent commit will
correct this.
Take all the existing tests for round() calculations using different
rounding modes and standardize them. Add tests for Duration, Instant and
ZonedDateTime, which were still in the old format in staging.
Take all the existing tests for since/until calculations using different
rounding modes and standardize them. Add tests for Instant and
ZonedDateTime, which were still in the old format in staging.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2262, which reached
consensus in the July 2022 TC39 meeting. This change added several
rounding modes from the NumberFormat V3 proposal, some of which were
listed as invalid in the roundingmode-invalid-string tests. Remove these
items from the list of invalid modes, since they are no longer invalid.
This tests the normative change from
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2260
which achieved consensus in the July 2022 TC39 meeting.
The return value from a userland getOffsetNanosecondsFor method is no
longer allowed to be exactly one 24-hour day.
This adds tests that validate a user-callable getOffsetNanosecondsFor to
several APIs that didn't test this yet: ZonedDateTime.since/until, and
Calendar.era/eraYear.
In order for some tests to ensure that they are testing the right
exception, we need to make sure we are in the path where there are no
possible instants for a particular date-time. Override this method in some
tests.
This adds an object, TemporalHelpers.ISO, which has methods that return
arrays of various ISO strings. The idea is to deduplicate more string
tests into methods on this object.
Philip Chimento
Justin Grant
Guillaume Emont
André Bargull
Aditi
Richard Gibson
Cam Tenny
Frank Yung-Fong Tang
Philip Chimento