Some tests specifically concern the application of the `use strict`
directive as it appears in JavaScript source code. These tests should
*not* be run with the `onlyStrict` flag because relying on the test
runner to enable strict mode makes the semantics of the source code
irrelevant. Update these tests to use the `noStrict` flag.
Other tests concern language semantics that are only valid in strict
mode, but the mechanism for enabling strictness is inconseqential.
Update these tests to use the `onlyStrict` flag and remove any redundant
`use strict` directive prologues contained within.
Still other tests are valid both within and outside of strict mode.
In keeping with the majority of other tests, do not specify any
restrictions on the environments in which these tests may be run.
The `$PRINT` helper function has no effect on test behavior. The
following tests use it to report assertion outcomes (and as a result
will fail silently):
- test/language/function-code/S10.2.1_A4_T2.js
- test/language/function-code/S10.2.1_A5.1_T1.js
- test/language/function-code/S10.2.1_A5.1_T2.js
- test/language/function-code/S10.2.1_A5.2_T1.js
Remove the function definition and all references within tests. Update
tests that use it as an error reporting mechanism to instead use an
appropriate `assert` helper function.
- Add missing "var" declarations and noStrict flags
- Add strict mode tests for:
- arguments-object/10.6-6-3 -> arguments-object/10.6-6-3-s
- arguments-object/10.6-6-4 -> arguments-object/10.6-6-4-s
- Remove try-finally clean-up code
- Add strict mode compatible tests for eval-code/S10.4.2_A1.1_T*
- No strict mode compatible files added for eval-code/S10.4.2_A1.2_T*, because it doesn't really make sense in this context.
- (S10.4.2_A1.1 and S10.4.2_A1.2 should probably be removed, because the tested behaviour is not required by the spec.)
- Split S8.5_A10, S8.5_A4 and S8.1_A3 into declaration (both modes) and assignment tests (non-strict only)
Part of issue #35.
Kevin Gibbons
André Bargull
Mike Pennisi
Brian Terlson