While we're at it, use assert() instead of assert.sameValue() for brevity,
if we are not specifically testing that the return value of hasOwnProperty
is the value true or false; and add more informative assertion messages to
help with debugging.
In some cases, the Object.hasOwnProperty.call could be replaced with
verifyProperty(), if the property descriptor was also being verified at
the same time.
This fixes some tests that were faulty to begin with: a common mistake was
Object.hasOwnProperty(obj, prop) which is probably going to return false
when that's not what you want.
The only instances left of `Object.hasOwnProperty` are one regression test
in implementation-contributed which I can't tell if it was intentionally
needed to trigger the regression, and a few instances of
`Object.hasOwnProperty('prototype')` which would defeat the purpose to
convert into `Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(Object, 'prototype')`
form.
Closes: #3524
This reverts commit b690cb67be, reversing
changes made to 50dd431dff. This is
necessary because the reverted changeset reduced coverage by an unknown
extent.
* Improve test coverage for `super` keyword
Add tests for SuperCall and SuperProperty, organized together in the
`test/language/expressions/super/` directory. For SuperProperty, include
tests for usage from within Object initializers and class bodies because
a different set of semantics are observable from each context.
Philip Chimento
rwaldron
Mike Pennisi
Leo Balter
Daniel Ehrenberg
Caio Lima