I used a script to "unroll" some of the calls to
TemporalHelpers.checkToTemporalCalendarFastPath(), and rewrite it slightly
not to use a specific Calendar instance. This is in preparation for a
future refactor, but also allows testing the PlainTime path which was not
previously covered.
(I didn't unroll all the calls and remove the helper yet, because the
remaining calls have custom assertions that I haven't gotten the script to
work with yet. For the same reason, I didn't yet convert these to use the
test generation facility. These will follow in a future PR.)
For each entry point where a string calendar name is accepted, we should
have a test that ensures the calendar name is case-insensitive. These
tests existed but several were incomplete as they didn't take nested
properties into account, and several entry points were missing this test.
Fix a minor copy-paste issue with double semicolons.
As per the discussion in
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2379#issuecomment-1248557100
and the PR https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2398, which is
to be presented for consensus to TC39 in the upcoming plenary meeting, UTC
offsets and the Z designator should be disallowed after any date-only
strings (YYYY-MM-DD, YYYY-MM, and MM-DD). They should only be allowed to
follow a time component. Z remains disallowed in any string being parsed
into a Plain type.
Annotations become allowed after any ISO string, even YYYY-MM and MM-DD
where they were previously disallowed.
This contains tests for the normative PR
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2433, which is to be
presented for consensus to TC39 in the upcoming plenary meeting. That PR
changes ToTemporalCalendar to throw when it encounters a Temporal.TimeZone
instance, and ToTemporalTimeZone to throw when it encounters a
Temporal.Calendar instance.
This adds order-of-operations tests that cover all of the Temporal entry
points that accept options bags, that were not already covered. We'll be
using these tests in the future to verify
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2254
However, the tests in this commit reflect the current state of the
proposal, not the potential normative change.
Normally, a plain object passed into an API that takes a Temporal.TimeZone
has its 'timeZone' property checked (observably) with a Has operation
followed by a Get operation if the property is present. In the normative
change https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2392 which reached
consensus at the September 2022 TC39 meeting, this was changed so that
this check is skipped for objects which have the Temporal.TimeZone
internal slots.
This adds tests to all entry points that pass a user-supplied object to
ToTemporalTimeZone, with a "poisoned" timeZone object which has the
correct internal slots but a 'timeZone' accessor property whose getter
throws. A correct implementation should not cause this getter to throw.
Normally, a plain object passed into an API that takes a Temporal.Calendar
has its 'calendar' property checked (observably) with a Has operation
followed by a Get operation if the property is present. In the normative
change https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2392 which reached
consensus at the September 2022 TC39 meeting, this was changed so that
this check is skipped for objects which have the Temporal.Calendar
internal slots.
This adds tests to all entry points that pass a user-supplied object to
ToTemporalCalendar, with a "poisoned" calendar object which has the
correct internal slots but a 'calendar' accessor property whose getter
throws. A correct implementation should not cause this getter to throw.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2316 which eliminated
an observable call to Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator]() in the case where
a calendar's 'fields' property was undefined.
The best way I've thought of to test this is to monkeypatch the
Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator]() method to make it throw. In some cases,
where we are actually expected to iterate the return value from a
Temporal.TimeZone's getPossibleInstantsFor() method, we have to provide a
custom method for that as well, that returns a non-Array iterable so we
don't call the patched Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator]().
This normative change reached consensus at the July 2022 TC39 plenary
meeting.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2397
Adds tests for ISO strings with more than one time zone annotation. These
are not syntactically correct according to the grammar and should be
rejected.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2397
Adds tests for ISO strings with unrecognized annotations, (i.e., neither
time zone nor calendar), in various combinations with recognized
annotations.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2397
Adds tests for ISO strings with calendar annotations, with and without the
critical flag, and also a check that the second calendar annotation is
disregarded, as per the IETF draft.
See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2397
Adds tests for ISO strings with named and numeric offset time zone
annotations, with and without the critical flag, with various combinations
of Z and offset in front of the annotation.
This tests the normative change from
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2260
which achieved consensus in the July 2022 TC39 meeting.
The return value from a userland getOffsetNanosecondsFor method is no
longer allowed to be exactly one 24-hour day.
Temporal tests written for the SpiderMonkey implementation. Mostly
covers edge cases around mathematical operations and regression tests
for reported spec bugs.
As of https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2219 the object
returned from the PrepareTemporalFields abstract operation should be a
null-prototype object. There are a number of places where this is
observable in one of the calendar's ...FromFields() methods. This adds
tests for this behaviour everywhere it is observable.
This adds tests for a normative change which reached consensus in the June
2022 TC39 meeting, ensuring that the representable range of
Temporal.Instant is always the same regardless of which time zone offset
is used when converting from a string.
See: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2189
This adds tests to all entry points where an ISO string is converted to a
Temporal.Instant. The tests exercise various invalid ISO strings to make
sure that they throw a RangeError.
ISO strings may separate the time from the date with a case-insensitive T,
or a space. This adds tests to all entry points that take ISO strings, to
ensure that they accept an uppercase T, lowercase T, or space as the time
separator.
These tests are based on the one test for Temporal.PlainDateTime.from that
was already present.
Some of these strings wouldn't have been valid even with a valid year in
them (e.g. strings ending in +01:00[UTC]) so fix up the strings that we
test. While touching these tests, I took the opportunity to regularize
them, and add some missing ones for ISO strings that convert to Calendar
and TimeZone.
Everywhere an ISO string is accepted in Temporal, a seconds value of :60
should always be coerced to :59, because of how leap seconds are handled
in ISO strings.
In property bags, a 'seconds: 60' property is not subject to that rule: it
should be handled according to the overflow option if there is one.
These tests existed already for some types; regularize them and add the
ones that didn't exist yet.
These tests cover, for every API entry point where a Temporal object is
expected, what happens when a value of a different type is passed in that
can't be converted.
Most entry points can convert a string to the expected Temporal type, and
will do ToString on any non-Object argument, and throw RangeError if the
result isn't a string that's convertible to that Temporal type. ToString
will throw TypeError on a Symbol.
Most entry points also take a property bag, and will throw TypeError if
the property bag doesn't have the required properties.
We also have to test for TimeZone and Calendar what happens if the wrong
type is provided as the value of a 'timeZone' or 'calendar' property in
another property bag, up to one level of nested properties.
Adds tests for conversion of a Number whose corresponding toString() value
is a valid ISO string. For some Temporal types this is possible, with a
number like 20220418.
Especially for Temporal.Calendar, we have to take into account the case
where the number is provided as the value for the 'calendar' property in a
property bag, and the case of up to one level of nested property bag as
well.
Regularizes and expands existing tests for this case.
An object may be given in any context where a Temporal.Instant is expected
(see ToTemporalInstant). There is no conversion from a property bag to an
Instant, unlike with other Temporal types. Instead the object is converted
to a string, and if its toString() method yields a valid ISO string, the
conversion succeeds. (An object with the default Object.prototype.toString
will not.)
This consolidates the few existing tests for options bags in Temporal
being of the wrong type, and adds them for every entry point in Temporal
that accepts an options bag.
These are mostly identical tests, but there is a variation for methods
like round() where either an options bag or string is accepted.
A follow up to the previous commit, this rewrites some tests that relied
on the lack of brand checks for certain Temporal.TimeZone methods.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/1693 added brand checks to
these methods.
We can no longer use a plain object time zone or even a Proxy with a real
branded Temporal.TimeZone object as its handler to do these tests, so we
instead create an instance of Temporal.TimeZone and define own accessor
properties on it in order to test the observable property accesses that we
need to see according to the spec text.
This requires an improvement to TemporalHelpers.observeProperty() in order
to be able to log property accesses to Symbol-valued properties.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/1693 added checks for the
receiver of certain Temporal.Calendar and Temporal.TimeZone methods. Add
branding tests for these methods, similar to the already existing branding
tests.
This was a normative change that achieved consensus at the December 2021
TC39 meeting.
Aditi
Philip Chimento
Philip Chimento
André Bargull
Ms2ger
Ross Kirsling
Iban Eguia Moraza
Jesse Alama